Search results

  1. Sandro_Z

    Boom Pro 2024 vs Gravity Tour 98 - too early for a comparison?

    thanks for your feedback; the fact that the launch angle of the GT is higher would push me more to the BP - I will start demoing it next week, let's see how it goes.
  2. Sandro_Z

    Boom Pro 2024 vs Gravity Tour 98 - too early for a comparison?

    Thanks, nice point on the difference between the BP 22 and 24; I had a chance to demo the BP 22 in the past, and I found that sometimes I was hitting long for "no reason". And yes, tjhat racquet had some raw power indeed :)
  3. Sandro_Z

    Boom Pro 2024 vs Gravity Tour 98 - too early for a comparison?

    I think you already replied, and I thank you Let see if anyone else did any test with the 2 frames
  4. Sandro_Z

    Boom Pro 2024 vs Gravity Tour 98 - too early for a comparison?

    Could we kindly go back to the racquet to racquet comparison?
  5. Sandro_Z

    Boom Pro 2024 vs Gravity Tour 98 - too early for a comparison?

    It makes sense to me. When I tested the previous Boom Pro 2022, I found it quite a powerfull frame to be considered control oriented. Had to apply serious spin to keep the ball in. The result were "heavy" deep balls, nice attribute on clay. Also quite "lauchy" at times, but could be my wrong...
  6. Sandro_Z

    Boom Pro 2024 vs Gravity Tour 98 - too early for a comparison?

    Wow. Thanks, I would bet just the opposite, Boom being "power frames" and Gravity "control sticks"; but marketing is marketing ;)
  7. Sandro_Z

    Boom Pro 2024 vs Gravity Tour 98 - too early for a comparison?

    Any lucky one hitting with these frames is able to compare?
  8. Sandro_Z

    HEAD Prestige MP 2023 (18x19) vs Gravity Tour 2023 (18x20)

    Thanks, I've the Prestige Mp test incoming. I read that the launch angle of the new GT98 is much higher, is that true? It should be considering it sounds line a spin friendly frame...
  9. Sandro_Z

    HEAD Prestige MP 2023 (18x19) vs Gravity Tour 2023 (18x20)

    I played the GT, liked it overall, just a bit "stiff" feeling and a bit underpowered. Heads states the Prestige a bit more powerful than the Gravity (400 vs 300 cpi), now can anyone compare the two frames? Thanks
  10. Sandro_Z

    Why not a 2025 PRESTIGE line?

    It looks like Head is releasing a new version every 2 years: Boom, Radical, Extreme, Gravity, they all had it. Why not the Prestige line? Any thought?
  11. Sandro_Z

    Sinner the most boring Italian Tennis player

    To the ones stating "he is German" - Italy is such anarrow and long Country and we have so many different and old cultures here; people from extreme south my be living in Africa and people from extreme north may be living in Iceland. You travel 50 miles north/west/south/east and the local...
  12. Sandro_Z

    Prestige MP L vs Gravity MP

    @Trip I just started to think about the order on the frames I would like to test, and toghether with the Boom Pro and the Prestige MPL, I wonder why not the Prestige MP? In the Head CPI index is listed as more powerful than the Gravity Tour (18x20), and as I really liked it, maybe I should give...
  13. Sandro_Z

    Prestige MP L vs Gravity MP

    Thanks @Dberger820 but I tested the VCore 98 and found it has too high of a lauch angle, in spite of a very nice feeling. Also tested the VCore 95 and liked it much more. Maybe it's for the shape of the head but it plays bigger than a 95 sqi. All in all, I would like to stay with the Head lineup
  14. Sandro_Z

    Prestige MP L vs Gravity MP

    I LOVE this kind of engineering discussion :) Definetly, you're right on the nice feeling of a constant boxed beam. I need to find some time and test again few racquets; Boom Pro as a minimum. Meanwhile, I could also add some lead to the MP at 3&9 and see how it goes with more mass in the head...
  15. Sandro_Z

    Prestige MP L vs Gravity MP

    Dear @Trip I'm delighted by your analysis - thanks for the time you spent on this. Before selling the G.Tour's, I tried some different custom adding lead here and there, but sure when I was getting the nice power, it was at the cost of too high swingweight for a match. If I had only to train...
  16. Sandro_Z

