FlamingCheeto
Hall of Fame
4 at best, too predictable and Favorites won
Convincingly at all, if I wasn't clear. Their showings are improving, and I believe most of these issues now are mental issues.They haven't even won and we're already talking about them doing it more convincingly?
The event as a whole? Wasn't anything special.
Nah, Medvedev was simply outclassed. Not a mental issue, just an ability one.Convincingly at all, if I wasn't clear. Their showings are improving, and I believe most of these issues now are mental issues.
On a scale of 10 to 10, 10 being stunning.
Pretty pathetic final imo. Tsisipas would have done much better than Medvedev did.
I've come to really love Djokovic' return. To me there's nothing that drops my jaw as much as Djokovic returning big servers with such intensity.I rate it a 6 especially as many rounds were played in empty stadiums. I think the only memorable matches for me were Djokovic-Zverev and Nadal-Tsitsipas. The Djokovic-Zverev match was closer than the 4-set score as Zverev was outplaying Djokovic in long baseline rallies, but Novak won with clutch serving every time he needed it. Tsitsipas of course had a great comeback against Nadal from 2 sets down. On the women’s side, the only match that I will remember after a few years is Osaka saving match points late in the third set to outclass Muguruza.
I have to admit though that I really enjoyed the level of Novak’s game in the final when he administered a spanking to another young pretender. It was nice to see him start out so offensively out-hitting Medvedev to the FH side, then out-rallying him with consistency to the BH/middle before outserving him and leaving him mentally wrecked. His returns were on point as always as Med won less than 70% of 1st serve points serving >125mph after Med had won more than 80% of first serve points in the previous rounds. All hail Novak!
Keep the end result out of the evaluation please and wipe off those tears. We must all be objective and rate it fairly 10/10.0 for being stunningly bad.
Not a djoker fan but Really unappreciative people on here calling Djokovic a pusher. He was anything but that. Adjusted brilliantly to the faster courts and did his homework before med.
Some great performances (e.g. Tsitsipas, Osaka, Djoko). Some not-so-great:
- the dickbag Aussie fans booing during the men's awards ceremony.
- Tennis Australia's smug, affronted executive Jayne "Karen" Hrdlicka unable to resist the urge to mock the dickbags in return with her "you are an opinionated group.." swipe.
- Both were total assholes.
She was absolutely correct!Some great performances (e.g. Tsitsipas, Osaka, Djoko). Some not-so-great:
- the dickbag Aussie fans booing during the men's awards ceremony.
- Tennis Australia's smug, affronted executive Jayne "Karen" Hrdlicka unable to resist the urge to mock the dickbags in return with her "you are an opinionated group.." swipe.
- Both were total assholes.
She didn't hint at politics, she told the truth!You should never even hint at politics at an award ceremony. It's basic common sense.
And, as for you, you do realise that your golden rule seems to be that foreigners should never talk about matters American from their splendid isolation?
Tad hypocritical here, obviously, but not a surprise.
And as for you, GFYYou should never even hint at politics at an award ceremony. It's basic common sense.
And, as for you, you do realise that your golden rule seems to be that
foreigners should never talk about matters American from their splendid isolation?
Tad hypocritical here, obviously, but not a surprise.
She's a Bartelby-esque queynte. And her miffed, snot-nosed "you're an opinionated group" swipe confirmed that.She was absolutely correct!
She was also correct in stating that Djokovic is the hardest worker on tour, now that Andy Murray doesn't really play.
Djokovic has sacrificed far more than Federer or Nadal has.
And as for you, GFY
An oversimplified lie Bottlefed. You get called out when you baselessly pontificate with no grasp of the "local landscape." But that point is moot because a pearl-clutching sanctimonious prig such as yourself is going to prattle on no matter what. It's what the self-absorbed do. And you are self-absorbed; very self-absorbed. Chronically self-absorbed.
3 or 4 outta 10.
Zero pulse, fake crowd noise. unhappy players, alot of listless matches,
They should have just played in in QLD or somewhere else rather than Melbourne, which is a broken city now. Like how they moved the Grand Final in QLD.
Hardly, you provincial, finger-pointing twit. Me, I've had the pleasure of experiencing a myriad of cultures--travel broadens the mind you sniveling mistake of nature.The pontificating Potty House likes to soil other nests, but defends his own with near fanatical devotion.
Agreed it was quite underwhelming.6/10 it was like breath of fresh air but still tennis wise there was so much potential it started fine then picked up midway but climax was really what let it down
No, more like you arbitrarily establishing your first-person-insufferable perspective as the be all/end all last word. Ah yes, the world revolves around you, a self-absorbed, sanctimonious prig wallowing in the middle of nowhere convinced that your own, LIMITED personal experiences should be considered ordained knowledge. The problem is you're too much of a self-absorbed narcissist that you can't see anything beyond you, you, and you. Or as the Japanese would put it:
. . . . . . . . . . . . "Kaze no fumure"
Best of the post-COVID slams to date, but not as good as the AO usually is. The USO was dire and the FO didn't have any really memorable matches for me.
- Tsitsipas-Nadal was high quality and the best match of the tournament. Tsitsipas-Kokkinakis, Kyrgios-Thiem, and Popyrin-Goffin were also very good.
- Karatsev's run was great to watch, especially in the earlier rounds
Describing world travel is hardly sharing 'personal experiences' Lance. And yes, you are confused.I never talk about my personal experiences, Sean, so you must have me confused.
Lance you bitter old queen, you've never traveled to Nippon? Well here's one thing that we sort of have in common.I never talk about my personal experiences, Sean, so you must have me confused. I didn't know you were in Japan for the occupation, old-timer. We thank you for your service.
Lance you bitter old queen, you've never traveled to Nippon? Well here's one thing that we sort of have in common.
My sojourn in Nippon was vacation-related and had nothing to do with any occupation.
And you? You have no occupation. Get a job Lance ya crusty old bum.
The main reason the AO could be given a lower ranking is simply because the overwhelming victories of Djokovic and Osaka seem inevitable and undramatic in hindsight.