2010 NCAA D1 Tennis Champs team draws posted

OK, now it is time for Bradley Klahn to shine. Brad will dominate in singles and doubles in coming week and bring home the title anyway.............
 
Double WOW! didn't realize Oklahoma was that solid... Texas is always a threat to take the whole tourney. didn't see that one coming.

No one saw it coming. Texas beat Oklahoma 6-1 in the regular season. At 3/4/6 Texas won in straight sets, and then lost all three of those spots last night in the rematch, even losing 3/4 in straight sets. What a turnaround.
 
Farah & Johnson (#2) take #1 doubles vs Buchanan & Marcan (#9) 8 games to 6. USC takes the doubles point for an early 1-0 lead going into singles.
 
Last edited:
Wow. SC is owning 1st set in singles. On every court - SC is @ 5 games, closest being court 5 @ 5-3. Farah up 5-0 against Buchanan.
 
4-0 USC....Buckeyes again get off to a slow start and it kills them. Allare was up a set and ready to close the match out and Kronague was up in the second.
 
Was lucky for SC that Farah closed out #1 when he did. Momentum was starting to shift as OSU was close to winning 2nd set of remaining matches, and taking #5. Not to say that it would be easy to win all those matches - though if Buchanan took 2nd set @ 1 and OSU won 5 it would be a big momentum shift into a dramatic finish.

Amazed at how significant winning the #1 doubles was. Glad to see at least one PAC-10 team in Final Four, K_I
 
Last edited:
UVA : UCLA going on now. UCLA takes the doubles point, and looked like UVA was gonna roll in singles. Now it looks like after 1st set - UVA takes 3 1st sets and UCLA just pulled off 1st sets @ 3, 5, and 6.

I didn't think it 20 mins ago - looks like UCLA has a shot; it would help if Inbar takes 2nd set @ #4.
 
Doubles is THE KEY when top teams play each other. Last year, if USC didn't win the doubles at 3, they would have had no chance against that Ohio State lineup.

UCLA is as talented as advertised and seems to bring it in big matches. Them winning doubles is huge. I am already wrong on one prediction but I don't think I'll be wrong again today.
 
UVA : UCLA going on now. UCLA takes the doubles point, and looked like UVA was gonna roll in singles. Now it looks like after 1st set - UVA takes 3 1st sets and UCLA just pulled off 1st sets @ 3, 5, and 6.

I didn't think it 20 mins ago - looks like UCLA has a shot; it would help if Inbar takes 2nd set @ #4.

one of the top coaches in college tennis that I am good friends with told me that it is all about individual matchups at NCAAs. That is why I have seen some teams drop their 3 or 4 player off the lineup to get a better matchup.

Seguso is a great matchup for UCLA at 5 against Barrick. Barrick likes to come in, serve and volley and Seguso has one of the best returns in college tennis. Matt Brooklyn at 3 is tough for anybody even if you have never seen him play. He was All Pac 10 and played 1 at ASU before they dropped their program and played 1 last year for UCLA. Inbar played 1 at Maryland before he transferred and was respectable 5-5 record against other 1's in ACC dual play.

UCLA should win, unless they pull a Srugo again
 
UCLA should win, unless they pull a Srugo again

Virginia should win, because they are the better team, although they played sub-par in doubles. It won't happen the same way in singles.

They will be worn out by the time they are done, however. That is worrisome, because Ohio State laid down and USC is resting.
 
LOL. UVa won it.. however; on 2 points before, two UVa guys charged court 6 to jump on their guy when they thought they won; then they realized UCLA had saved the match point. lol.
 
^^^Ha Ha!

I kept up with the UVA match today but couldn't tell much from the live stream. Seemed like they struggled in some places in singles, and obviously lost doubles. Not sure if it was the matchup with UCLA, but I think UVA is capable of being beaten. Of course, they pulled out a tough match and that will count for something.

Go Big Orange!
 
LOL. UVa won it.. however; on 2 points before, two UVa guys charged court 6 to jump on their guy when they thought they won; then they realized UCLA had saved the match point. lol.

