0-2 in Wimbledon finals

Carlos I think is the greatest and its a matter of time before he proves this, Fed should have all the records but oh well.
 
Yep.

Now watch half the djoko--bots slink run away like the cowards they are.
But if anyone tries that tack, will get hit back with tit for tat.

also federer won Wim 12 semi (their closest prime to prime match) and never got beaten this badly.

Federer is #1 on grass in open era. Djokovic is #4 overall and 6th prime level wise.

Edit: and there are some so shameless still sprouting BS like its their primary nature now.
 
We knew you Federer fans would do this if Djokovic lost. Lol. Nothing changes today. Federer is still at 20 Slams while Djokovic is on 24, and is 0-3 in Wimbledon finals to Djokovic. Djokovic getting beaten by someone almost young enough to be his son isn't changing that. :whistle:
The barrage will be constant over the next few weeks
 
Yep.

Now watch half the djoko--bots slink run away like the cowards they are.
But if anyone tries that tack, will get hit back with tit for tat.

also federer won Wim 12 semi (their closest prime to prime match) and never got beaten this badly.

Federer is #1 on grass in open era. Djokovic is #4 overall and 6th prime level wise.
Djokovic is 3rd, Carlos might relegate Novak to 4th in the coming years though.
 
fed won eight by his skills
djoker won seven by no challenges around
carlos at least can win six and if he has similar shxt era like djoker, he may win more than fed
 
Djokovic is 3rd, Carlos might relegate Novak to 4th in the coming years though.

No. Borg > Djokovic on grass.

Borg won 5 Wimbledons in a row, 6th wimbledon final -- at his prime. Only losing in a tight 4-setter.

Djokovic won 3 Wimbledons at his prime. losing to Murray in straights and convincing 4 to Querrey and Fed.
4th in 2018 at prime-ish level.

Other 3 are vultured ones.

Also borg beat connors+gerulaitis in 77 and mac in 80 -- wins vs higher level opponents than any Djokovic has at Wimbledon
 
You still have people who think he was worse than Hewitt and Roddick and not even too much better than Med and Zverev for peak level
Carlos might be superior to Fed on Grass for gods sake, 2 wimbledons to 0 at Feds age. Off course hes superior to Roddick and Hewitt they are not even in the convo.
 
Alcaraz proved that he is legit at least and not a vulturer just taking advantage of Djokovic being too old. He could have had an ATG career in any era.

if ATG career means 6 slams or better, then not yet. absolutely not.

3 slams in other eras like Murray for example? Maybe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RS
Carlos might be superior to Fed on Grass for gods sake, 2 wimbledons to 0 at Feds age. Off course hes superior to Roddick and Hewitt they are not even in the convo.
this is unfair
carlos won at a younger age does not mean he is better
 
The hamster wheel keeps spinning. Regardless of the outcome today I don’t think a cogent case could’ve been made for Djokovic > Fed on grass. With both at their best Federer is obviously better by a fair bit.

I still think Djokovic has one more HC slam in him, though.
 
Back
Top