Seriously if you think that your an idiot.
RG 11 = beat 3 of the top 5 seeds
USO 10 = 2 top 10 wins including Djokovic
USO 13 = 2 top 10 wins including world no 1 Djokovic
Considering that guys have won slams with 0 top 10 wins, not sure how Nadal even comes close to making this list
the reason why that match goes underrated was that it was simply the 2nd of Novak's 3 straight slam final wins over Rafa, and was easily outdone in their next match.
Of course, this match had some endless rallies, and really showed how mentally strong Djoker was,
Well Vasek is better than Raonic or Dancevic at doubles so he was always going to play the last 2 days.
I do admit maybe Frank could have played Novak in round 1, but the issue there was that you lose just about the only edge Canada had on Novak: the fact that he played just a few days prior
You want to talk about joke draws, Sampras won Wimbledon in 2000 playing 1 seed: 12 Pat Rafter. His previous two matches were Voltchov and Gambill
And some of the guys he beat in slam finals had no business being there: Pioline, Martin, Moya in 97.
More guys won slams and made finals in...
I'm not saying your one of these people, but if anyone who has complained about Nadal-Djoker matches of grinding etc also complain about this match then they simply dont like the sport.
This match was kind of old school, a lot of net play, controlled agression at a high level. Andy was...
Man you really kinda wish at these times that Rafa was fluent in english because if he can convey this much insight like this imagine what we could hear if he spoke english like Roger
His mental attitude is simply unmatched, maybe in any sport