Julen Uriguen hit a winner down the line and the UVa players charged the court. Tabatruong announced that he had called it out, and the umpire did not reverse the call, so it went to deuce.

I guess that is what you mean by "UCLA had saved the match point."
 
Julen Uriguen hit a winner down the line and the UVa players charged the court. Tabatruong announced that he had called it out, and the umpire did not reverse the call, so it went to deuce.

I guess that is what you mean by "UCLA had saved the match point."

This Uriguen fellow is a very talented player from what i have heard. He is supposed to be the future of Virginia tennis...
 
I think an osu just choke , maybe due to an extremely controlling coach who tells them what to do almost every point and they are so scared to lose. Just let them play Ty.
 
I think an osu just choke , maybe due to an extremely controlling coach who tells them what to do almost every point and they are so scared to lose. Just let them play Ty.

I know and Justin Kronage has not developed into a great player that he was suppose to develop into. I blame Ty for that.
 
I say Coach Whit has developed Klahn and Thacher into the top NCAA players in the country. and perhaps, one of the top Pros in the ATP,,,,,Time will tell..:)

Oh please......what about Bruch and Clayton and the lack of titles? On the other hand you are right, "only time will tell" if Klahn and Thacher will burn out like the other future Grand Slam champions. That said don't take my words to hard. I don't wish that on them and hope Clayton can find his way. Better luck next year Feddie.
 
I say Coach Whit has developed Klahn and Thacher into the top NCAA players in the country. and perhaps, one of the top Pros in the ATP,,,,,Time will tell..:)
... don't put them into your avatar or once again you may end up with more uninspired or injury-prone players like Clayton and Brush.:oops:
 
I was going to post something scathing, but my posts seem to have a way of being deleted as quickly as I post them. I don't want this thread to be removed.
 
Joey, I am just stating the facts ... in two years, two Fedace worship-type avatars followed by two promising college player's careers going down the tubes ....
 
Joey, I am just stating the facts ... in two years, two Fedace worship-type avatars followed by two promising college player's careers going down the tubes ....

I didn't mean you, TourTenor. I value your comments (and wholeheartedly agree with them).
 
I say Coach Whit has developed Klahn and Thacher into the top NCAA players in the country. and perhaps, one of the top Pros in the ATP,,,,,Time will tell..:)

Yes, they were virtual unknowns, and not highly recruited, when they arrived! Did nothing in juniors, but now they are suddenly good! :)
 
VIDEO? Live cam?

Just saw this and thought people here would be interested.

Men's Team Draw:
http://www.itatennis.com/Assets/ita...10+NCAA+Championships/2010_M_Team_Bracket.pdf

Women's Team Draw:
http://www.itatennis.com/Assets/ita...10+NCAA+Championships/2010_W_Team_Bracket.pdf

Most interesting (potential) matchup I saw in the men's draw -- if it plays out according to seeds -- is the quarterfinal between 4) Ohio State and 5) USC. I like SC in that one - but I'm a west coast/PAC-10 guy ;-)


K_I

Ugh! I can't find a Live-Cam? Is there a live-cam? If so, please post the link. Quick, I want to watch what's left of today's match.
 
USC advances to the finals 4-2 over UVA.

Early on it looked like VA was going to run singles 2 -> 5. Fortunately D. Nguyen took 1st set @ #4 into a long tiebreak (curious what actual score was - just saw he won last 2 points), and Johnson took 2nd set @ #2.

VA played a real tough match. I can see why they were highly ranked.
 
Quick question Clark, why did Singer not play in the team tourney? If he wasn't injured I think it's an awfully tough move to sit a senior who has been in the top 6 all year.
 
Quick question Clark, why did Singer not play in the team tourney? If he wasn't injured I think it's an awfully tough move to sit a senior who has been in the top 6 all year.

He had a hurt foot. Doubles does not have too much running, but playing singles as a baseliner with a hurt foot would be asking too much. He still did quite well in doubles at #3, but the top two teams kept losing close matches.
 
USC advances to the finals 4-2 over UVA.

Early on it looked like VA was going to run singles 2 -> 5. Fortunately D. Nguyen took 1st set @ #4 into a long tiebreak (curious what actual score was - just saw he won last 2 points), and Johnson took 2nd set @ #2.

