Recent content by fed_rulz

  1. F

    Overall, Sampras was better than...

    What a crock of ****! Pete was "naturally" gifted if and only if his serve worked. For his serve to work, the surface had to aid him. Pete's "skill" vanishes when surfaces don't suit him (btw, nice try claiming it takes "skill" to hit winners, but not for running down more balls). Pete is...
  2. F

    Frustrated Nadal fans post here.

    Not true - vs Fed Miami 2005
  3. F

    Such a pity what the powers the be have done to Federer

    No, it's just a figment of your vivid imagination. The 32-seed system afforded easier 1st rounds, but made later rounds (read 2nd round onwards) more difficult (all relative to the 16-seed system). The theory about "dangerous floaters" seeded 17-32 is overblown, and invented to explain away the...
  4. F

    Borg: "That's the best I've seen Federer play for maybe 10 years"

    hey, how about you show your presence in the other epic fail thread that you created? People are asking for you .. :D
  5. F

    If Federer plays like he did today, he will beat Djokovic

    you thought wrong (as always). If you're so confident, feel free to report my "double" account with TMF.
  6. F

    If Federer plays like he did today, he will beat Djokovic

    I feel that's too much of a demand coming from an irrational anti-Fed fan..
  7. F

    Better Server on Grass: Federer or Sampras ?

    LOL, I never have used the ignore list. You must have me confused with someone else. You CAN deny Pete the top server prize vis a vis Karlovic et. al. All things considered (surfaces, returners, strings, etc.), Pete is a slightly better server than Federer - no question about it. But Pete has...
  8. F

    After 2008 Wimbledon final, would you have predicted?

    I fail to see the relevance of your post in relation to the OP's.. Looks like OP touched a raw nerve - honestly, the only thing that looks silly is your retort.
  9. F

    Better Server on Grass: Federer or Sampras ?

    O'RLY?? :D One aspect that's unmistakable to Pete worshippers such as Anaconda is that they talk from both sides of their mouth - they claim Pete is the greatest "true" grass court player (i.e. 90s grass, which was fast and skidding and rewarded first strike tennis), while ignoring the impact...
  10. F

    As many have said over the years, Nadal would have been destroyed by the serve and volleyers......

    Sampras can talk all he wants - he does not have to walk the talk, does he? Frankly, of all the past greats, he comes across as the most bitter. He has mellowed down a bit, but he was insufferable around 2009.
  11. F

    As many have said over the years, Nadal would have been destroyed by the serve and volleyers......

    So you admit pioline and Washington did not face a good s& v'er until the finals? This is a new low, even for you claiming that Pioline and Washington played more aggressive tennis than nadal. I'd like to see the nostalgia-philes explain away Pioline and Washington in Wimbledon finals, while...
  12. F

    As many have said over the years, Nadal would have been destroyed by the serve and volleyers......

    Lol @ the morons claiming Nadal would be a dud on grass, when the 90s saw "giants" like Pioline and Washington in the Wimbledon finals. Did you clowns even watch Nadal in 2007 and 2008? He's in a slump, and I have no doubt he'll come out of it.
  13. F

    Sampras' letter to his younger self

    I agree with you (can't believe I'm hearing myself say that, lol). Looks like Pete is feeling left out of the GOAT club. Pete's problem was his lack of clay court game (movement on clay, patience, decent back hand, etc.), not his equipment.
  14. F

    Why Stanimal Managed to Beat Nole But Murray Failed ?

    IMO, Murray's 2nd serve (and terrible 1st serve %) did him in the Djoker match (like most of his matches).
Top