fedr

Discus.

...has totalled 25/76 ~ 32.9% at RG and 11/50 = 22% at Wimbledon; overall 36/126 ~ 28.6% in his last two tournaments/slams; a massive fall from his massive prior figure of about 47% for the season up to RG, well below the tour average of 39% as well. What it tells us? Fedaraz in full flight I guess.

In 2019, Nadal dominantly stormed to the final over Tsitsipas and others, but got harshly massacred by in-form Djokovic for the title. In 2022, Nadal struggled through the draw losing six total sets, but ended up winning against some odds over the current world number one. Yet surely Medvedev...

AO Ferrer: Lost 2011 SF to prime Murray 4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 7-6(2) Lost 2012 QF to prime Djokovic 6-4 7-6(4) 6-1 Medvedev: Lost 2021 F to Oldovic 7-5 6-2 6-2 Lost 2022 F to Grandpal 2-6 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 7-5 RG Ferrer: lost 2012 SF to prime/peak Nadal 6-2 6-2 6-1 lost 2013 F to prime Nadal 6-3 6-2...

Former six time champion and finalist at the tournament who started the year by being ranked 17th without even lifting his racquet. Also beaten GOATs like Safin, ATGs like Mury and Baghdatis, and carrion specialists like Nadal. The tournament’s A E S T H E T I C C champion that could win it...

I chose 1983 as a starting point because that's about when the hierarchy of tennis tournaments began to flesh out more clearly so the most successful players largely moved from playing to win a lot of smaller tournaments, frequently posting over 90, even over 100 match wins in a season, to a...

Top 10: 2021 Medvedev - 1.71 1998 Rafter - 1.66 2010 Nadal - 1.65 1993 Sampras - 1.64 2017 Nadal - 1.64 1991 Edberg - 1.62 2013 Nadal - 1.60 2006 Federer - 1.59 2003 Roddick - 1.57 2007 Federer - 1.54 (The lowest figure belongs unsurprisingly to 2016 Wawrinka at 1.19.) What it tells us...

Slams+YEC+Olympics.

After 150 thousand years of research and analysis, I have achieved it, lovely ladies and gentlemen, fellow ttw posters. Lemme unravel it to you. Fedr means Federer Exlusively Defeating Roger Allow me to present some "Fedr"s to you... Thanks and regards, -Carl Thompson aka...

Enjoy the rough diamond who's in the process of getting polished and being the crown jewel of the tennis world for the upcoming years.

Found this incredible compilation of amazing, mind Boggling shots of the swiss legend roger Federer. No doubt why he is the most adored and loved tennis player of open era. Enjoy the video, dear fellow TTW posters. -Carl Thompson.

The legend of Feder Or The rumour, pesky fedr??

Fedr - 194, between 2004 RG 3R (lost to Kuerten 6-4 6-4 6-4) and 2006 Cincy 2R (lost to Murray 7-5 6-4) - more than two full seasons Borg - 165*, between 1978 WCT Challenge Cup SF (lost to Fleming 6-5 6-5) and 1980 Masters RR (tanked to Mayer 6-0 6-3) - almost two full seasons *excludes two...

Time to do this. Open fire! AO Djokr 2011 Fedr 2007 Djokr 2008 Fedr 2004 Djokr 2016 Fedr 2005 Djokr 2019 Djokr 2013 Djokr 2012 Nadl 2009 RG Nadl 2008 Nadl 2007 Nadl 2012 Nadl 2010 Nadl 2017 Nadl 2013 Nadl 2006 Djokr 2013 Nadl 2005 Nadl 2011 (it's crazy lol) WB Fedr 2006 Fedr 2003 Fedr 2005...

Hence if 2011 was part of Murray's prime, so was the former 52-week period, so he practically entered his prime right away following his first chelem QF at 2008 Wimbledon. It's either both or neither. 2008 Cincy - 2009 Canada Mury results: Cincy W beating Djo Olympix 1R loss to Lu in...

Feder is the ultimate truth and the aspect of human life that leads to heaven. Accept it. Here is the proof. Here's where it all started. Calling fedr is an insult to Roger Federer's greatness. Call him Feder, people. Would you like to fall into the false blasphemy and the devilish trap named...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Australian_Open_–_Men's_Singles#Finals Federer had nice four-setters with Hewitt in 4R and Nalbandian in QF, but SF and F were fairly straightforward. Safin, unseeded after injuries sidelined him for most of 2003, fought his way to the final over Roddick and...

Yes I am. I totally am.

Fedr.

For the purpose of this topic, let's place the relevant timeframe (when Pete was a legit contender) between his first and last Masters finals, i.e. 1991 Cincinnati - 2001 Indian Wells. Let us now examine Sampras's non-clay masters results during that period, by venue. Indian Wells: 2 W (1994...

2017 was EPIC!

Fedr breakdown: http://www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bin/player.cgi?p=RogerFederer&f=Acx2003021020091108qqDWimbledonqq Djovak breakdown: http://www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bin/player.cgi?p=NovakDjokovic&f=A2008qqDAustralian_Openqq...

08 Djokovic added to make it 7=7, given that he did play at a prime level then. Fedr relevant comp: Wim 03 - Roddick, Philippoussis Wim 04 - Hewitt, Roddick Wim 05 - Hewitt, Roddick Wim 06 - Ancic, Nadal Wim 07 - Ferrero, Nadal Wim 08 - Nadal Wim 09 - Söderling, Roddick Djovk relevant comp...

or why the whole business is futile because unfalsifiable. Consider a following list for who had the highest AO peak in the Open era: 1. Federer (07) 2. Safin (05) 3. Edberg (90 pre-injury) 4. Agassi (95) 5. Sampras (94) 6. Djokovic (11) Djokovic is placed as the 6th best - funny, isn't it? -...

This is not one of those threads where the OP wants to start a fan war. It's just about a thought I had while looking at the ATP race list so I wanted to post it here. Anyways I noticed that it's still possible for Roger to end as YE#1 even if Novak doesn't play particularly bad. Again as the...

Ever since Rotterdam I don’t think Federer has been playing as well as he was last year. But considering how well he’s done at Cincinnati in the past I think it will wake him up. So, what do you Fed heads think of his current form?

We all know that @Checkmate has the answer... so, please tell us, who will finish with most Grand Slam titles: Roger or Rafa?

were sponsoring tennis players before? Seriously, when I see people wondering if fedr will be wearing their shoes I'm almost surprised. They've been doing outfits only for 6+ years, you may have just as well expected Novak to wear lacoste shoes. They never cared about the huge demand for the...

For the last two years some of tt member have been on fire with their predictions. The most memorable and improbable so far seem to be those three*: *Though fed's deal is not official yet, @Babolast who's been spot on in the past pretty much confirms it. Also, ignore @Checkmate final...

Federer playing after 2.5 months almost... V/s a S&V player mischa zverev on grass.. What will be the outcome?? Will fedr win it easily or hardly!? Or will he lose it?? (Lul what!!!)