But how was Murray better on HCs? AO lost to the winner: Nadal lost to eventual finalist.No give grass too to Nadal, I'm sure you can find a way.
of course it isn’t about FedererIt is an unquestionable fact that the best players between 14-16 were more consistent and reliable than the best players between 04-06. And that's the best reason to believe that era was stronger than the other one.Doesn't matter. That's not the topic of the thread.
The insecurity of Fed fans on fire as usual today. You've taken a thread about which era had tougher competition and made it into a question about whether the players in the second era would beat Federer if they played in the first one. Heads up: this thread isn't about Federer.