I had to redo mine too because stock grip just made 4 3/8 way too thick imo, coming from Babolats and Yonexes. I liked the way it was wrapped though with extra cover of the buttcap, also extra cushioning was nice. I probably will go with 4 1/4 grip for my future Wilson frames so I don't have to alter stock at all. I wasn't able to wrap my Tourna Pro Thins exact same way. Having thick OG (some ADV Dry FeltTac Ultra) on top of skinny Pro Thin replacement grip is a great combo imo.@alexsoin also to add i hate that Wilson pro cushion base grip. I have issues holding the racquet. In many occasions it’s slipping out of my hand because i don’t feel like i am holding it naturally and with all of my palm surface. That pronounced bevels create gaps between the grip and my palm. It also makes the grip thicker. So i am not even utilising my pro at its highest potential. I am gonna re-wrap it with sublime which is more soft and plush.
I got my strings today and will string them tomorrow. As you said it has started to be selled as wasabi pro. In description it says wasabi produced for mains and wasabi x is produced for crosses. I will string them exactly as you said but in the Nadal version we used wasabi x for mains. Is there any change there or are we good to go. Thanks.Glad to see that other folks starting to like Wasabi Pro (which is Wasabi/Wasabi X)![]()
Should be all good, amigo. Going reverse on Nadal racket is just to tone it down in terms on power and spin, to make it closer to Shift Pro. Can be also achieved by stringing with higher tensions but better for your elbows and wrists just to reverse the hybrid and don’t go over 55lbs.I got my strings today and will string them tomorrow. As you said it has started to be selled as wasabi pro. In description it says wasabi produced for mains and wasabi x is produced for crosses. I will string them exactly as you said but in the Nadal version we used wasabi x for mains. Is there any change there or are we good to go. Thanks.
I'm glad it worked out for you. YMMV obviously but Wasabi Pro hybrid works great for me until it snaps. And in my case it takes 20+h of hitting/playing, thanks to Toroline for making strings with insane snapback and for dense 18x20 pattern of Shift Pro.I have tried it today and it was fantastic. Much softer than Hyper g. Serving, backhands, forehands, everything was so smooth. Lots of spin and power. I hope it will not end soon. Thanks for the setup help.
I have a reel of Big Spin, but not Tour Hex. What would be a good substitute for the Tour Hex?I stand by my mushy, yet controlled, Mayami poly poly hybrid, Big Spin mains and Tour Hex crosses at 47/44, b/c as @galapagos put it, "it inspires confidence to take full hits at the ball".
Unlike @alexsoin, mine doesn't snap, but I better cut it after max 40h (and that's way pushing it past the 20h mark in singles. Some people cutting poly after 10-15h), even if the great tension maintainance Tour Hex has.
Maybe, as I have yet to try Hitt Pro as a cross. I've used it full bed though and although good, is not as great as the hybrid in my sig (that we are talking about).I have a reel of Big Spin, but not Tour Hex. What would be a good substitute for the Tour Hex?
Scratch that, just checked, Mayami Hit Pro lol
Sorry, I meant that I have a reel of Hit Pro and not Big Spin lol.Maybe, as I have yet to try Hitt Pro as a cross. I've used it full bed though and although good, is not as great as the hybrid in my sig (that we are talking about).
Well don't hybrid Hit Pro with Tour Hex as each of them are good by their own in full beds. I wouldn't hybrid them.Sorry, I meant that I have a reel of Hit Pro and not Big Spin lol.
I used to cut my polys too after 10h or so, sometimes even less than that. Ones with greater tens maintenance (like Tourna Silver 7 Pro) maybe 15h. And I talk about 90% single matches or singles practice hitting, doubles is not my thing, play 'em very seldom.I stand by my mushy, yet controlled, Mayami poly poly hybrid, Big Spin mains and Tour Hex crosses at 47/44, b/c as @galapagos put it, "it inspires confidence to take full hits at the ball".
Unlike @alexsoin, mine doesn't snap, but I better cut it after max 40h (and that's way pushing it past the 20h mark in singles. Some people cutting poly after 10-15h), even if the great tension maintainance Tour Hex has.
