like i said, you are not winner of the match if you lose every match point of your own.
i don't know what will happen to joker when he is 38, still 5-6 years to go.
but i know federer losed every grand slam match with joker since 2012.
if joker was in form during 2016-2018, federer couldn't get...
even a championship point away from champion is still not champion.
using elo system, nadal already has more slams than federer
now we are using federer fan's favorite way to decide who is goat by counting slams, and federer fans are not happy any more.
the "low level" has context: if you want to have accurate placement in your game, or if your game requires accurate placement.
IMO, less than 4.0. If you like to progress toward 4.5 or above, you probably naturally seek accurate placement. of course you can say if your rally speedy average more...
lag to offset contact angle, makes sense geologically. however that happens in milliseconds, how train on this?
lag appears when core starts accelaration, then the lag is less and less when moving toward contact. both core rotation and lag disappearance makes racquet angle toward left (for...
next gen may not have dominator, but the topic isn't about who dominates. domination is a different topic, more about level elevation from atp avg for time being. slam number is more about accumulation. nadal and federer started accumulation stragety at least 5 years back. now joker is adopting...
people typically link thiem to nadal and link medvedev to djokovic. sorry fed fans, djokovic replaced fed, so you can say link medvedev to fed as well.
give nadal and djokovic similar age, we can assume they retire at similar time.
however, thiem is not nadal. he is competitive on clay but also...
not sure about pro speed. but in club level, 100% are less than 90 mph. that's trainable. you can use ball machine for progression
first shoot to your forehand
then a step to your forehand
then to the corner
you should be able to return 95% of serves that's less than 90mph.