Search results

I doubt Djokovic agrees most wimbledons or even most finals are unbreakable in current field

I wish we could see prime Agassi and Sampras take them on

Do you prefer over 97p?

Well true if you count people from the future he will not win the slam race

I don't know whether you're talking about Alcaraz or Sinner

Can't remember for sure but at latest 2013 I felt it was inevitable he'd get the slam record. So somewhere between the 2011 domination and 2013 I realized it. If I remember correctly 2013 was when he started beating Nadal on clay and that made it all the more clear, if he's making it so...

So he's screwed? O noez

To sum it all up in one word... Djokovic: robot Federer: Angel NADAL: BULL

Which is because he's capable of the best tennis ever, but djokovic is just a consistency machine

Wtf where was Isner from 2008 and prior how was Federer not behind him?

Lol the opposite is going to be closer to the truth

Why bother making a point when you can just say salt

Would be great to see how a strong Federer does in this field and upcoming years

He literally got it from you.

Like literally, literally.

He can't communicate in language, he can only number. Its impressive that he's even trying to do more than spam elo numbers for a change.

I agree, nakichet's 40/60 is extremely pessimistic and clearly a self defense mechanism expecting Djokovic to fail so he can't feel let down if he loses

It's so true, I'm afraid you are just going to have to accept the truth of what he says.

You're just not picking up on the intended tone

No nothing wrong just teasing and hoping maybe he'd join in on cheering Nadal >:O

Lmao he only understands numbers, not words. You should try speaking to him in binary.

Hm yea you're right the concept of a disease named mono sapping huge amounts of energy is scientifically unsound and unheard of. Certainly could not possibly make a player unable to perform well over a sustained period of intense athletic exertion.

WHY IS NO ONE MENTIONING MONONUCLEOSIS

You hope he defeats Djokovic at AO to save tennis from boring predictability, right? After all you are truly a noble fan of our great sport above all else... right? You value the sport over your fandom of Djokovic... right?!?!?

Indeed but one of the reasons they're incomparable is one hander is inherently weak to high bouncing topspin. Take Wawrinka for example people generally say he has a great super solid one handed backhand yet look where that got him 3 wins 19 losses vs that lefty massive Nadal topspin, extreme...

Thats literally what I said, 2 hander topspin cannot be compared to 1 hander. How about which statement is incorrect rather than changing the subject to some silly rant about aesthetics and unrelated BS?

But what I said is the truth, any statement incorrect there?

Funny thing I discovered earlier was that although Agassi dominated Boris Becker the very last match of his career was a loss to Benjamin Becker! How poetic. Vengeance of the Beckers

Hahhhhh!! Noles slice is so inferior and ugly and topspin backhands cannot even be compared as Djokovic has never used a one handed topspin backhand. And Federer's topspin forehand and topspin serve and topspin lob are all better than nole's!!!!! And don't get me started on taking topspin...

I don't know its just satire but point is I doubt he worked hard enough to achieve anything near his potential. Can't imagine a guy like him constantly grinding hard to be his best like Djokovic. Probably lazy with practicing and leaving a ton of unfilled potential on the table