UnderratedSlam
G.O.A.T.
Of course. Ferrer played a similar grueling style yet had no major injuries for much of his career.It was always a myth that Nadal's playing style caused his "injuries".
Of course. Ferrer played a similar grueling style yet had no major injuries for much of his career.It was always a myth that Nadal's playing style caused his "injuries".
He is not blaming Federer, he is blaming people who were deluded enough to try to create Fedclones.Ah yes, blaming Federer for the failures of French tennis. Delusional.
Moreover, coaches in France actually discourage new players from playing like Federer. They teach SW forehands and two handed backhands, and mostly baseline game, like everywhere else in the world tbh.
If you are assuming I am a Fed fan, you are incorrect. I’m not trying to help anyone vent and I don’t have any issues with Simon or what he said. I’m just interested in some discussion and don’t have an agenda or ulterior motives. While I did not post everything he said, it’s certainly not taken out of context from my end. Everything in that quote jives which what he said above that in the article.OP's first post is useless as it takes Simon's comment out of context.
It's basically a thread to help FedArmy vent off some anger.
Simon is the new target. Next month it could be anyone, whoever dares say st that isn't 100% worshippy of Federer.
Besides, we've had this thread already, a few days ago.
Was Ferrer consistently going deep or winning events week in and week out? No, not really.Of course. Ferrer played a similar grueling style yet had no major injuries for much of his career.
Fair enough, if your intentions were honest.If you are assuming I am a Fed fan, you are incorrect. I’m not trying to help anyone vent and I don’t have any issues with Simon or what he said. I’m just interested in some discussion and don’t have an agenda or ulterior motives. While I did not post everything he said, it’s certainly not taken out of context from my end. Everything in that quote jives which what he said above that in the article.
Duh.Was Ferrer consistently going deep or winning events week in and week out? No, not really.
He is not blaming Federer, he is blaming people who were deluded enough to try to create Fedclones.
Huge difference.
Damn, you take things so literally, I fear what might happen if someone uses a metaphor on you."He made us lose twenty years!"
Also fair enough but we are discussing what he meant for better or worse. I can’t help what other people try to turn this thread into. I’m sure Gilles will be fine, after all he’s a big boy.Fair enough, if your intentions were honest.
But next time you'll know that this kind of thread just serves to bash a player, not to actually discuss what he said or meant. That's unavoidable regardless, but you literally drew a target on Simon's face.
![]()
Of course Gilles is laughing his butt off if he's reading this thread, laughing at the FedArmy triggered when Federer isn't the target at all. That's not even remotely the issue here.Also fair enough but we are discussing what he meant for better or worse. I can’t help what other people try to turn this thread into. I’m sure Gilles will be fine, after all he’s a big boy.
Whether he’s correct or not, this is my interpretation as well.He is not blaming Federer, he is blaming people who were deluded enough to try to create Fedclones.
Huge difference.
You're taking the "20 years" too literally.
There is no doubt that French kids might have been influenced by what he's saying since already 2004.
16 years. Plenty.
In fact, the French generation AFTER Gasquet/Tsonga/Monfils is much weaker. That would serve to "prove" Simon's point or at least fits.
Nobody knows everything.You didn't know what his point was and you don't know what whatever you know supports even the argument you are making. Or maybe you simply don't know anything.
![]()
Look at my avatar. Is he an active player?Duh.
He was top 10 for "only" a long number of years, and reached numerous slam QFs... Played a busy schedule every year.
Did you even follow pro tennis before the pandemic? Just asking...
Didn't you claim an hour ago that you knew French tennis better than Simon?
Are you actually implying that Ferrer played MICKEY MOUSE TENNIS at those so-called "MM tournaments" (which weren't)? That he sort of just played 15%, ran far less, hit the ball much more lightly, tried less?Look at my avatar. Is he an active player?
Yeah Ferrer played a bunch of mickey mouse tournaments too, but my point is in the masters and slams he wasn't all that consistent. Kind of like a Kohlschrieber in that he makes the 4th round and then says seeya.
Hilarious... You named THREE French players and that proves... what?I didn't claim anything of the sort, so your reading comprehension is severely lacking.
I made comment based entirely on the facts that contradict just about everything that his "opinion" on the matter represents.
You tried to throw a suggestion, unfortunately it is not clear what that was based on: the reality (of the up and coming young French players that I already mentioned) is even more devastating for his argument. For you to defend his statement means that you haven't watched any of these players play.
![]()
Didn’t see a thread on this comment by Simon yet. Interesting take. I don’t agree with it, but interesting nonetheless.
https://www.essentiallysports.com/m...e-image-of-roger-federer-atp-tennis-news/amp/
Quote in reference:
“For decades, it has been believed that only Federer should be trained. And he, with his style of play, his way of going forward, the confidence he exudes, came to validate these choices. He made us lose twenty years! In France, everyone wants Federer: parents, coaches… We don’t realize that Nadal has won so many Grand Slams (20) by doing something quite different. That’s why it would help if Federer’s records fell because we’d finally have to see the others,” said Simon.
Hilarious... You named THREE French players and that proves... what?
Not sure, but it would definitely be interesting research. I’ve read somewhere that French tennis schools focus more on technique than fitness. Maybe that was in the past and is no longer true or maybe it never was.I think I see where Simon is coming from, but isn't it more of a criticism of French thinking (society) more than anything? That talent and style mean more than grit and hard work? I wonder what you'd uncover if you did some research on France--would you uncover this type of attitude overall? Roger is an athlete so it's pretty unlikely he did it all on talent.
