To OP’s question: yes and no.
- between ‘15, ‘18 and ‘19 Djoker definitely won one Wimby he probably shouldn’t have won.
- He also blew a Wimby he probably shouldn’t have but for burnout
- Rafa has been hot garbage on grass some years in a way that Djoker never has.
- Rafa has also been...
Fed is the better grass player - even if they tied at 8 - but the margin isn’t nearly as big as some claim. They both have special skills that work well on grass (Fed: serve, first strike tennis, all court game. Djoker: serve, return, accuracy)
Roger has his opinion but it’s easy to say “hold off until conditions are more ideal” when you’re already sitting on Mount Olympus. These other dudes need a paycheck in a way that Federer can it relate. Frankly with Federer in what is likely the final 12-18 months of his career he shouldn’t...
Who knows. I don’t think he’d do better than Fed did, that’s for sure. It depends on which version of Novak you drop into 2004. If you’re putting 2011 Novak there than yah he’s moping up, can’t see him losing to any of those stiffs on hard court. No version of Hewitt or Nalbandian is beating...
... dude they’re better than you lol
You think your strokes are superior but the reality is you don’t have the skill to consistently execute them, that’s why the 4.0s you “perceive” to have worse strokes stomp u