GabeT
G.O.A.T.
Are you a TV pundit?I'm going to go out on a limb and say Nadal will either win another slam or he won't.
Are you a TV pundit?I'm going to go out on a limb and say Nadal will either win another slam or he won't.
Well, he did come pretty close. Can you Imagine what it would have been like without Nole in the way?LOL
Even in the case of Federer. That's why he's won only 1 slam in the last 5 years (will be 6 in January)
He wouldn't apply binary probabilities in the first place. If he did, he woulda got his knees broke on day 1.
LOL
Even in the case of Federer. That's why he's won only 1 slam in the last 5 years (will be 6 in January)
Ask @RF-18, he believes Federer is a better player today than he was in 2005.
It is very impressive but compared to what he was doing in his prime years, you can see the aging process. It's all relative to one's career of course. What Fed is doing would be outstanding for a lot of players but for Fed himself, it's a distinctive step down from what he was doing at his best.Well, I wasn't entirely serious, but if you look at what he's done the past 18 months or so, and compare that to anyone else but Djokovic, it looks pretty ******* impressive, no? And this is a guy who is 34. What has your boy Nadal done in that time?
or just sheer jealousy that his 3 Frenches were left in the dustAll this.
I think I'm also both surprised & disappointed to hear such a quote attributed to Guga, of all people.
Can't help but wonder if some back-room deal for RFTE to help Brazilian tennis went bad, or something.
or just sheer jealousy that his 3 Frenches were left in the dust
I make fun of Sampras when he talks about current players and always has great things to say about them, over-complimenting probably...but classy...thought Guga was the same as Pete, and not a Becker or McEnroe shooting off whenever they do an interview...just my preference...yes, he can say what he wants, and maybe he'll be proven right....of course he could end up like all the folks who said Sampras would never win a major around 2001-2...just doesn't seem to match his demeanor which was always sunny and positive
I wouldn't say Guga is like McEnroe or Becker. He still has more class than them. Besides, all he's done is give his own opinion. Nothing wrong with that.or just sheer jealousy that his 3 Frenches were left in the dust
I make fun of Sampras when he talks about current players and always has great things to say about them, over-complimenting probably...but classy...thought Guga was the same as Pete, and not a Becker or McEnroe shooting off whenever they do an interview...just my preference...yes, he can say what he wants, and maybe he'll be proven right....of course he could end up like all the folks who said Sampras would never win a major around 2001-2...just doesn't seem to match his demeanor which was always sunny and positive
I wouldn't say Guga is like McEnroe or Becker. He still has more class than them. Besides, all he's done is give his own opinion. Nothing wrong with that.
Actually, I bet if a guy like Nicolas Lapentti said Nadal won't win another slam people would laugh at him and say he never did so he cannot judge if Nadal would.
It's best if Guga just keeps his mouth shut.
#diggingTime
It's best if Guga just keeps his mouth shut.
Yep love how this place bashes even the legend Gustavo. Also guga is best friends with Djokovic not fedal. This place is a crack pot zone. LolBit harsh. He said it was unlikely he would win another Slam or regain #1 as long as Djokovic reigned. Well, Djokovic is no longer reigning and Nadal has just made his 1st Slam final in more than 2 and a half years and has a strong chance of adding to his tally on Sunday. So Guga was actually not far off the mark!
Well, until Rafa wins it, is not settled.
1. Lost to Wawa at the Australian Final 2014.
2. Lost to Novak at FO 2015 at the quarters
3. Lost to Fed AO 2017 Final.
4. Lost to Querry at a 2017 final this year.
5. Lost to Fed at 2017 Indian wells Final,
6. Lost to Fed, 2017 Miami Finals
7. Lost to Stan, 2017 FO
So call me not impressed with Rafa on Slams until he does it. Wawrinka, Cillic, Novak, Thiem, Murray, all of them has as much of a chance as Rafa at this stage.
Completed the list.
If I am not wrong, Rafa has a high possibility to ascend to #1 sometimes after Wimbledon if Murray fails to defend it. #1 at 31+ is gonna be an incredible achievement
The man is done. It was good while it lasted, but it's time to let him go. Flashes of the old bull may still appear, but once that aura of invincibility goes (and it has) it's early departures in the slams from then on.
His style of play has burned through him. It was more than obvious a year ago.
As they say, "Past performance has no bearing on future results." The clock runs out on everyone.
Well I said after Wimbledon. If Rafa wins RG and goes deep at SW19 while Murray has early exit, there's a high possibility.No because, most of Muzzas points were in the fall. If he loses at Wembley he would still be at around 8k points
Rafa would have to make it deep into the second week for that to happen. I have not done the numbers. Now, for this to happen Rafa has to win it, and he is not locked to win it until the last ball is played at the final.Well I said after Wimbledon. If Rafa wins RG and goes deep at SW19 while Murray has early exit, there's a high possibility.
Rogi that.LOL
Even in the case of Federer. That's why he's won only 1 slam in the last 5 years (will be 6 in January)
1. Lost to Wawa at the Australian Final 2014.
Unjinxmay kuerten be right...
vindicated!can't wait till Nadal crushes and shatters all of these sad haters once more...
Pat Cash said the same thing.......Will nadal come back to what he was? and Pat said "i doubt it" with a rather cheery tone of voice!Thankyou Biological Passport!
The man is done. It was good while it lasted, but it's time to let him go. Flashes of the old bull may still appear, but once that aura of invincibility goes (and it has) it's early departures in the slams from then on.
His style of play has burned through him. It was more than obvious a year ago.
Tournament isn't over.
The psychology behind why you attach yourself to someone else's achievements does not speak well for you.
yep, and also you were horribly incorrect in your previous prediction.Yep, amazing win and reconstruction of his game and fitness from how he looked a couple of years back.
Nahhh. Just laughing at the "psychology of you eating crow" and pasting it on your face.......
yep, and also you were horribly incorrect in your previous prediction.
the same field that Federer dominated in the beginning of the year...At the time I made the prediction, it was pretty reasonable. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day ("Nadal the Mighty Bull will Rise Again" - all of his fanboys) doesn't mean they're really onto something.
Besides, it's a pretty weak field right now. Even you have to admit that.
the same field that Federer dominated in the beginning of the year...
At the time I made the prediction, it was pretty reasonable. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day ("Nadal the Mighty Bull will Rise Again" - all of his fanboys) doesn't mean they're really onto something.
Besides, it's a pretty weak field right now. Even you have to admit that.