Search results

Feminism is a stupid ideology.

anyone have a link for the match?

Lets just say if pros took creatine you would see ALOT more cramping on tour..

Everyone please excuse OP...... OP got stuck in his time machine and is forever doomed in the year 2005. *Still awaits actual point of thread beside rustling other peoples jimmies...*

I like your list of hate/like players. Very diverse:)

This is why I love 'Bug' Radek. So much fun to watch.

This is standard and typical in China where the state means everything and individual nothing.

I may have just threw up in my mouth...

Excellent video.

was thinking the same haha. stupid question.

Ah the good old days. I remember this bet actually! And I honored it as well PS- You were so much cooler back then FOD. You've changed... for the worse!

As an ardent fan of the Nadal, I hope he does not participate at all... that way he will be more 'fresh' for RG... or perhaps he should skip RG as well and prepare for Wimbledon... but since he is defending champion at the USO he should just skip Wimbledon also and solely focus on the USO...

The look of pity and disgust when the nadal gets aced is truly pathetic.

Very poor thread.

Lets be honest here,,,GS tourneys are the only tourneys that matters (and to a lesser degree WTF)

Forehand of Doom (FOD) AKA WolfmanJack AKA TheLoneWolf AKA ??? persistence to continue to poast on this forum despite having a litany of accounts banned truly is unmatched (ok maybe *** is up there). Got to give this person credit for being such a loyal poaster here by having the dedication to...

The answer to this question is fairly obvious IMO.

The resolution should indeed be Djokovic and Nadal as co-number 1's.

I support anyone who doesn't cheat and use gamesmanship. So in this case I support Novak

Good question OP, And to answer it; absolutely not. It really is quite remarkable how someone in the prime of their career can get wiped the floor with on every surface and almost every big stage an astonishing 7 times

Of course they exist. Nadal's Wimbledon and US Open titles (particularly his '10 win) are prime examples. Every player has fluke wins,,, however just maybe not as large in scale such as the example above.

Overachiever. He is a weak mental midget in contrast to the other big three. He should consider himself lucky.

WOW OP. It was I who actually coined the term 'machine' for Djokovic back in 2011. Here is my original thread. http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=396905 It's ok I'm glad we agree though : -)

You can make a strong argument that has djokovic replacing nadal....

Cheating and doping are two words that go hand in hand when describing nadal so i'm not surprised...it'll all be exposed eventually.

Good one Sid :)

Obviously they are not correct 100% of the time. He did make the final, which is close nonetheless.

This one was so awesome. Reminds me of 1980's cop TV show music

Hardcourt, best of 5...just a different beast in the majors. Don't expect him to slip here. I'm backing him to win the entire thing.