Search results

It doesn't mean Nadal's level stays the same though. It's ridiculous how some here try to argue that we shouldn't count the losses to Djokovic as losses, but as potential wins. But then again, what's the surprise if some Djokovic fans hype even 2023 Tsitsipas.

Sorry, I thought you wrote he was expected to win double digits slams. One obviously could expect him to win another slam, but not to become an ATG.

:rolleyes:

And this is why Djokovic fanbase is considered the worst by many.

This post was also made by a Djokovic fan, which is the biggest irony ever.

I guess I don't see well. You couldn't possibly write that. :oops:

According to TTW, even Alcaraz has a higher peak than Nadal.

So when it comes to Djokovic winning, competition doesn't matter, you can only face who is in front of you, right? But for Nadal, you can only judge his level when his opponent is at his absolute best? Nadal played lots of better sets in his career.

He was broken 3 times just in this set. Almost as much as he was broken in 7 matches in USO 2010. Not to mention the rest of the match.

Lol...

Sorry, I misread the comment, thought he talked about Del Potro winning double digit slams. If it's just about winning a second slam, one could obviously expect that. However, he was never a potential ATG, not buying it.

It never looked anything like that.

The whole forum knows that you make bets in every tournament, and get it wrong 99% of the time. :rolleyes:

If you bet on something, a good reason to believe it will not happen.

A special event indeed. I'm pretty sure many Djokovic fans here weren't even born last time when Nadal out of the top-10, lol. Also, when will you learn to write the word 'I' correctly?

Overall the head to head is 2-1 to Nadal though. 1-1 on clay.

Funny how every time one points on your double standards, you immediately start looking for a reason to blame others.

So Wimbledon is not going to ban anyone this year? Pretty sure they will.

Said by the person who bashes Medvedev who actually was number 1, won a slam and has 5 wins over Djokovic. Only in your imaginary world Tsitsipas losing 10 matches in a row to Djokovic (not to mention head to heads against other top players) is more impressive. You are clearly mad because you...

Someone has to be number 2 in this asterisk era. Doesn't make him a strong player. Call me when he finally gets a win over a 36 years old Djokovic.

The fact that even a Djokovic fan admits this comment was absolutely ridiculous says it all.

Maybe Coria was done after Rome? He lost in the fourth round of RG.

"A bit of luck". It's just that this era is so weak that facing Sinner is now considered a tough draw. :rolleyes: Nadal in RG 2005 beat prime Federer, and didn't even need 5 sets to do it. Alcaraz isn't getting anywhere close to a slam win in 2005.

You are the most optimistic person in the world I guess. :unsure:

If you are talented enough then why not.

Anyone but Nole. :giggle:

Djokovic didn't have an off day, LOL.

Well, it's pretty clear why people like Wawrinka's backhand winners much more than his forehand winners, though his forehand is clearly the better and more consistent shot.

Right now there are exactly 6 such players. Djokovic Djokovic Djokovic Djokovic Djokovic And in case anyone missed the point... Djokovic again. :giggle: