Search results

  1. T

    Do you think Djokovic is legend?

    1555 but, if he wins he will still be 1830p behind No1e in year to day points. 275p from DC final will drop after WTF but before end of 2016.
  2. T

    At this very moment who you rate higher: Djokovic or Nadal

    I had my own system for years, and it is steel the same. To avoid all subjective criteria I create a GOAT point system (but it is also subjective in how much points is each worth). I think this is pretty good at least for compare latest generations (Agassi, Sampras, Fed, Rafa, Nole…). YE#1 - 1...
  3. T

    Who had the best year in 2012?

    NOT realy: 1. Novak Djokovic 12,920 (18 tournaments played) 2. Roger Federer 10,265 (21 tournaments played) Slams: (W,F,SF, F) vs (SF, SF, W,QF) Titles: GS, WTF, 3 Masters, ATP500 vs GS, 3 Masters, 2 ATP500 (so it is WTF vs ATP500) H2H 3-2 GS 1-1 WTF 1-0 M 1-1 W-L 75-12 vs 71-12 YE#1...
  4. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    RG 2010 - only soderling as top10 player W 2010 - soderling and murrey In 2010 Rafa met just 6 top10 players to win 7 tournaments! And it wos his best year! His only 3 slams year!
  5. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    Rafa vs No1e: 2011-2013 YE#1: 1 - 2 ITF champ: 0 - 3 Weeks as no1: 38 - 101 GS: 4 - 5 WTF: 0 - 2 Masters: 8 - 11 T1 titles: 12 - 18 Titles: 17 - 24 H2H: 6 - 10 W - L %: (186-28) 86,9% - (219-27) 89% YE: 2,4,1 (avarage 2,3) - 1,2,1 (avarage 1,3) ... Rafa vs Fed 2008-2009 YE#1: 1 - 1 ITF...
  6. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    So Rafas players outside the top10 is better than No1es inside top10? And in No1es case, No1e (2011) met Rafa himself (in the middel of "his era") 6 times (as many as Rafa met top10 players overall in his best year)!!!!
  7. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    It is very big difference between 7 loses in a ROW in big finals and 6 losses out of 7 matches and 4 slam loses with more wins on masters and WTF events between! And no5 player can't be the best by any standards!
  8. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    Yes, by that logic whole open era is Feds era!
  9. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    About cakewalks: In 2010 Rafa won 7 more or less big titles! It was his best year! 3 slams, 3 masters and atp500! On the road to this 7 titles he met 6 top10 players!!!!!!!! No1e in his 3 slams years (2011 and 2015) on the road to his titles met 18 (3 x as many as Rafa) and 27 (4,5 x as many...
  10. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    You never replayed to me before. And what about 7 big loses in a row to same gay in the middle of “his era”? ATP ranking is most objective to deside who is the best player. And rafa spent very long time as no4 or 5 when he supposed to be dominant.
  11. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    How he can have his own era when he spent much more time as no 2-5 in that period than as no1? In 2008 he started as no2 and finish as no1. In 2009 he started as no1, fell to no3 and finished as no2. In 2010 he started as no 2, fell to no4 and for some period traveled between 3 and 4 and then...
  12. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    Nadal had 3 god years but no era! And it is his bigest issue, when talk about ATG. Feds is his H2H with main rivals. No1es was his RG, now is dificult to find some (slam nr will be if he doasn't imrove it).
  13. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    Nope… Little stats… What is the most defending for a dominance? Big titles and no1 position. If it is like you say that it is: Fed 2004-2009, Rafa 208 – 2013, No1e 2011 – present: BEST - WORST Weeks at no1: Fed: 256 out of 312 – 82% No1e: 202 out of 283 –71,4% (if he keeps it to the end...
  14. T

    Have the past 12 months been the most dominant period of any male player ever?

