passive_aggressive
Banned
I feel like with the 2hbh, the stroke is more compact, and if you're hitting a kick serve or very loopy ball above shoulder height, the stroke is almost finished by the time it gets that high, therefore there is not much range of motion left in the stroke to brush up on the ball and topspin it back.
With the one hander I can topspin the high balls back because the stroke is longer and can finish much higher than with the 2hbh. Therefore there is room in the stroke to brush up on the ball.
Why is it said that 2hbh is much better for high balls? Are you meant to hit the high balls very flat with the 2hbh - sort of muscle it back flat with a downwards slapping motion?
If it helps you understand my problem, with the one hander I use extreme eastern grip (same as semi-western 1hbh grip), with the 2hbh, I use extreme eastern 1hbh grip on the right hand and western forehand grip on the left hand.
With the one hander I can topspin the high balls back because the stroke is longer and can finish much higher than with the 2hbh. Therefore there is room in the stroke to brush up on the ball.
Why is it said that 2hbh is much better for high balls? Are you meant to hit the high balls very flat with the 2hbh - sort of muscle it back flat with a downwards slapping motion?
If it helps you understand my problem, with the one hander I use extreme eastern grip (same as semi-western 1hbh grip), with the 2hbh, I use extreme eastern 1hbh grip on the right hand and western forehand grip on the left hand.