Search results

I watched the match. And you were wrong to jump to a naive conclusion. Actually, I see your comment as biased. Still, it was just 10 seconds after point end so Cilic had no fair ground of the complaint. Federer did not start walking to towel when Cilic is ready to start the point. So, you...

He won the most sportsmanship awards than anyone. Cilic was the terrible sportsman in this case. Period.

Cilic thinks of himself as one of world's best while he's not even close. Every time he lost a big match to Federer, he blamed something else rather than accepting that he wasn't as goo as he presumed. He blamed blister. He blamed roof close. This time, he tried ugly gamesmanship. The man never...

There is. It clearly addresses this issue.

WTH

Blister. Then, roof close. What a sportsman!

If they were acting, they should win an Oscar.

A moment of tennis at its best, the atmosphere that will never be seen at any grand slam or Davis cup.

If it was a mental problem, like nervousness, rather then physical, would a similar excuse be OK? When you beat someone, and he kept on saying that his injury affected him the entire match, what would you perceive as the message? I used to have chronic elbow injury. When I chose to compete, I...

These are some of his picks this year. AO Finals: Nadal. Indian Wells: Federer not in final four. Miami finals: Nadal Hope that his accuracy continues.:p

In his god mode, I expect Federer to win 3-0. However, in his match against Berdych, 1st set, 4-3, what happened is something that may not be recoverable against Cilic. It is likely that there will be moments when Federer's performance goes off. Throughout his career, he's been greatest at...

I assume that he threw this junk back to press for their offending interview. But if he intends for everyone in the world, he probably has inferiority complex. His money can't turn his brain into a rich's one, but he thought it had! Pathetic!

Sampras's groundstrokes are no weaker than Agassi's. Sampras has no real weakness but chose to primarily charge the net per Annacone's coaching to impose intimidation. Edberg was 2 times faster than Muller and with much more reliable game and attacking variety. Moden racket would just give him...

The screaming ***** was a disgraceful idiot that ruined the ending of a great match. But there are people like this everywhere and in every sport. Davis cup is full of worse examples, so tennis will remain like this. Look at it the other way, if Halep hit back, Konta might've been losing...

In the 3rd set, 4-3, Nadal serving, Khachanok hit a solid return on the baseline at a break point, but got intervened by lineman calling the ball out (challenged to be clearly in). Nadal did struggled with that return and if had broken, Khachanov would've had a very good chance to get the 3rd...

4 > 0 The man was old enough for senior tour, you know?

Deleted

What Cash voiced holds no credit, but it simply tells the world how defective he is.

Thor or Superman is not less real than GOAT.

- Very effective and reliable first serves whenever needed. No service break, no pressure and good tie-break winning prospect. - Rob Nadal's time to set up for strokes. Never let him see early what shot is coming. - Ditch the early return games, unless opportunity arises. Create illusion that he...

Nadal's age biases the average. Another 36 yo finalist would make it perfect. :D

Ah, yeah .. :D

If such a great great great player needs to be so tricky, by sacrificing the chance to build up straight match wins record, ..

To OP. No, we cannot agree.

For OP. Sorry. I don't believe you a word.

A typical effect when the server thinks that the returner is sneaking in - is that he double-faults by hitting it long. But Djokovic has a very precise timing during this time, so he might not make the typical mistake.

Never use one (tried but not preferred).

A cheap trick in saying someone was not that good is to say that the opponent played below standard.

Rankings surely don't lie. It says how many points each player collects. It never says that it can justify who really is better than who. It's those who try to extend its meaning that are inaccurate.

Speed is not the only thing.