Search results

Please contact me for those grommets. fuzedmetal @hotmail.com (remove space)

sure. just don't be "going out of town" when i call you up. ;)

no prob. don't know when but i won't forget.

yeah, he might sound like one to you. all talk perhaps?

all talk huh? sure i'll drop you a line when i'm in your area.

no, but i wouldn't mind ripping you apart on a tennis court.

don't get cocky with your 3.5 level crap.

2 out of 4 means best? Fed's 1 out of 4 at FO must mean 2nd best then.

d'you mean 'blue moon'? cuz that's the frequency of Fed's injuries.

you know you can whack a serve without doing much but a good racquethead acceleration right? now try & scoop up a low ball or reach for a ball with a bad back. it hurts. i agree with the low BP conversions however.

do a search. every single one of Nadal's losses are due to "injuries" on these boards.

Fed was sweating profusely at AO'08 & could barely bend at Wimby'10. exceptionally bad observations from a so-called tennis observer.

add Murray to the list.

they're the purest competitors. their arch-rivals bring out the best in them. when they're locked-in, that's it, nothing will stop them. but as far as looks & playing styles, i think Nadal is more similar to Agassi: pirate gear, loud colors, unconventional ball-striking techniques, etc. both...

now this is a real headcase. smooth ball-striker but man was he a prima-donna...

yes, Malisse & Gasquet. Federer used to be called "le petit Pete", and if i'm correct, Gasquet was called "le petit Federer". shame that those 2 you mentioned don't have the game (and head) that'd take them to the next level... if the s&v game didn't die out, we'd be seeing more similarities in...

i think it could well be the Swiss thing. Hingis used to be pretty open about how good she was. they're sure not shy talking about themselves. despite all those quirks, Federer has a genuine love for the sport & will be involved in promoting it after he retires from the tour. when i watch him...

no i agree that his fashion sense is questionable at times. he had some weird hairdo even before he became the Federer we know. even weirder is the fact that one of his friends is Anna Wintour... did she not give him any pointers at all? i'm not sure though how much of what these pro players do...

Sampras was my favorite player. he moved like a cat & went for the kill just like one. i'm surprised you don't like Federer as much, the two are similar in many ways: smooth, efficient, with great killer instinct. but i can see why Nadal looks more appetizing to you...

nah, giving tips during the match is much more useful, such as "time for medical time-out" & stuff...

wash his undies, you're the man!

great read! shame that Agassi lost his way early on... the fight for tennis supremacy would have been even more dramatic between the two.

here's a visual from Nike: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRglUBRCxWE

how can it be a good achievement for Federer i wonder?

hard enough to get there, but even much harder to remain there. Nadal will discover that soon enough. Fed's set the bar really high. 1st eight slams are relatively easier to win than the remaining 8. 1st year as #1 is relatively easier than 2nd or 3rd. good luck to Nadal but i don't think he...

hey thanks! couldn't find the 7-page long article about him, only found the clip. am i doing this right?

don't be mean! no-one can keep track of all the various injuries he's had.

Soderling. never touted as a talented player. never thought of as a slam-winner, yet beat 2 of the best on slow clay. found himself in the FO finals back-to-back. deserves a big title.

Gasquet? up 2 sets, lost the match, twice. doesn't have the heart of a champion.

oh neow, he had his own personal jet, no waiting in line there. his own stringer talked about how he loved to travel with Sampras, since he didn't have to wait in line, pay for surcharges & such... just zipped right through.