Search results

do anyone know if it is other cases that players did same agreements with wada as sinner did?!?!?!?!!?

yes it is more suspicious than 2 positive test BEFORE he did it. sinner said himself that fed was his idol but that he concepted his play with nole as a role model. it is nole that he take from every aspect of his game and to take over his team is just a logical decision in the same direction.

he is accused when he is injured, does no matter if he play or retire or take MTO or not he just can not do right. he is accused if he stands with his principles and refrain from slams because he think he is right (and he was). but when others says that they are right and did not anything wrong...

:unsure:

PTPA reactions https://x.com/ptpaplayers/status/1890774503199768651?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1890774503199768651%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=

that is why i think that records that show noles versatility is most difficult to overcome. like all big titles (completing tennis), 2 GMs or more than 17000 ATP points by the new system (for compare sinner had 11830 points with 92,4 W% last season so nole had 45% more points after RG16 than...

superslam including career slam. so question is basically if career slam was more difficult than career slam and additional OG. and nole has 3 CSs, 2 GMs and only one CSS

i hope he can win MC. but even now he still is the only player who won every big tournament (incl OG) and EVERY mandatory tournament thrice (MC is non only non mandatory master)!

and he would have around 500 if not for freezing, W22 points drop and bans from nord americas tournaments. additional sinner was doping positive when he gat over nole as no1.

almost 17000 then but more than 17000 in new system.

16950 and it would be 17110 with the new system (if i remember correctly what i calculated for some time ago) !

fedalooza?

yes ´, he is one title away from greatest of all time at USO despite ban and disqualification when he was a big favorite to winning it.

big3 at all big tournaments AO: no1e > fed > rafa RG: rafa > no1e > fed W**: fed > no1e > rafa USO***: fed > no1e > rafa **W20, ***USO22 ... WTF: no1e > fed > rafaX OG: no1e > rafa > fedX ... IW*: fed > no1e > rafa miami: no1e > fed > rafaX MC: rafa > no1e > fedX madrid/hamburg: rafa > fed >...

yes, despite bans and disqualification also % W–L US Open 88.8 71–9 Pete Sampras 86.5 90–14 Novak Djokovic 86.4 89–14 Roger Federer 85.2 98–17 Jimmy Connors 84.9 73–13 Ivan Lendl 84.8 67–12 Rafael Nadal

we have heart pretty much about it. USO13 is most mention rafas victory (along with W08). as RG 11 is for rogers fans. and after that famous USO13 and 6 (4 on clay) out of 7 for rafa came not that famous 11 out of 12 for nole (nobody talks about it) of which 4 was on clay inclusive RG.

he defeated rafa 7 times of which 3 times was on clay and one of them was at RG there rafa lost only 4 times in whole career. and he won tournament many times both before and after that lost.

3. rafa - fed: 5 MC08 - AO09 4. nole - fed: 5 WTF15 - W19 5. fed - rafa: 6 basel15 - IW19

big3, 5 most impressive streaks: 1. no1e - rafa: 7 IW11 - AO12 2. no1e - rafa: 7 MC15 - rome16

the fact is that rafa has lost early at W i 4 consecutive seasons from 2012 to 2015 to 100+ ranked players. he did not played in W QF for 6 seasons from 2012 to 2017. he didn played W at all in 2009. in 2013 he did not played AO and he did not played at USO in 2012 and 2014. in 2010 he played a...

2011 was peak rafa. if he played better some tournaments in some other seasons is not prove to opposite. we are talking about full seasons and all surfaces. if he played some season maybe better at some tournament and some other season at some other tournament but lost to no top players at other...

on all surfaces in 7 big finals. period is between rafas 2 most successful seasons, 2010 and 2013 and if not for nole, 2011 would be rafas most successful season, so it was peak rafa! it was 3 matches in the middle of rafas only 5 consecutive finals streak in his career. 3 (60%) of rafas...

bo3 HC - no1e bo5 HC - djokovic indoor HC - novak

yes, despite W20* no1e has: same Ws titles as sampras (only fed ahead) more W Fs than sampras (only fed ahead) better W% at W than fed (only sampras ahead) EDIT + 3-1 in h2h, 3-0 in finals at W vs fed!

based on accomplishments it is very true! and, as said, in the hardest competition as well. HC slams - no1 slam Fs - no1 WTF - no1 masters - no1 big titles - no1 W% at slams - no1 W% overall - no1 CC slams - no 3-6 slam Fs - no 2-3 masters - no2 big titles - no2 slam W% - no3 overall W% - no4...

no1e, the big 1, is in the big 3 all times on all surfaces and indoor! playing in the same time as other surfaces GOATs. that is really impressive!

of all 14 big tournaments only 4 is on clay (29%) and 9 on HC (64%). yet nole has positive h2h vs rafa despite they played 29 (48%) of their 60 matches on clay which is more than they played on HC, 27 matches (45%)! at slams they played 10 times at rafas favorit and noles worst slam and 2 times...

pretty impressive, all on clay and in 20-21 when sinner was ranked 75, 18 and 19.

it depend what you mean with pigeoned. - they played a single digit of matches there nole won 4 and roddick 5 one being RET. - nole won convincingly last 2 matches and they played only once i noles ERA with result 6-2, 6-1 (on grass!) for nole. - roddick himself said that he realized that he...