Search results

Def a legend. 12 slams is no djok

Harrison clearly signals that its out when you watch the video towards the end in slo mo

Is this forum your personal trolling grounds Dark Knight? Why haven't the mods banned you yet?

Actually you won't. If you don't have enough delta V you will crash and burn back on earth, if you have just a little extra, you will be in orbit around the sun for eternity, and if you actually had a lot to break out of the sun's sphere of influence, you will be long dead before you reach...

To be fair to Nadal, he does get the better of Federer on most surfaces because of match up issues.

Nadal is doing all this because he is in a weak era.

Rio 2016, right after he wins the Bronze medal

Why? You seem like a bitter ******* from your post. But anyway, Federer could use some extra rest time, so some good can come out of him not qualifying to the WTF, but there is no way gasquet will qualify over Fed.

Looks like he just wants more time to play FIFA 14

Only 12? I predict at least 37

The way Federer is playing, it looks like gasquet and Wawa will make it, and Fed wont

The guy can still play. When he is playing his game well, he still has the ability to beat anyone on tour. Its just that he doesn't seem able to string together 5-6-7 good matches in a row like used to be able to do.

I don't think most are "scared" to go to his forehand. It would be stupid to go to his forehand, when his BH is so easily exploited

1 AO = 0 slams 1 FO = 0 Slam 1 Wimbly = 10000000 slams 1 USO = 10000000 slams 1 WTF = 345094735039458 slams

If monte carlo doesn't count, then I choose rogers cup

She is probably better than anything you can even dream of getting with

She thinks Ferrer is top 4 of all time?!

It might help a bit with the shanking, but it won't make him gain foot speed.

Laver was good, but I can't picture him beating Sampras or Fed on grass and hard court, and Nadal borg on Clay. He just wouldn't have enough ranking points to be in the top 4 if he played at the same time as Sampras, Nadal, Fed and Borg

We always discuss the current top 4, but who would be the top 4 in the open era? In no specific order my choice for top 4: Federer Nadal Sampras Borg Would have made for some delicious semi final and finals matches.

Nah, Federer cant afford to take a few months off. He is 32 already, taking 8 months off, and coming back at the age of 33 isnt going to help much.

Nah, if they are competitive, they should keep on playing. People like Nadal and Federer are big names. They will sell tickets and TV rights, even if they are way past their primes. If they enjoy the game, they should stick around

No. Its not. Now go away

Serena doesnt need someone to do her dirty work. She can handle business on her own.

I would guess he will lose to Jose Mourinho

All the people you mentioned are above 25. Name me someone under 21 who you think will be exceptional

Annoying in terms of behavior: Djok Annoying in terms of illegal coaching: Nadal

Ok, how about moving to a 2 year ranking system, but removing seeds at tournaments? No seeds whatsoever, #1 could play #2 in the first round. Rankings are calculated over 2 years, but top 4 don't just get free rides into the Semi every time.

better question: How many FOs will nadal have if he had Fed's backhand, and Fed had Nadal's forehand

After reading that post, I think this forum should be pay-per-post