Rate the 2021 Australian Open

mike danny

Bionic Poster
6/10. Several injuries and poor semis and final.

Tsitsipas-Nadal is the only thing that saves it.

Couodn't watch Karatsev's matches due to the time zone so can't comment on him.
 

van_Loederen

Professional
of course i'm glad that the event took place at all, but the limitations can still only count as deductions in such a scoring.
deductions for the atmosphere (though better than last year, hehe).
deductions for Thiem's injury exit.
deductions for faker's injury fake (it's getting old).
deductions for the time zone.

an upside was that no servebot won the event, so overall in the positive, 6/10.
 

irishnadalfan1983

Hall of Fame
The event as a whole? Wasn't anything special.

Yeah....Maybe a bit like FO - nothing great...Semi’s and final nothing to get excited about - final huge disappointment....Both favourites won....Thinking about it I think it might be fair to say Thiem, Z, Tsitsipas, Med all a bit disappointing in the end....People can point to Tsitsipas beating Rafa but really Rafa should have wrapped it up quite easily in 3 sets...
 

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
I rate it a 6 especially as many rounds were played in empty stadiums. I think the only memorable matches for me were Djokovic-Zverev and Nadal-Tsitsipas. The Djokovic-Zverev match was closer than the 4-set score as Zverev was outplaying Djokovic in long baseline rallies, but Novak won with clutch serving every time he needed it. Tsitsipas of course had a great comeback against Nadal from 2 sets down. On the women’s side, the only match that I will remember after a few years is Osaka saving match points late in the third set to outclass Muguruza.

I have to admit though that I really enjoyed the level of Novak’s game in the final when he administered a spanking to another young pretender. It was nice to see him start out so offensively out-hitting Medvedev to the FH side, then out-rallying him with consistency to the BH/middle before outserving him and leaving him mentally wrecked. His returns were on point as always as Med won less than 70% of 1st serve points serving >125mph after Med had won more than 80% of first serve points in the previous rounds. All hail Novak!
 

Red Rick

Bionic Poster
I rate it a 6 especially as many rounds were played in empty stadiums. I think the only memorable matches for me were Djokovic-Zverev and Nadal-Tsitsipas. The Djokovic-Zverev match was closer than the 4-set score as Zverev was outplaying Djokovic in long baseline rallies, but Novak won with clutch serving every time he needed it. Tsitsipas of course had a great comeback against Nadal from 2 sets down. On the women’s side, the only match that I will remember after a few years is Osaka saving match points late in the third set to outclass Muguruza.

I have to admit though that I really enjoyed the level of Novak’s game in the final when he administered a spanking to another young pretender. It was nice to see him start out so offensively out-hitting Medvedev to the FH side, then out-rallying him with consistency to the BH/middle before outserving him and leaving him mentally wrecked. His returns were on point as always as Med won less than 70% of 1st serve points serving >125mph after Med had won more than 80% of first serve points in the previous rounds. All hail Novak!
I've come to really love Djokovic' return. To me there's nothing that drops my jaw as much as Djokovic returning big servers with such intensity.
 

Nate7-5

Hall of Fame
Would normally be a 6 but the fact that Im starved for live sports with a crowd bumps it up to a 7
 
Not a djoker fan but Really unappreciative people on here calling Djokovic a pusher. He was anything but that. Adjusted brilliantly to the faster courts and did his homework before med.
 
Some great performances (e.g. Tsitsipas, Osaka, Djoko). Some not-so-great:

- the dickbag Aussie fans booing during the men's awards ceremony.
- Tennis Australia's smug, affronted executive Jayne "Karen" Hrdlicka unable to resist the urge to mock the dickbags in return with her "you are an opinionated group.." swipe.
- Both were total assholes.
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
You should never even hint at politics at an award ceremony. It's basic common sense.

And, as for you, you do realise that your golden rule seems to be that foreigners should never talk about matters American from their splendid isolation?

Tad hypocritical here, obviously, but not a surprise.

Some great performances (e.g. Tsitsipas, Osaka, Djoko). Some not-so-great:

- the dickbag Aussie fans booing during the men's awards ceremony.
- Tennis Australia's smug, affronted executive Jayne "Karen" Hrdlicka unable to resist the urge to mock the dickbags in return with her "you are an opinionated group.." swipe.
- Both were total assholes.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
Some great performances (e.g. Tsitsipas, Osaka, Djoko). Some not-so-great:

- the dickbag Aussie fans booing during the men's awards ceremony.
- Tennis Australia's smug, affronted executive Jayne "Karen" Hrdlicka unable to resist the urge to mock the dickbags in return with her "you are an opinionated group.." swipe.
- Both were total assholes.
She was absolutely correct!

She was also correct in stating that Djokovic is the hardest worker on tour, now that Andy Murray doesn't really play.

Djokovic has sacrificed far more than Federer or Nadal has.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
You should never even hint at politics at an award ceremony. It's basic common sense.

And, as for you, you do realise that your golden rule seems to be that foreigners should never talk about matters American from their splendid isolation?

Tad hypocritical here, obviously, but not a surprise.
She didn't hint at politics, she told the truth!
 
You should never even hint at politics at an award ceremony. It's basic common sense.

And, as for you, you do realise that your golden rule seems to be that

foreigners should never talk about matters American from their splendid isolation?

Tad hypocritical here, obviously, but not a surprise.
And as for you, GFY

An oversimplified lie Bottlefed. You get called out when you baselessly pontificate with no grasp of the "local landscape." But that point is moot because a pearl-clutching sanctimonious prig such as yourself is going to prattle on no matter what. It's what the self-absorbed do. And you are self-absorbed; very self-absorbed. Chronically self-absorbed.
 
