20-20-20 would have easily been 15-15-15 or even lesser with faster courts

Start da Game

Hall of Fame
we saw what happened when us open was sped up slightly........it took novak 17 hrs of court time just to get to the final and he was thwarted in the final when his opponent utilized court speed to his advantage.......i always felt dogopolov, janowicz and the likes got robbed by the slowness of courts........roddick was the first one to be denied at wimbledon........so if courts were sped up around 2010, i don't think we would have had the holy trinity of this generation sitting at 20-20-20.......
 
we saw what happened when us open was sped up slightly........it took novak 17 hrs of court time just to get to the final and he was thwarted in the final when his opponent utilized court speed to his advantage.......i always felt dogopolov, janowicz and the likes got robbed by the slowness of courts........roddick was the first one to be denied at wimbledon........so if courts were sped up around 2010, i don't think we would have had the holy trinity of this generation sitting at 20-20-20.......
I'm not sure about that but I do despise the slower courts. It really makes the game incredibly boring. It would be great if there were at least one slam with considerable speed to separate the men from the boys but the will of the ATP is to beat you to death with endless 5 hour brainless rallies.
 
Top