Recent content by stocchero

  1. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    I took some measurements with my digital calipher (3/9 h and 12/6h, linear distance), and measured circunference in some of my racquets. Those are the results (no replacement grip): Angell L3 B Circ. 102 mm 3/9h 32,20 mm 12/6h 27,50 mm Angell L3 C Circ. 102 mm 3/9h 31,10 mm 12/6h 28,65 mm...
  2. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    I would choose 16x19 It won't be as the graphene radical pro, it has less power. You can go for flatter shots with tc95 18x20 I think would be too much of a change, you will miss some power and sweetspot Enviado de meu Pixel 2 usando o Tapatalk
  3. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    If you want the maximum shift in balance, with least amount of weight, put some fishing weight inside the foam in the butt of the racquet. That way, each 1 gram will bring the balance 1mm towards the handle. But that would, at least in theory, make no difference in sluggishness of the racquet...
  4. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    That is not a bold statement, it is just saying that the Pareto principle is true here, as it is true in a lot of situations. This is just life... Enviado de meu Pixel 2 usando o Tapatalk
  5. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    I really dislike lead at 3&9 I would start with lead at 12 (2 grams) or 5g at 7 inches above the buttcap... It makes sw the same, but gives more plowthrough ( I really enjoyed that placement in tt95) Enviado de meu Pixel 2 usando o Tapatalk
  6. S

    Artengo TR 990 Pro

    I tried Angells several times in the last 4 years. Never really committed to them more than 1 month. For the last 3 weeks, I again started trying them (after one year of using only tr960). I don't know if I will make the change this time. It depends on results... Enviado de meu Pixel 2 usando...
  7. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    Well, I am a little late here, but as I think you made the right move, I will chime in anyway I loved the TT95. But wanted some more power. Tried tc95, v1, 16x19, 63 ra, was very impressed, but could not handle a two set match, was getting tired. Then I measured sw and was like 340 (I like 325...
  8. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    They have different beam width, i think Enviado de meu Pixel 2 usando o Tapatalk
  9. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    I always struggle with lead 3&9 because I feel it slows down the head (compared with no added lead in the same racket, of course) I think what can help you is finding if your racquet is too much depolarized (mgR/I) and then, if that is the case, just add weight in the top of your handle. This...
  10. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    The balance is not important for the swingweight, just important for that tw prodedure (that is just what the swingtool does, get a time for 10 swings, the parameters you manually input, and do the tw swingtool calculation). For example, if you add 3 grams to your racquet head, 12 o clock. You...
  11. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    Mine have a B near the buttcap... Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
  12. S

    The Official Angell Users Club

    Looks like a C shape for me... If remove the base grip, mine pallets have the shape engraved. Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
  13. S

    Artengo TR 990 Pro

    Hope this helps This is my tr990 strung Enviado de meu Pixel 2 usando o Tapatalk
  14. S

    Artengo TR 990 Pro

    I wouldn’t put it in this category, with the likes of pure strike 98, ps97, prestige mp, etc... It has a more squared beam, but not really a boxed beam. It has a bigger sweetspot than players racquets, and can provide more power than those I mentioned. I would put it together with the head...
  15. S

    Artengo TR 990 Pro

    The beam on my TR 960 precision: Tip 22.5 mm 3/9 23.5 mm Throat upper part 24 mm Throat lower part 22 mm I dont know if I have done this the right way, but was with a digital calipher Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Top