She was absolutely correct!

She was also correct in stating that Djokovic is the hardest worker on tour, now that Andy Murray doesn't really play.

Djokovic has sacrificed far more than Federer or Nadal has.
She's a Bartelby-esque queynte. And her miffed, snot-nosed "you're an opinionated group" swipe confirmed that.
 

sredna42

Hall of Fame
3 or 4 outta 10.
Zero pulse, fake crowd noise. unhappy players, alot of listless matches,

They should have just played in in QLD or somewhere else rather than Melbourne, which is a broken city now. Like how they moved the Grand Final in QLD.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The pontificating Potty House likes to soil other nests, but defends his own with near fanatical devotion.

And as for you, GFY

An oversimplified lie Bottlefed. You get called out when you baselessly pontificate with no grasp of the "local landscape." But that point is moot because a pearl-clutching sanctimonious prig such as yourself is going to prattle on no matter what. It's what the self-absorbed do. And you are self-absorbed; very self-absorbed. Chronically self-absorbed.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Thanks for that Sky News interlude, but you do realise that Queensland has but one 5,000 seat tennis stadium. Sydney might just have worked. But none of this was realistic.

3 or 4 outta 10.
Zero pulse, fake crowd noise. unhappy players, alot of listless matches,

They should have just played in in QLD or somewhere else rather than Melbourne, which is a broken city now. Like how they moved the Grand Final in QLD.
 

McGradey

Hall of Fame
Best of the post-COVID slams to date, but not as good as the AO usually is. The USO was dire and the FO didn't have any really memorable matches for me.

  • Tsitsipas-Nadal was high quality and the best match of the tournament. Tsitsipas-Kokkinakis, Kyrgios-Thiem, and Popyrin-Goffin were also very good.
  • Karatsev's run was great to watch, especially in the earlier rounds
 
Last edited:
The pontificating Potty House likes to soil other nests, but defends his own with near fanatical devotion.
Hardly, you provincial, finger-pointing twit. Me, I've had the pleasure of experiencing a myriad of cultures--travel broadens the mind you sniveling mistake of nature.

No, more like you arbitrarily establishing your first-person-insufferable perspective as the be all/end all last word. Ah yes, the world revolves around you, a self-absorbed, sanctimonious prig wallowing in the middle of nowhere convinced that your own, LIMITED personal experiences should be considered ordained knowledge. The problem is you're too much of a self-absorbed narcissist that you can't see anything beyond you, you, and you. You: a bag of wind. Or as the Japanese would put it:

. . . . . . . . . . . . "Kaze no fumure"

From_this_bag_the_Night_Wind_begged_a_dream_for_the_Little_Tree..jpg
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 22147

Guest
It was quite boring, really.

2017 was the last one I enjoyed quite a bit.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
I never talk about my personal experiences, Sean, so you must have me confused. I didn't know you were in Japan for the occupation, old-timer. We thank you for your service.

No, more like you arbitrarily establishing your first-person-insufferable perspective as the be all/end all last word. Ah yes, the world revolves around you, a self-absorbed, sanctimonious prig wallowing in the middle of nowhere convinced that your own, LIMITED personal experiences should be considered ordained knowledge. The problem is you're too much of a self-absorbed narcissist that you can't see anything beyond you, you, and you. Or as the Japanese would put it:

. . . . . . . . . . . . "Kaze no fumure"
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
This seems like one of the few good summaries of this issue I've seen. You do really have to compare the slams as they are now, post-covid.

Best of the post-COVID slams to date, but not as good as the AO usually is. The USO was dire and the FO didn't have any really memorable matches for me.

  • Tsitsipas-Nadal was high quality and the best match of the tournament. Tsitsipas-Kokkinakis, Kyrgios-Thiem, and Popyrin-Goffin were also very good.
  • Karatsev's run was great to watch, especially in the earlier rounds
 

ibbi

G.O.A.T.
First week was one of the best first weeks I've ever seen at a slam. Second week was pretty lame. Tsitsipas and Nadal, Garbi and Osaka, maybe Sabalenka and Serena if you want to be really, really generous, and that's basically it.

It's better when it's the other way around. I'd give it maybe a 6. Better than average.
 
I never talk about my personal experiences, Sean, so you must have me confused. I didn't know you were in Japan for the occupation, old-timer. We thank you for your service.
Lance you bitter old queen, you've never traveled to Nippon? Well here's one thing that we sort of have in common.

My sojourn in Nippon was vacation-related and had nothing to do with any occupation.
And you? You have no occupation. Get a job Lance ya crusty old bum. :)
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
You are such a homophobe, old chum, you need to get out and see more of the world!

Lance you bitter old queen, you've never traveled to Nippon? Well here's one thing that we sort of have in common.

My sojourn in Nippon was vacation-related and had nothing to do with any occupation.
And you? You have no occupation. Get a job Lance ya crusty old bum. :)
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The main reason the AO could be given a lower ranking is simply because the overwhelming victories of Djokovic and Osaka seem inevitable and undramatic in hindsight.
 
Enjoyed Kyrgios - Humbert/Thiem, Aslan's pummeling of Schwartzman and men's final. Missed a lot of tennis actually. Watched zero women's matches. 7,5?
 
D

Deleted member 771911

Guest
5.5 rounded up to 6 for Tsisty Vs Nadal.
6 is not very good. Even USO 2017 got a 7 from me.
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
The main reason the AO could be given a lower ranking is simply because the overwhelming victories of Djokovic and Osaka seem inevitable and undramatic in hindsight.

I was rooting for them so their winning was like warm, comfort food. If say Karatsev came out of the blue and won it all, that would not have been satisfying, especially if he never did anything again.
 
Top