There’s a shift 99 “soir” for the French. Deep navy blue I believe. Sadly not the pro.I hope Wilson makes Noir version of Wilson Shift Pro by autumn time/US Open. I want a third (and differently looking) frame in my collection. I afraid we’ll see only Shift 99 in Noir only or maybe Shifts won’t even get such treatment…
I couldn't find that Roland Garros Shift but generally the color schemes from Wilson's French Open are usually a mehhh. There's some Blades, Ultras, Clashes like below https://images.app.goo.gl/k1Kv6thyTEuF6mBR7There’s a shift 99 “soir” for the French. Deep navy blue I believe. Sadly not the pro.
It's in the version of the catalog that I have for 2024. The ones you linked are from 2023.I couldn't find that Roland Garros Shift but generally the color schemes from Wilson's French Open are usually a mehhh. There's some Blades, Ultras, Clashes like below https://images.app.goo.gl/k1Kv6thyTEuF6mBR7
FYI - D1 son play testing 315 at a money tournament. Tourbite at 52. Mods: leather grip, tourna overgrip, 7-8 inches lead at 3 and 9. Yes seeing the lead was shocking. He swung it like a champ. 6-2, 7-6. Yes, he was late a few shots. Everything went over the net except a few flat serves. One double fault. I’m pretty sure he gonna make the switch. I think that racket weighs 359 g.
Crosses or mains for the Triax?I have Wasabi/Wasabi X on my prototype Shift Pro and Tecnifibre Razor Soft/Triax on a retail Shift Pro at the moment. If I'm playing a tournament tomorrow I'd string one of them (the looser one) with Silver Tour 7 or Solinco Confidential.
Triax in the crossesCrosses or mains for the Triax?
That’s a beast of a stick, any feedback on how well the shift took on the weight? I‘ve heard from A few people it can be sensitive to modification and that it doesn’t always work out as well as a blade would for exampleFYI - D1 son play testing 315 at a money tournament. Tourbite at 52. Mods: leather grip, tourna overgrip, 7-8 inches lead at 3 and 9. Yes seeing the lead was shocking. He swung it like a champ. 6-2, 7-6. Yes, he was late a few shots. Everything went over the net except a few flat serves. One double fault. I’m pretty sure he gonna make the switch. I think that racket weighs 359 g.
Yes. He lost in quarters to 12.67 UTR. Double faults crept in on flat serves. Definitely a sluggishness/need to get better circumstance. Spun some balls into the net when it looked like he was trying to hit the ball flat. Need serious early preparation on backhand. As you can tell, I’m blaming the player and not the racket. But the racket does produce Circumstances that need to be addressed if you’re gonna use it. He seems to like it a lot. We both started calling it the switch cause I think he’s gonna Shift.That’s a beast of a stick, any feedback on how well the shift took on the weight? I‘ve heard from A few people it can be sensitive to modification and that it doesn’t always work out as well as a blade would for example
I think the additional flex in the racket makes flat shots flatter so to speak. Probably don’t need to cover the ball at all and extend fully. Pure observation of my kid.Early reviews raved about the easy spin generation but were critical of the racquet for being harder to control on flat shots.
Can anyone of you experienced Shift users provide some more details on to this?
The best way is obviously to demo Shift Pro. I liked it a lot, it really helps to add some rpm-s to your shots. And I agree that if you hit predominantly flat, you'd better look for another racket. I'm not a flat hitter and play on clay a lot but personally couldn't fully switch to Shift Pro despite 6+ months of trying due to substantial drag on 1HBH and its weird neck design again was kinda awkward especially on 1HBH. The frame is wide and sluggish, quite heavy at the hoop -> hence the drag; the neck is too wide with 10 grommets making it uncomfortable to hold if you tend to hold high/close to the neck on your takeback. I see they are on heavy discount right now at TW, I would go for Pure Strike 18x20 instead which is on heavy discount now as well. Pretty comparable but PS is more consistent and robust, easier to use with 1HBH.Heavy discounts on the line right now.
Without having to read 20+ pages of feedback, what were the biggest complaints regarding the version with 18 mains?
They clearly hadn't been selling well if they all ended up on discount but the specs are right up my alley.
Is the feel too weird/odd?
Thank you.
