J011yroger
Talk Tennis Guru
Business is booming!
J
J
No, I don't think I will.All of the 9.5 droolers will pay it.
Well, you and I aren't their target market, then. I wasn't planning on it, either.No, I don't think I will.
J
I want more people not to like Pro 1s.
Only $100 less than the new Pro StaffIs it any worse than the inflated racquet prices we've been seeing?
These were originally $130 when they were "current" models and went as low as $95 on sale... $170? Sadly, I'll take a pass.
I'm only echoing why half of the Nike pros, who were exposed to these shoes when they were in production choose to continue to wear them to this day instead of the newer Vapors.I bit the bullet and bought a pair. Say Chin Sin Lo you put me over the edge lol. After wearing them I realize they are the best fitting shoe for me since they came out in the Nike line. All the Nike shores after them are not good for me.
I'm only echoing why half of the Nike pros, who were exposed to these shoes when they were in production choose to continue to wear them to this day instead of the newer Vapors.
Which pros wear the 9.5s still outside of Dimitrov? Alcaraz wears the Vapor Pro 1s. Khachanov is wearing the 2s. Sinner is wearing the Zoom Zeros. Kygrios was in the 11s.
tt.tennis-warehouse.com
These are gonna flop, get re-discontinued and end up back on the bay for $250 in 5 years time.
I don't think they would flop if they were priced a little bit more reasonably and included some neutral colors. I honestly think they should be a permanent fixture in Nike's line. Maybe $130 retail, in between the Pro 2s and 11s. They could rebrand them the Nike Vapor Heritage or something like that. It seems like it would be win-win for Nike, unless they're concerned about them taking away sales from the 11, 12s, etc. Of course, there is an answer to that: make something better than the 9.5 Unfortunately, Nike hasn't been able to do that.