Search results

The bold part says it all about how good Fed is on clay. Making it to the final rounds doesn't count, that's just a cakewalk for a player of Fed's caliber.

He needs to stop dropping sets to nondescript players then we'll see from there. At the moment it's looking very unlikely.

Federer needs to scrap about 7 or 8 years and go back to his prime. Nothing else is going to help him now.

I don't have faith in Federer winning another slam if he has to face either Nadal or Djokovic. I just don't think he can beat them anymore. And it looks as though at least one of those two is going to make it to every single final in the foreseeable future.

Federer chokes too easily. He's only confident when he's steamrolling someone. When things get tough and his opponent gives him a run for his money he starts to break down, so by the time it gets to 4 or 5 sets he's about had it. This is one of the main reasons he has such a terrible h2h against...

and so it remains in 1954....

It would've reinforced his goathood if he had WON the match but he failed miserably. I do agree though that prime Fed would've annihilated Djok, he looked a bit average out there, he can do better than that.

Forget it! Federer had every opportunity to win one last slam and he blew it. Useless!

It was obvious 10 years ago he'd still be up there in his 30's. It isn't really that surprising.

No, not graceful at all, and since she ruined Angelique's chances of winning her first slam, let's hope she loses.

If it is Fed-Djok final I'm rooting for Fed to win it. Nole's young he's got plenty of slams ahead of him. Fed's chances of winning another are getting slimmer each time. Federer needs to win this and secure no. 18.

Federer is in better shape than Agassi was in the twilight of his career and still has a good 3 or 4 years left in him yet to win tournaments indoors and on grass, even Wimbledon. He'll always be a threat while ever he's healthy and in decent physical condition.