    Prestige MP L vs Gravity MP

    Thanks! I thought the Speed MP may be the right compromise, but when I demoed it... it felt hollow and with a "wrong" combo of light weight and high swingweight. It left me with a feeling like "so, what?". All in all, I don't like the Speed :(
  17. Sandro_Z

    Prestige MP L vs Gravity MP

    thanks; indeed, I'll demo both of them and see how they compare between them and with my actual Boom MP.
  18. Sandro_Z

    Prestige MP L vs Gravity MP

    Can anyone compare the two frames? Especially on power and stability. Head is rating the Prestige MPL as more powerfull than the Gravity MP... Ps: I personally demoed the '23 Gravity MP and I liked the soft flex, but I found it a bit unstable especially on service return. Played 6 months with...
  19. Sandro_Z

    Need some help, struggling to find a good stick

    More and more people at my club are enjoying the BOOM MP, including myself (some ladies the MPL); give it a try, it may surprise you. I may compare with the VCORE 98 that recently tested, and the BOOM has a bit more power, a bit less spin, and both for me have nice damped feeling. Quite...
  20. Sandro_Z

    BOOM MP 2024 users : REAL stiffness??? (TW data)

    KUDOS TO TENNIS WAREHOUSE Today I got an email, they apologize for a problem with their measuring equipment. They found that after proper setup of the machine, now all the BOOMs have RA close to 62 - and refunded the matching service I had. A real professional service - THANKS
  21. Sandro_Z

    BOOM MP 2024 users : REAL stiffness??? (TW data)

    I agree with you, just demoed for 2 wks and it felt ok for my arm. Yet it's listed at 62 RA on TW website, so the above numbers look strange to me.
  22. Sandro_Z

    Customized Head boom MP : the secret weapon ?

    I demoed 2 wks the boom mp, and I did some test adding weight. Please note that I'm an intermediate player, only play on clay so big flat shots aren't that common. 2 grams at 12... Ok for flatter power, but missing some of the easy access to spin. 6 grams inside the throat... Not bad, more...
  23. Sandro_Z

    BOOM MP 2024 users : REAL stiffness??? (TW data)

    Hi all, I just got 6 frames measured by TW for the matching service; all specs are fine, EXCEPT the stiffness that is out of scale I guess :( I know that unstrung frames are stiffer, but over 70 RA seems too much to me. Weight Swingweight Balance RA R1 : 293.7 293 32.6...
  24. Sandro_Z

    Gravity Tour Auxetic Lovers

    I can't agree more, esp on the "Prestige memory" :love: - my only concern, after 5 months of regular play, is that they're not as comfortable as expected (at least for me)
  25. Sandro_Z

    strange specs measure (Head Gravity from TW)

    I come back to this post to say that TW was actually right, kudos to them. I measured weight and swingweight of both my frames, and the numbers provided by TW are right on spot. Once strung (I've String Project Armour Soft on them), the sw rises at 323 wich is ok for me. For the stiffness, I...
  26. Sandro_Z

    Help with grip/overgrip size

    Both pics are the same grip, both without overgrip.
  27. Sandro_Z

    Help with grip/overgrip size

    Both pics are the same grip without overgrip, just different way to handle it
  28. Sandro_Z

    Help with grip/overgrip size

    Hi everyone, let me start by saying that despite being only 1.74m tall, I have always used an L4 handle as L3 is decidedly small for my hand. I "recently" changed my rackets, and in the various tests to find my optimal setup, I realized once again how significant - for me - the difference is...
  29. Sandro_Z

    Gravity Tour Auxetic Lovers

    After almost 15 years out of tennis, last year I went back. Initially hitting with my Vantage frames, I started to demo Head as new frames (consider I was "born" using the first Head Prestige Pro 90). I tested the Speed Pro (really disliked), the Boom Pro (may be my second choice if I was...
  30. Sandro_Z

    Least powerfull string?

    What's your opinion? It could also be the most "dead" string. I searching the string that gives you "the least power for free". Thanks
Top