Yeah, you cant play like Fed without his talent, but you can try and play like Djoker and Rafa with effort and conditioning.
Nailed it.I think it's the opposite. Because Fed started to decline, the presumption is that grunting, time-wasting, over the top gamesmanship and only back court rallies are the new norm. He remained popular, but everyone started training like Joker and Nadal.
Of ALL the things wrong with tennis in recent times, of all the issues around the homogenization of court surfaces, and baseline playing style that has killed off all court play, he thinks that it is Federer and his style of attacking all court game that is the problem. Just LOL.Didn’t see a thread on this comment by Simon yet. Interesting take. I don’t agree with it, but interesting nonetheless.
https://www.essentiallysports.com/m...e-image-of-roger-federer-atp-tennis-news/amp/
Quote in reference:
“For decades, it has been believed that only Federer should be trained. And he, with his style of play, his way of going forward, the confidence he exudes, came to validate these choices. He made us lose twenty years! In France, everyone wants Federer: parents, coaches… We don’t realize that Nadal has won so many Grand Slams (20) by doing something quite different. That’s why it would help if Federer’s records fell because we’d finally have to see the others,” said Simon.
Feder goatSimon is 100% correct. The media and various influencers have been spreading propaganda about the so called effortless elegant tennis and how it’s the only way to ensure longevity for 15 years.
Now we can see that, apparently, all they did was lying, lying, lying and spreading agenda.
That is the exact reaction he wants from people like you and me, to gain publicity for his books.Of ALL the things wrong with tennis in recent times, of all the issues around the homogenization of court surfaces, and baseline playing style that has killed off all court play, he thinks that it is Federer and his style of attacking all court game that is the problem. Just LOL.
I'm starting to think the Simon is one of the dumbest f*cks on the ATP. He's more butthurt and salty about Federer than Matts Wilander even, the kvetching poltroon should just STFU, and go apply for a job as Nadal's shoe shiner.
This was a thread about 2 weeks ago. But not ur faultDidn’t see a thread on this comment by Simon yet. Interesting take. I don’t agree with it, but interesting nonetheless.
https://www.essentiallysports.com/m...e-image-of-roger-federer-atp-tennis-news/amp/
Quote in reference:
“For decades, it has been believed that only Federer should be trained. And he, with his style of play, his way of going forward, the confidence he exudes, came to validate these choices. He made us lose twenty years! In France, everyone wants Federer: parents, coaches… We don’t realize that Nadal has won so many Grand Slams (20) by doing something quite different. That’s why it would help if Federer’s records fell because we’d finally have to see the others,” said Simon.
Not a single player who plays like Federer came out of France in that period, so if they were trying that they lost 20 years indeed.
![]()
Didn’t see a thread on this comment by Simon yet. Interesting take. I don’t agree with it, but interesting nonetheless.
https://www.essentiallysports.com/m...e-image-of-roger-federer-atp-tennis-news/amp/
Quote in reference:
“For decades, it has been believed that only Federer should be trained. And he, with his style of play, his way of going forward, the confidence he exudes, came to validate these choices. He made us lose twenty years! In France, everyone wants Federer: parents, coaches… We don’t realize that Nadal has won so many Grand Slams (20) by doing something quite different. That’s why it would help if Federer’s records fell because we’d finally have to see the others,” said Simon.
Geez and you say the VB is illiterate... wow!
Perhaps he’s saying that coaches have only been training Federer’s style of play?Seriously trying to understand, but what is he saying? "only Federer should be trained" ...among other awkwardly phrased sentences
hahahaha what the hellLook at my avatar. Is he an active player?
Yeah Ferrer played a bunch of mickey mouse tournaments too, but my point is in the masters and slams he wasn't all that consistent. Kind of like a Kohlschrieber in that he makes the 4th round and then says seeya.
Perhaps he’s saying that coaches have only been training Federer’s style of play?
It’s not that strange the media and stuff thought Federers way was the best way to play back then. He was THE dominant player before Rafa ruined that dominance. Federer was something fresh and new.Simon is 100% correct. The media and various influencers have been spreading propaganda about the so called effortless elegant tennis and how it’s the only way to ensure longevity for 15 years.
Now we can see that, apparently, all they did was lying, lying, lying and spreading agenda.
It seems like the dominating templates are Djokorray-like "modern baseliner" and/or Safin/Berdych-like "modern ballbasher"all the juniors coming up that I've seen if anything play a lot more like Rafa than Fed.
The guy was always considered to be a highly intelligent person as far as I've heard, but given his comments lately(which could have been taken out of context or be completely lost in translation of course) I'm slowly starting to question if that's really the case. Not to mention the fact that on tour these days pretty much nobody plays even remotely like Fed and all the juniors coming up that I've seen if anything play a lot more like Rafa than Fed.
That you cherry-pick, as usual...?I named 6 French players, three from the old generation and three from the up and comers. The up and comers happen to be just about the best French players that are currently making inroads into the top echelons.
So between these two groups there isn't a single fvcking player that plays a style similar to Federer, and plenty that play a style similar to Nadal, for example.
What do you think that proves?
![]()