Search results

I would say Nadal. Murray won W 2013, which was one of Djokovic's weakest seasons during his prime, Nadal was taken out in first and Roger in second round. His second W title came in 2016, which was one of the weakest seasons during Fedalovic Era.

Why? I don't think that being considered as top3-6 of all times is underrated. Unlike Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Laver he was unable to win FO, a thing much harder for Djoko or Fed since they're playing in Nadal's clay era. And Borg and his huge dominance during his times. Anyway, most of the...

Excuse me? The only thing, that a new gen is capable of ending, is their own participation in GS tours in third or fouth round. Since Federer and Nadal are far after their peak, eny weaker Djokovic's season should be a huge chance for them. Instead, Roger took 3 slams in a past two years, so did...

Mostly depends of Novak's shape. If he will be in a good or very good shape, it will be something like that: AO: Djokovic RG: Nadal WB: Djokovic USO: Zverev If not, then something like that: AO: Federer or Djokovic or... Zverev? maybe? RG: Nadal WB: Federer or Nadal USO: Zverev As I remember...

Djokovic in terms of achivements, Roger, marginally, in terms of showings. The deciding factor is their semi from RG'11. Anyway, Djoko by far in terms of a chances for beating Nadal in his prime on clay. As a Roger fan, I have to say that: it's a great pitty, that we coulnd't see Novak vs Rafa @...

After 2018 Djokovic won as much GS titles as Sampras, and it might be argued, that The Big 3 are in top3 greatest players of all times. There is no place for either Murray, Wawrinka or del Potro. There is no The Big 4 or The Big 5. Aside of The Big 3, followed by Murray, Wawrinka is a superior...