Search results

Stay at 2000 but extra points for Multi slam titles.

So 300 weeks is more impressive than 390 weeks because someone reached 300 first. You really lost me here.

Better than those who cant even win in the asterisk era, including your man.

Novak can still beat him on a good day. The problem is as he ages, a good day becomes harder to come by.

Yeah, that's why I didn't feel so bad about the Wimbledon loss.

I don't have any expectations for US open tbh. He's done well this year.

He can win another 1 or 2. No doubt he is getting old though.

Come on Novak. You can do it.

It's a good call. I am glad it's not on a big point.

I like it too.

I am glad he gets it done in 3 sets.

Poor effort from Novak not able to break from 40:0.

Wow, what a brain

Well done Roger.

Let's be clear Nadal and Djokovic play in the same era. You disrespect your man by saying that. I am sorry your man failed to win more in the so called inflation era. You can't pick and choose within the same era. It doesn't work like that.

Doesn't change the fact that women's tennis is a slow motion of men's.

Credit for saying something like that. ATP players are way too nice to each other for so long. We need some spices.

Trust me this generation will be good as soon as Novak retires.

Novak is bothered by the wind, as expected.

Wasn't AO slow from 2008 and speed up in around 2016?

Credit to Nadal but this doesn't make him GOAT.

Sorry Hitman for this mess in your thread.

Hewitt lands way too many balls mid court, which'd be punished by Cilic and Thiem. His serve was weak, he'd struggle to hold serve. Don't get me wrong. I admire Hewitt a lot. I like his fighting spirit. I rooted for him to win the 2005 Aus Open. but it doesn't change fact he was the weakest...

So are you saying he was the second weakest after Gaudio? I am happy to take that. Posting a funny gif doesn't really help your argument. I wonder if those two blokes can still laugh now.

You do realise you comment can in fact work either way. If someone like Hewitt can fluke 2 slams it's the weakest era. His playing style gave him advantage during a transition period but unfortunately his level was average by today's standard.

You can laugh however you want but it doesn't change the fact that Hewitt is the weakest slam winner and no. 1 in the last 25 years.

The fact that someone like Hewitt can win 2 slams and be no.1 is a clear indication of the weakest era. Hewitt would be struggling to make top 10 in today's game. Speed is not enough to save his weak shots from both wings. Most of his shots land in mid court waiting to be crushed by opponents...

Really? Hewitt has weak shots from both wings, inconsistent and tones of UE. Ball placement in the mid court waiting to be crushed by opponents. Weakest ATP serve ever. He'd be blown off court by most top 20 today. Hewitt, Safin, Roddick is the joke generation.

In fact, Weakest era if some journey man level guy like Hewitt can be no 1 and win slams.

23>22>20, USO, if you are still around.