Search results

The whole premise of Federer being the best is now gone. We have seen all his records we thought would hold since 2009 get broken. So we have to rely on arguing the highest "peak" level or "concentrated dominance." Yes, we can say his playing style and trick shots are a spectacle, but is that...

Hopefully both will win and then face off in another USO final tied 23-23. It would be funny if Nadal won AGAIN.

RG 2011 SF: Federer def. Djokovic 7-6(5), 6-3, 3-6, 7-6(5). Can't forget this one.

The AO is probably the premiere hard court slam of the 21st century. I'm a patriotic American saying that, but from a TV spectator standpoint, something about Laver Arena seems perfectly oriented toward exhibiting pure tennis of the highest quality, whereas Ashe Stadium feels off in some...

Just imagine things the other way around for a single moment, and maybe some perspective will be reached. Imagine Djokovic going around advocating for the BAN and DEPORTATION of so-called "fully" vaccinated individuals from their nations, indefinitely. Only THEN would he really be "anti-vaxx" in...

What evidence is there that Djokovic plays better when the crowd is against him? We're gonna need a control group on that, lol. He plays well regardless, but he still wants and begs for crowd support throughout his matches. So clearly, he doesn't believe it's better for them to be against him...

I don't know. From her demeanor, she seems like she might see through a lot of the woke scams. A fearless Filipino phenom! Team Maple Syrup!

40-15 return...

It's a camouflage outfit. He wore something similar at WTF 2015.

He's the only serious pro I've ever watched where I can imagine I'm looking at a club-level player every time he swings. It's incredible. But no, that much head movement is unteachable, surely.

Djokovic spews the truth. His level of play is probably the highest and most consistent ever, i.e. GOAT.

If men and women made the same amount of money, we'd go extinct. Women prefer that men make more money.

He would have been more liked, but not as popular nor as respected. Del Potro is liked, but he only stopped Federer from winning one major. If he had instead exposed Fed over and over before breaking all his records, would we feel the same way? I think not. Djokovic is more respected as a...

Was it worth it to play for so much longer in order to win 3 more slams? I think not. He's been playing all this time to prevent this very moment from happening. But instead he may have brought it about himself. Considering we are purely discussing legacy, let's remove considerations of playing...

You're right, but he'll still win five of those.

I'd rather bet on bitcoin dropping below $1,000 in the next couple weeks than take this bet. Who is going to stop Nadal from hitting 24+ slams based on RG titles alone? This year I lost track of how many RG titles he won; that is how astronomical things are getting, especially for him.

She would be accepted as black in the Caribbean and American in America, but never as Japanese in Japan. That homogeneous nation takes its racial purity seriously. So yes, she highlights the flaws of multiculturalism. Not every culture wants to join in on the fun. There's nothing...

The greatest trio of RG players in the Open Era is Nadal + any two other people in the entire world.

It's not an example of sexism. The second round men's participant makes almost exactly half as much as the quarterfinalist. However, it is off by a sum of 10 once again. Why 37,490 instead of 37,500? Then it would be exactly half of 75,000. Are they aiming to shame second round participants as...

It'll never be over. Don't you get it?

He was more extravagantly aggressive against Federer then because he thought he had to be. Shots like 2:29 would almost never be attempted today except on throwaway points. These days, he would usually spin that ball back, safe and deep, confident that he can beat Federer while taking very few...

How do you think vaccination works? It is to literally spread the virus itself, in "small" or "weakened" amounts, according to the supplier's definition of what constitutes small, weakened, or manageable amounts of the infection, such that an individual's immune system can defeat the infection...

Everyone is positive for that thing. Just take the test enough times, and you'll get it.

It's admirable to lie about men and women being equal in absolutely every way if it's a good PR message that makes tournaments look hip and trendy.

Djokovic sets a great example. We would be better off if everyone acted as he has.

It was the most disillusioning moment in professional tennis for me. Federer choked once again, in the same way, except even worse this time, to the same guy. Federer is not the GOAT. Djokovic's bizarre lack of celebration when winning also put a strange aura on the match. It was as though he...

What dangers? Is he dying, or more so having to apologize and explain himself to the mob, who care more about his test result than his condition and symptoms (if any...)? This is akin to a witch hunt.

Why would this change his opinion on vaccination? He's going to easily gain immunity on his own. In fact, he's already immune, and there's evidently nothing to recover from.

Djokovic is taking it as seriously as Serbia is taking it, apparently. And they're doing fine.

Test him again until he tests positive! Don't you know there are "false negatives"? It's a outrage.