Search results

He should skip college hockey and go straight to the pros

Is Bruguera/Wilander the greatest volleyer of all time Is Dementieva/Coetzer the greatest server of all time

I agree 100%

you convinced me Columbo ;-)

case closed ;-)

I had a record of 17 consecutive polls, 10 boring in a row ;-)

happy too with several goats ;-) veroniquem question is not about GOAT, but what impress you most and why. to me, Agassi's career slam is the greatest achievement. He's not my favorite player, is not GOAT. don't care. but he won all 4 majors on 3 different surfaces. my Hall of fame.

GOAT is never ending debate. question: what impresses you the most. and why? your opinion. Sampras's record of 14 majors Agassi's career slam Rod Laver's 2 slams Borg`s record of of winning the French and Wimbledon back to back 3 years in a row Sampras's record of six straight years as...

thank U. he was not invicible boo hoo hoo ;-) ! Nadal is invicible until...

Murray looked tired after first set. his face was scary. Gasquet looked tired too after marathon tie break. Nadal looked fresh. don't think Murray, neither Gasquet, can go the distance in 5 sets.

Sampas was invicible at W when he lost to Krajicek.

I love Fed but he lost to Nadal on grass! like it or not, Nadal won Wimbledon. the surfaces are really differents (ask Venus williams !). slower grass is not clay. think it's an argument to diminish Nadal's victory. some will say New York not big apple anymore if he wins USO (and I hope he won't).

Justin G ?

I agree. Agassi had a lot of pressure too. everybody said he would become only the fifth man to win all 4 majors. he looked frozen with nerves the first 2 sets. Sampras had a lot of pressure when he beat Emerson's record at W. he wanted it so badly! if Federer can't deal with the pressure, he...

only Fedex is more stubborn than you ;-) I agree Sampras was maybe better on fast grass, hard-court and carpet. Roger beat Sampras at W but Sampras was not at his best, not old, on decline. and Federer was not the player he became 2 years later. I don't know if best Sampras is far superior to...

a) yes b) no. except if he plays with no pressure a la Agassi 99 (with Nadal injuried/ out of gas)

yes, because I think he would have won 4 FO without Nadal. and I think that Nadal is best player ever seen on clay. (1 Nadal 2 Borg 3 Wilander/ Lendl 5 Federer)

Agassi choked in 90 and 91 finals. Medvedev choked in 99. weird !

yep. prefer Law and order to CSI ;-)

Don't think a woman with kids won a slam since Goolagong at W

Lawn tennis and order

you're right. and I forgot Ivanovic (Choking Award for FO final 07) honorable mentions: Blake, Safina

OMG police veterans patrol let the rookies play kindergarten !

Federer Roddick Djokovic Mauresmo Dementieva Sharapova Kuznetsova Hall Of Fame Novotna (W 93) Coria (FO 04)

I think he had mono in late january, mid june and early july. it's a slam mono, one of the worst. stress, fever, aches, for a few days. ok, mono is same old story ;-) but he caught cold in Toronto ! someone stole his glacier-parka!!!

he was good when he played doubles with Gimelstob

1 nadal 2 ego 3 mono

Federer retired: Sampras and Wilander

Cenc, I think it's more a wish than a prediction. you don't want Fed to threaten Pete record;-) prediction: djokovic wish: federer

Hard-court: Fed Top 5 (4 USO in a row, so far) Sampras Top 5 Clay: Fed: Top 5 (3 FO finals) Sampras: Top 50 (FO SF, won Roma) Grass: Fed Top 5 Sampras #1 Cenc, I don't know who is best player. maybe Sampras played highest level. I think both are talented, Federer was #1 everywhere but clay...