Search results

A lot of players look like the hulk when they are making contact with the ball.

Since when is losing to Davydenko bad thing? Davydenko got to 3 or 4 semis of the grand slams last year and is #4 in the world.

Hopefully Young will grow up soon. I have been saying this for a while now.

Nadal uses Duralast.

Few women have the frame to be as strong as Serena Williams.

The writer should be fired.

Federer's lost weight worrying about how to beat Nadal on clay that he needs a belt to hold his shorts up.

I consider golf a sport though I do see where you coming from. Look at Daly, overweight and used to be an abusive alcoholic. Playing golf is a workout and requires practice in the way other technique sports do. Now Bowls should not be a sport, maybe even motorsport to as the only physical...

I hate that Sharapova commercial with the talking dog.

Greg Rusedski. Oh wait...

Sorry but this has been done to death and it takes much more than a good serve to get to top 10.

It's never a good chance to bet on nalbandian in winning a Grand Slam.

Not everyone likes baseline rallies. I hope you realize soon not everyone thinks like you.

It's obvious who the Nadal fanboys are. I don't find this thread that bad. The agenda's kind of lame but it could be a lot worse.

Her nipples through the see through top.

Sampras and Rafter played on a faster grass court without poly strings. Nadal in Wimbledon in the 90s would get destroyed by both of them and today Sampras and Rafter would get destroyed by him. The game has changed that much.

Exactly my thoughts.

It's called objectivty versus subjectivity. Anything tangible such as the composition of an object is something that is objective. Preference of anything (ie opinions) such as what court is better is entirely subjective.

It is a widely accepted fact that concrete is the harshest surface on the body.

It's nice variety from other styles of play and better than boring baseline bashfests on clay.

Yeah Murray is built like me. Kind of tall and skinny and quite weed like.

Roddick has much better groundstrokes than Karlovic.

Kirlienko needs to do some charity work. ;)

That explains the decrease in his level of play.

Thats not the issue. The issue is whether Nadal would be good competition on a real grass court. Wimbledon is to slow and high bouncing to be considered real grass.

I clicked wimbledon just because it is the only one I have been to and historically it has been my favorite so I'm biased. Now however I think it may have to be the US Open simply because it is probably faster than grass now. Slow courts like the French tend to be pretty boring to watch.

Keep in mind the depth in the game has vastly improved. Players ranked around 100 are causing upsets and giving the top players a tough match. And well I guess Nadal finally equalled that. I wonder if anyone saw that coming in 2006.

Here is a comment from Djokovic after his first round win at Queens. "I always look forward to playing on grass because we don't get many chances and it's much slower this year which suits my game," Djokovic said. If this is true I have lost all respect for the ATP.

Actually Nadal uses a pro staff 85 paintjobbed to look like the aero pro drive with cortex.

I know players that do second serves like first serves and sometimes do really well and other times double fault constantly. It is good to have a reliable second serve that will help you everyday. Two first serves don't give you that.