Sysyphus
Talk Tennis Guru
Federer could potentially be playing Madrid without Nadal and Djokovic in the draw...
"Guess I'm not done vulturing clay titles after all."
"u wish"
Federer could potentially be playing Madrid without Nadal and Djokovic in the draw...
Are you unaware that Nadal has played Queen's multiple times and won the event in 2008?
Very soon he won't be. There is 6 years difference between them, the same age difference between Roger and Novak. Novak won't lay a glove on Dom when he's 34 and Dom is 28.Djokovic will chase Thiem to the ends of the Earth.
I think so. Nadal loves to play almost everything on clay.
Very soon he won't be. There is 6 years difference between them, the same age difference between Roger and Novak. Novak won't lay a glove on Dom when he's 34 and Dom is 28.
Wait and see.
I have never seen Nadal skipping Montecarlo-Barcelona-Madrid-Rome-RG. Barring knee injuries, he will play them all.That's true but he does skip some events he could play like Rio and I feel like 4 events before RG is sometimes too much so often thought if it wasn't in Barcelona he might skip it to give himself the best shot at the 3 masters and RG, I think he did that in 2010 and won all of them
I have never seen Nadal skipping Montecarlo-Barcelona-Madrid-Rome-RG. Barring knee injuries, he will play them all.
I have never seen Nadal skipping Montecarlo-Barcelona-Madrid-Rome-RG. Barring knee injuries, he will play them all.
He is not skipping Barcelona, nor should he. No way should Nadal skip the tournaments on his predominant surface.He did skip Barcelona in 2010 though, when he was perfectly healthy and perhaps as a result won the 3 clay masters and RG for the only time in his career, he probably could have done does again if he skipped Barcelona more often. He also did skip Hamburg in 2006 because he was tired after the epic Rome final (Fed also skipped it)
Does this mean we will know early how well RAFA can play on clay and spank Novak's butt early in clay season ?
Does this mean we will know early how well RAFA can play on clay and spank Novak's butt early in clay season ?
Why is he playing Barcelona? Shouldn't he just focused on the Master 1000s alone? I think he should not waste his time on Barcelona.He is not skipping Barcelona, nor should he. No way should Nadal skip the tournaments on his predominant surface.
He is not going to win all Masters 1000 on clay, so he won't be tired. He will lose a match to Thiem as usual, so he won't play all the matches.
If he didn't care about Masters 1000, he wouldn't play the Montecarlo optional, no matter how near it is of where he lives. If Queens were located in Mallorca, Nadal would not play it.
He is not skipping Barcelona, nor should he. No way should Nadal skip the tournaments on his predominant surface.
He is not going to win all Masters 1000 on clay, so he won't be tired. He will lose a match to Thiem as usual, so he won't play all the matches.
Why is he playing Barcelona? Shouldn't he just focused on the Master 1000s alone? I think he should not waste his time on Barcelona.
Why is he playing Barcelona? Shouldn't he just focused on the Master 1000s alone? I think he should not waste his time on Barcelona.
Pista Rafa NadalWhy is he playing Barcelona? Shouldn't he just focused on the Master 1000s alone? I think he should not waste his time on Barcelona.
Even more strange is that maybe his best chance to win a Slam was at Roland Garros. In the year with the legendary Gaudio-Coria final (2004) he almost overcame the somewhat “king of clay” of those days (Coria) in the round before with serve & volley. And he also had a H2H lead over Gaudio. On grass on the other hand there was always someone in the final stages who played the same style as Henman but just better.Incredible the mighty Henman never won a tournament on grass, yet it was his best surface.
Even more strange is that maybe his best chance to win a Slam was at Roland Garros. In the year with the legendary Gaudio-Coria final (2004) he almost overcame the somewhat “king of clay” of those days (Coria) in the round before with serve & volley. And he also had a H2H lead over Gaudio. On grass on the other hand there was always someone in the final stages who played the same style as Henman but just better.
Very soon he won't be. There is 6 years difference between them, the same age difference between Roger and Novak. Novak won't lay a glove on Dom when he's 34 and Dom is 28.
Wait and see.
MC 2008-Madrid 2009 was Nadal's best 52 month period for a reason.
Grassdal won the FO without breaking a sweat, hopped on a train and headed straight to Queens, and won, beating Karlovic, Djokovic, Roddick, Nishikori etc, then won Wimbledon, Canada and the Olympics..... Epic.
Except he did skip Barcelona in 2010 when he was healthy.I have never seen Nadal skipping Montecarlo-Barcelona-Madrid-Rome-RG. Barring knee injuries, he will play them all.
Novak BikeovicIt proves that he lives in Monte Carlo and rides his bike to the tournament.
MC 2008-Madrid 2009 was Nadal's best 52 month period for a reason.
Even I admit it was epic
Novak had a huge burned-out issue after the last "Great Slam" in 2016. He may be trying a different approach this time around. He took an unusually long break after winning AO, and brought no intensity to IW.
I'm not sure if he can be successful in Miami or how to interpret if he loses early again.
But MC will be where he needs to show some of his cards.
So he is an appartmenter, not a Houserer. Shoot. What happened with all of his money? I'm pretty sure he can purchase a house in MC if he feels like it . Has Yelena spent all of the money or Pepe showed up?
I initially thought 2017 Nadal was arguably the best Nadal ever on clay, only behind 2008 Nadal maybe. But then I saw recently the 2012 RG highlights and I think that is the highest level on clay ever produced. Both players played great, but Nadal was at his highest level ever on clay IMO.There is a fine balance IMO. He needs to be playing at a high enough level consistently for confidence/form purposes for sure, but at the same time he needs to save some patterns/tactics/set-ups specifically for RG to not allow Rafa the chance to see them months ahead of time and plan on how to adjust to combat them. I think Novak going all out in 2013 at MC and showing all of his cards ended up backfiring a bit as it prepared Nadal for what to expect in key moments going into RG2013 and may have made a difference in that RG 5th set.
This is of course assuming that the top level between both players is close atm. If we get a situation like 2012 were Nadal was clearly better or 2015 when Novak was clearly better then it won't matter what tactics/gameplan are.
Barcelona is Ferrer's last tournament, so the Nadalistas shouldn't get too excited.
His last tournament will be in Madrid.
I DON'T want Ferrer to face Federer in Madrid. Ferrer deserves to retire in fashion, not looking like a pigeon.In such case let's hope that Federer sends him packing with some bakery products.
In such case let's hope that Federer sends him packing with some bakery products.
Good
I initially thought 2017 Nadal was arguably the best Nadal ever on clay, only behind 2008 Nadal maybe. But then I saw recently the 2012 RG highlights and I think that is the highest level on clay ever produced. Both players played great, but Nadal was at his highest level ever on clay IMO.
More like GREAT album in your avatar
I think Novak going all out in 2013 at MC and showing all of his cards ended up backfiring a bit as it prepared Nadal for what to expect in key moments going into RG2013 and may have made a difference in that RG 5th set.
I initially thought 2017 Nadal was arguably the best Nadal ever on clay, only behind 2008 Nadal maybe. But then I saw recently the 2012 RG highlights and I think that is the highest level on clay ever produced. Both players played great, but Nadal was at his highest level ever on clay IMO.