Silentchimera
Semi-Pro
Who do you prefer and why?
You need to let go of hairdal. That ship sailed long ago.
You need to let go of hairdal. That ship sailed long ago.
You need to let go of hairdal. That ship sailed long ago.
Yeah OP, why are you hiding results from non-Fed fans?If a mod could change this so that results could be viewable without voting it would be much appreciated. That way non Federer fans could see the results without voting. Thanks.
Yet you talk about them more than their fans. I didn’t like Fed or Nadal and you don’t see me in their threads.That’s like asking whether I’d rather be beheaded or burned alive.
Watching either one of them is a chore and is quite boring
That’s like asking whether I’d rather be beheaded or burned alive.
Watching either one of them is a chore and is quite boring
As if you care about tennis or something. You care about Nadal being the one who stopped prime Federer from winning absolutely everything, and actually showed that Federer can also be vulnerable. Reminds me of those "Federer fans" who suddenly became big Djokovic fans in 2011.Djokovic. He is more complete player. More versatile, more dominant and more consistent than Nadal who really has got all round records. I don't want someone who has won 66% titles on Clay go on to become Slam leader.
I like them both at this point. Really appreciate Novak for his resilience and sticking to his guns and yet a “not complaining attitude” about stuff after the AO debacle.Who do you prefer and why?
Oops. My bad.As if you care about tennis or something. You care about Nadal being the one who stopped prime Federer from winning absolutely everything, and actually showed that Federer can also be vulnerable. Reminds me of those "Federer fans" who suddenly became big Djokovic fans in 2011.
Funny how Nadal's all time records on clay are somehow used against him by haters.
As if you care about tennis or something. You care about Nadal being the one who stopped prime Federer from winning absolutely everything, and actually showed that Federer can also be vulnerable. Reminds me of those "Federer fans" who suddenly became big Djokovic fans in 2011.
Funny how Nadal's all time records on clay are somehow used against him by haters.
Interesting perspective. No question Novak is the more complete and greater player. I just interpreted the question as, "who do you prefer?"Djokovic. He is more complete player. More versatile, more dominant and more consistent than Nadal who really has got all round records. I don't want someone who has won 66% titles on Clay go on to become Slam leader.
Nadal two weeks ago:Nadal and Federer have a pretty good relationship, considering that Nadal came along and ended some of Federer's incredible streaks.
My greatest rival is Novak Djokovic.
Interesting perspective. No question Novak is the more complete and greater player. I just interpreted the question as, "who do you prefer?"
Except that Federer was far past his prime in most of these losses, and should have never even reached the final. Federer himself said correctly that Wimbledon 2008 was his most heartbreaking loss.Djokovic also stopped Federer. In fact he has given us most heartbreaking loss.
That tells a lot about you. And not good stuff.I prefer Djokovic as a player and human being.
That tells a lot about you. And not good stuff.
CAG. His game is a hybrid of all the big 3.Who do you prefer and why?
Federer himself likes and respects Nadal and their families seem to get along as well. They both brought unique and special skills that made the game more popular.Nadal. Nadal and Federer have a pretty good relationship, considering that Nadal came along and ended some of Federer's incredible streaks. This is the opposite of McEnroe and Lendl back in the day. Those two guys hated each other.
Nadal ended several of Peak Fed's streaks, including 65 straight wins on grass, 56 straight wins on hard courts, 237 consecutive weeks at 1, 5 straight Wimbledon titles, , 4 straight years of YE #1(this likely hits 7 straight with no Nadal). Prime Fed had his hands entirely full with Nadal.
no more egg? guess yolk is funny nick too
Well, that doesn’t erase what Nadal said at Laver about Federer - the “most important rival” of his career and “probably the most important p in the history of our sport” - both quotes at the LC presser.Nadal two weeks ago:
Rafael Nadal: "My most dangerous rival, without a doubt, is Novak Djokovic"
A rivalry that is over 16 years old might soon see another chapter written as Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic gear up for the 2022 ATP Finals in Turin, to be played from November 13 to 20.www.sportskeeda.com
Nadal by a mile even if some of his fans give me regular brain aneurysms.
Djokovic. He is more complete player. More versatile, more dominant and more consistent than Nadal who really has got all round records. I don't want someone who has won 66% titles on Clay go on to become Slam leader.
Nadal. Nadal and Federer have a pretty good relationship, considering that Nadal came along and ended some of Federer's incredible streaks. This is the opposite of McEnroe and Lendl back in the day. Those two guys hated each other.
Nadal ended several of Peak Fed's streaks, including 65 straight wins on grass, 56 straight wins on hard courts, 237 consecutive weeks at 1, 5 straight Wimbledon titles, , 4 straight years of YE #1(this likely hits 7 straight with no Nadal). Prime Fed had his hands entirely full with Nadal.
I have nothing against Djoker, other than passing or matching many of Federer's key records. I'm almost over it already. He earned it fair and square. But I want Nadal to get that slam record. Had Djoker come up ahead of time, I might think differently. That's just the way it is. As I said, I really don't have anything against Djoker. He just happened to seriously join the WAR much later in the game. And when we already have our favorites, it's tough to switch gears. And when I went to the US Open a few times, I made sure to watch Djokovic play. You have to. He's unique. He's so fast, that he makes it sound like a car burning rubber when he's on hard courts. It's something that I had to see live. And it's something that my friends who weren't as familiar with tennis had to see themselves.
Lol love the loyalty to Fed all be it deeply misplaced.Fed in his prime owned Novak and Rafa was absent in Fed's prime on Fed's best surfaces. So who cares? Neither is the answer. Fed is still the GOAT. No other tennis player had the variety and game that spanned the eras Fed did.
It shouldn't be odd to see loyalty to Fed when the thread specifically solicited Fed fans for their opinion. You must be lost wading in here.Lol love the loyalty to Fed all be it deeply misplaced.
Fed is the GOAT only in style of play but where it really matters he is 3rd of the big 3
Any ideas about how we could prevent fraud in this thread?As always Nadal fans voting for Nadal to influence the poll. Cheating comes very naturally to Nadal and his fan base.
Fed in his prime owned Novak and Rafa was absent in Fed's prime on Fed's best surfaces. So who cares? Neither is the answer. Fed is still the GOAT. No other tennis player had the variety and game that spanned the eras Fed did.
It shouldn't be odd to see loyalty to Fed when the thread specifically solicited Fed fans for their opinion. You must be lost wading in here.
Only well known Fed fans like me should be allowed to voteAny ideas about how we could prevent fraud in this thread?