Of course I consider it a fluke, since it was a fluke. He has never approached anywhere near that calibre of play or focus at any other time in his career so why should anyone look at it as anything other a fluke.
If he doesnt embarass himself if he ever makes another 1000 final (forget ever making a slam final), and beats a couple top 5 players when they are in half decent form, then I might respect him a bit more. Good luck with that though.
Monte Carlo can hardly even qualify as a Masters event when only 3 of the top 8 were even in the field (and 2 of the 3 can barely hold a racquet straight at the moment). Dont expect people to be awed by that showing, especialy after that disgrace of a final.
The depth of your logic is amazing. You truly are brilliant, aren't you?
Verdasco, which has been in (or close to the) Top 10 for over 1 year now, is a clown. Good, good.
And every player who doesn't have a MS 1000 title is a clown as well? You mean, like Soderling? So Rafa must be the anti-clown then (since he has 16 MS titles at age 24.)
I'd like to see you playing tennis. It must be quite a sight. The fact that you disrespect someone like Verdasco, who has achieved more than you could ever dream of, by calling him a clown, tells me though that there wouldn't be a red nose big enough in the world to make justice to your abilities. It also tells me you probably have never played tennis (or that if you have, you sucked so bad that quit after a few games.) LMFAO.