    Speaking about W/L % as a most significant criteria of greatness and dominants: % W–L No1e 83% (Borg 82,7%) Rafa 82,6% (Connors 81,8%) Fed 81,6% (MCEnroe 81,6) And if No1e have 33% more slams in last 12 months than Fed in 2006 but have a poorer performance because of W/L % than will Fed have...
  15. T

    Djokovic is better than Federer on clay

    No1e 8 clay masters - Fed 6 (the same Hamburg/Madrid) No1e won every masters at least twice, Fed missis both Rome and MC. No1e won against Rafa in every masters and RG (33% of wins, 7 out of 21) - Fed never did it in MC, Rome or RG (only 13%, 2 out of 15). Much beter wining % on clay.
  16. T

    Djokovic vs. Nadal

    No1e has Rafa slam, Rafa never won against No1e in OZI.
  17. T

    Admit it. Djoker is dominating

    2016 Australian Open SF Novak Djokovic 61 62 36 63 2015 US Open F Novak Djokovic 64 57 64 64 2015 Wimbledon F Novak Djokovic 76(1) 67(10) 64 63 2014 Wimbledon F Novak Djokovic 67(7) 64 76(4) 57 64 2012 Wimbledon SF Roger Federer 63 36 64 63 2012 Roland Garros SF Novak Djokovic 64 75 63...
  18. T

    Who is more mentally tougher: Federer or Djokovic?

    Little poor stats. MP in tight match is most about mental tough. Stats over wining the match with saved MPs and losing the match with waste MPs. + is for saved and – for wasted MPs. Federer: 2015: Kyrgios -2 2014: J. Monfils 2, L. Mayer 5, S. Wawrinka 4, J. Chardy -1 2013: T. Berdih -3 2011...
  19. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    you are right. I was looking at 2008 istead of 2007 or something like that, and didnt think... did all realy fast and it can be some wrong... but the point is that Rafa cant have his own era when he never was the best for longer time. (*february 2)
  20. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    To call some period for somebodies era he must be the best for a while. Rafa never manage to be the best player for some longer times period. He had his years when he was best (2008, 2010 and 2013) but not his own era. That’s it. Think like this, you are the best when you are no1 player in the...
  21. T

    What would you generally regard as the "Nadal era"

    For calling some period for somebodies era he most to be clearly best for a little longer period of time. About 4-5 years at list. Rafa never put together 2 years as the best player and cannot have own era. Hewitt had put 2 but it is to little to be called his era too. If you take average YE...
  22. T

    Sampras' longevity is greater than Federer's

    sampras 6 YE#1 (and ITF champ) > fed 5
  23. T

    Since April 2013 Murray is 2-22 against the top 5

    Ivanisevic for example was much weaker #2 than Muzza.
  24. T

    What is your top 7 of open era

    I think that rankings system is very good, best possible right now. Better than any from before. If you want to see rankings over one year. Slam is 2p than WTF is 1,5, masters 1p etc… but it is for one year and that’s no one who think that 1 slam is worth 2 masters if you look at players...
  25. T

    What is your top 7 of open era

    To avoid some subjective criteria I create a GOAT point system (but it is also subjective in how much points is each worth). I think this is pretty good at least for comperation of latest generations (Agassi, Sampras, Fed, Rafa, Nole…). If you look at old rankings you can give points for ATP...
  26. T

    If Novak wins the 2016 French, has he surpassed Nadal?

    GOAT points by me YE#1 - 1 point GS - 1 p WTF - 0,5 p M - 0,25 p GS F - 0,2 p bonus: CGS - 1 p a week at no1 - 0,01 p (100 weeks = 1p) (CM - 0,5 p, CGS + CM + WTF = 2p) If difference between 2 players is < than 1p than you need a closer look at h2h, competition, other titles, W-L record etc...
  27. T

    Federer first to $100 million in prize money

    He would not be even close if you ranks his 2006 season with 2015 merits. No1e make almost 21,6 M$ in 2015, and he won 2 more masters! ATP250 give ca 200000 $ and masters ca 700000$. He come early out of one master too but he won all RR matches in WTF. Everything assuming we are down to less...
Top