This is the kind of feedback that I was looking for!substantial drag on 1HBH and its weird neck design again was kinda awkward especially on 1HBH. The frame is wide and sluggish, quite heavy at the hoop -> hence the drag; the neck is too wide with 10 grommets making it uncomfortable to hold if you tend to hold high/close to the neck on your takeback.
No, this frame was great on my heavy topspin forehands and all three types of serves. I also liked the feel for backhand slices, volleys and dropshots. It's more of a flatter one-hander issue with head-heavy, wide-hoop and/or large head-size frames. In comparison Pure Strike 18x20 is much easier to use with 1HBH despite practically the same specs (narrower beam and slightly smaller head makes a big difference), my current Vcore 95s are like 10 times easier for one-handersI never heard of "substantial drag" though. Can you elaborate on that part specifically? I use a O.H.B.H.
Does this drag not bother you on any other stroke?
Apparently, huh? Only slightly thinner/smaller yet still yields a noticeable effect. I always found smaller heads to be better on offense, counterpunches, serves, volleys, slice, and single handed backhands so your comparison with the Pure Strike checks out.narrower beam and slightly smaller head makes a big difference
I can hit loopy backhand with a ton of spin too especially on clay. The problem with Shift Pro was a different response if you hit dead flat like shallowed swing (blocking big serve, passing shot half volley) vs if you hit with a big loopy swing. The second option feels way nicer silky smooth on contact while dead flat ones feel pretty harsh especially if you hit even slightly out of its tiny sweet spot. And it makes sense that it affects 1HBHs more than forehands, it’s pretty easy at least to create some wrist action and vertical swing path on modern/next gen forehands.Apparently, huh? Only slightly thinner/smaller yet still yields a noticeable effect. I always found smaller heads to be better on offense, counterpunches, serves, volleys, slice, and single handed backhands so your comparison with the Pure Strike checks out.
Does it (the Shift) negatively affect your OHBH on high, low, or ALL flatly struck backhands?
I wonder if it affects people with a loopier OHBHs like it does with flat ones such as yours.
I can already imagine it. I think you are saying it is a night and day difference. Thank yousilky
I'm a huge fan of the Shift Pro (but not the regular Shift). It produces excellent spin (despite the 18x20 pattern), and decent mass-based power, but it also has good control and flattens out the ball much better than any spin frame I know. I think some people complained about comfort when hitting flat, but I didn't have an issue there; something to consider if you have a sensitive arm. I liken the regular Shift to the 100' Aero, and the Shift Pro to the Aero 98; I think the Shift Pro has better spin and better flat balls than the Aero 98, but less power. (I haven't used the Aero 98 a whole lot, so I may be offbase with that comparison.) The one downside might be that it has a bit of a small sweet spot in my experience, but otherwise it serves well, volleys well, is quite stable, has good plow, and great spin. Underrated frame in my view.Heavy discounts on the line right now.
Without having to read 20+ pages of feedback, what were the biggest complaints regarding the version with 18 mains?
They clearly hadn't been selling well if they all ended up on discount but the specs are right up my alley.
Is the feel too weird/odd?
Thank you.
I have both and still plays a lot with the 300g 16x20 shift. To me the biggest downside of the 18x20 shift pro is the maneuverability. It comes in heavy enough that with the extra strings you are pushing 330 swingweight on a slightly underspec one I tried to find. But it plays slower than that number suggest as the beam is thicker and not as aerodynamic as other thinner frames in that swingweight class. It’s a frame that rewards high racquet head speed but accelerating that is quite demanding for me despite having used other frames in similar spec in the past.Heavy discounts on the line right now.
Without having to read 20+ pages of feedback, what were the biggest complaints regarding the version with 18 mains?
They clearly hadn't been selling well if they all ended up on discount but the specs are right up my alley.
Is the feel too weird/odd?
Thank you.
Something I really enjoy from the Shift line is that difference in feel when you go flat vs. topspin strokes. It takes some getting used to for sure. But basically you get slightly longer dwell time and “less harsh” impact on more vertical swings but when you go flat it has such a satisfying responsive pop that makes the ball shoot out of your strings a bit faster like in a stiffer power frame that you won’t find in a Pure Aero racquet. Testing it against other frames on the market I definitely would not say it is as dampened as most. So comfort can be an issue for some with higher tensions.I can already imagine it. I think you are saying it is a night and day difference. Thank you