Search results

  1. O

    Nole at number 1

    I was reffering to Hitman post regarding 2017. In all other years he was best or second best player in the world. He was the dominant force of this decade, like Real Madrid was dominant force in Champions League for last few years even though they lost few times before final.
  2. O

    Nole at number 1

    He is right. In this decade as whole he was the man to beat. Of course in so long span of time you have few dips, which in Novak case were also injury related.
  3. O

    Nadal News 2.0

  4. O

    Djokovic will not qualify for WTF 2017

    As a Novak fan I surely hope so. The matchup problem for Thiem is huge. To understand this you need to understand tennis a bit better. Thiem cant be rushed and cant play someone who plays flat and deep with a lot of angles. That is why he has problems playing Goffin for example.
  5. O

    Djokovic is so bad in doubles

    Djokovic is so bad in doubles but still beats No.1 pair in the world. You simply dont know what you are talking about even though you try very hard to convince us otherwise.
  6. O

    It will be weird if Murray is number 1 AFTER the WTF but loses the YE#1 to Djokovic

    Murray will stay No1 with losing final with 3-0 in RR even if Djokovic wins but with 2-1 RR. Its 1000 vs 1300 points. On 28th DC points will drop and Djokovic will become YE No1.
  7. O

    What would benefit Nadal and Djokovic the most. Olympic gold, USO or WTF

    I enjoy WTF very much. It is a tournament with great history which all great players won at least once. There is no fluke draws unlike some GS. 2010 US Open comes to mind. So we always have deserved winner on the end and not someone who was simply lucky with the draw.
  8. O

    Predict the winners of the remaining slams and masters in 2016

    Toronto Federer Olympics Djokovic Cincinnati Djokovic Us Open Djokovic Shangai Murray Paris Murray WTF Djokovic
  9. O

    What's up with Novak

    Left shoulder injury.
  10. O

    Djokovic will win 24-26 slams.

    Federer won Wim in 2012 when he was 31 and Stan won Rg in 2015 when he was 30.
  11. O

    Layani notifying Djokovic of his broken string

    The rule is that you cant start the point with the broken string. Before you write something check it first.
  12. O

    The Djokovic bubble, when will it pop? A prediction based on actual mileage

    What about earlier generations? For example Laver winning Grand Slam in 69 after playing more than 1000 matches on tour. How you explain that? Him and Rosewal played more than 2000 matches in their career and majority of them were five setters without tiebreaks. Answer is that tennis is...
  13. O

    The Djokovic bubble, when will it pop? A prediction based on actual mileage

    Problem is that your "predictions" and opinions about Djokovic are always very negative as you don't like the guy and you try to deliberately undermine his success. I will never comment on someone bold but wrong prediction as this is why this forums exist but what I don't like are the people who...
  14. O

    The Djokovic bubble, when will it pop? A prediction based on actual mileage

    I meant that in the process of winning next two out of three he will acheive some important milestones. It was just gentle remainder of few more important records he will break this month.
  15. O

    The Djokovic bubble, when will it pop? A prediction based on actual mileage

    Why its not brave? Did you change your mind about him not winning anything till clay season? I can be brave and predict Djokovic is not winning RG this year but that is not happening.
  16. O

    The Djokovic bubble, when will it pop? A prediction based on actual mileage

    Ok. I say he will have minimum four tournament wins for the season on the end of Miami. As a bonus in Dubai he will become player with best winning percentage in tennis history and tie Lendl record of 18 consecutive ATP finals.
  17. O

    The Djokovic bubble, when will it pop? A prediction based on actual mileage

    Two wins from two tournaments played. What happend? I am suprised that tennis expert like you understanding his game so well can get it so wrong.
  18. O

    When will Djokovic lose his No. 1 ranking?

    No you dont get to my nerves at all. I only hope for your own sake you like suffering beacuse the guy who irritates you so much will be No.1 for many years to come breaking all Roger records in the process.
  19. O

    When will Djokovic lose his No. 1 ranking?

    When you will stop watching?
  20. O

    Something I would like to see people realize: Slam wins should not be everything

    The Slam only logic was invented as you rightly pointed out in Sampras era when he was chasing Emersons 12 Majors. American media needed to justify somehow why he shall be considered as GOAT. If Slam count was so important players like Borg or Laver will fight like crazy to win that one elusive...
  21. O

    Here's how to beat Djokovic... an article

    If Djokovic played in this matches at a great level like in AO 2016 semi or Doha final he will win each time. In sports who is better on given day wins. Thats how it works. And if you look at H2H against all three Djokovic won more times than not.
  22. O

    Realistically, where do you see Novak ending up now in the history books?

    Why if I may ask? You don't like his style of play? Or his looks? Or its something else that bothers you?
  23. O

    Realistically, where do you see Novak ending up now in the history books?

    Why do you think it would be a disgrace? Disgrace is a very strong word. I understand that you as few other Roger fans don't like the guy. I feel that few years ago you also didn't like certain player from Spain but now he don't bothers you that much. I am sure he annoys you much less than...
  24. O

    Realistically, where do you see Novak ending up now in the history books?

    I just wanted to point out that comparing eras in sports is imposible and meaningless as you can beat only the opponents which are in front of you on given day. We shall compare only accomplishments between the players and yes Federer is the most accomplished player of all time at the moment...
  25. O

    Realistically, where do you see Novak ending up now in the history books?

    Because Federer won 12 of his 17 before 2008. You are using the argument of the current weak era all the time but when real competition emerged he won only five more majors and he was 26 years old.
  26. O

    Djokovic dominance against the big four since 2011

    You think that someone remembers today that Rosewall was 4 years older than Laver? Or that 30 years old Rod won against 40 years old Pancho in RG semifinal in legendary 1968? Or that Gonzales beat Laver in 1970 three times when he was 42 finishing 3-2 that year. Can you imagine Federer being 40...
  27. O

    If Novak wins the 2016 French, has he surpassed Nadal?

    That is your opinion. My opinion is that he is better now. This new agenda of how to protect Federer legacy by talking about current era as weak is starting to be annoying. If anything Roger era was weaker. Between 2003 and 2007 Federer won 12 slams. Three came against Andy Roddick, one against...
  28. O

    Federer - 2004-2007 to Djokovic today Win/Loss comparison

    It is important to put it in the contest. Djokovic has better percentage against top ten opposition and doesn't play that many 250 and 500 ATP tournaments. Comparing winning percentage between them in full field tournaments is the correct way to go if we want to identify who was more dominant.
  29. O

    If Novak wins the AO, he will be in a virtual dead heat with RF for career prize money

    He will get 2,7 mil. USD if he wins AO. Difference will be around 1 mil. You forgot that AO prize money is in AUD.
  30. O

    Are we witnessing the death of Tennis?

    I just stated the facts. I understand that truth can hurt but you need to check the facts before creating all this treads about tennis decline and have some arguments or you just look silly in front of everyone.
Top