VA played a real tough match. I can see why they were highly ranked.

I believe the tiebreaker score was 11-9 for Nguyen.

Houston Barrick won 10-8 in his second set tiebreak, and the tiebreaker to decide #1 singles went overtime as well, but don't know the score.
 
He had a hurt foot. Doubles does not have too much running, but playing singles as a baseliner with a hurt foot would be asking too much. He still did quite well in doubles at #3, but the top two teams kept losing close matches.

thanks. tough luck for the hoos. One of these days the chips will fall right for Boland and co.
 
I've asked former UVA players and they are still amazed they haven't won it yet. The best chance they had was 2008 where the line up was Somdev, Huey, Dom, Sanam, Shabaz, Teddy Angelinos. Sub in a great doubles player in Barrick for Teddy and that team is nasty.

On paper, that team is unbeatable but after talking to some people in college tennis, the difference was Flores coming back to UGA after taking the fall off to try the circuit.

UVA next year returns, Shabaz, Sanam, Jarmere (assuming he stays), Courtney (who I view as almost unbeatable at 3 or 4), Urigen. Another solid team that could win it all, depending on how they come back.
 
I've asked former UVA players and they are still amazed they haven't won it yet. The best chance they had was 2008 where the line up was Somdev, Huey, Dom, Sanam, Shabaz, Teddy Angelinos. Sub in a great doubles player in Barrick for Teddy and that team is nasty.

On paper, that team is unbeatable but after talking to some people in college tennis, the difference was Flores coming back to UGA after taking the fall off to try the circuit.

UVA next year returns, Shabaz, Sanam, Jarmere (assuming he stays), Courtney (who I view as almost unbeatable at 3 or 4), Urigen. Another solid team that could win it all, depending on how they come back.

I don't see Jarmere Jenkins turning pro. I also don't think there will be any big surprises a la Devin Britton around the country this year. I cannot see anyone turning pro early. The only possibility is a top international recruit who comes in at an advanced age and does not want to play college tennis until age 24 before trying the pro circuit.

The only player who fits that bill is Henrique Cunha of Duke (and Brazil), who is a 21 year old freshman. But I think he will play a second year. Honestly, UVa might need to be challenged again by Duke next year, because the ACC has been too much of a lull in between the ITA National Team Indoors and the NCAA tournament every year. We try to schedule Baylor. Texas, Notre Dame, and Illinois every year, but the latter two have fallen off a bit lately, and all four of these matches are well before the NCAAs each spring. The Illinois and Notre Dame matches are always early and indoors.

We are not being tested often enough outdoors in the heat prior to the NCAAs each year. The Pac-10 and SEC teams test each other pretty often throughout the season. The ACC had a stretch a couple of years ago where Florida State, Miami, and UNC were all really good, but the last couple of years have seen a lot of good but not great ACC teams. Typically, the second best ACC team is about the #16 seed.

Sometimes we UVa fans think it is great that UNC or Duke or FSU is graduating some great player, but that might be shortsighted on our part.
 
Cunha is not 21. He just turned 20. He is very likely to go pro as many pros think he isn't really tested in college but he tried the circuit for an year already and only got to mid 600s.

As for Jenkins, people are not worrying about him going pro. There are other factors with him.

Duke is going to be better next year. Arnould just never improved and virtually stayed the same from the time he was Les Petit As winner. Saba and Mengel are good players who are likely to crack the lineup somewhere. Duke would have been great this year also except admissions got in the way of two freshmen who are also top 50 players from entering Duke.

FSU is likely to drop off with Aubone and Vahid graduating. They had a pretty nasty top 4 for a while but could not really do a whole lot with it. Miami has dropped a lot and doesn't show much signs of getting better. UNC is interesting as they lose Donato and Crone. They have good talent but mentally, some of their players are extremely weak.

The problem with ACC being consistently good as that there really is no history with ACC Men's tennis. There have been some good team but no NCAA champions, not even a finalist. Virginia has been the only team semifinalists and even that has been recent.
 
I don't see Jarmere Jenkins turning pro. I also don't think there will be any big surprises a la Devin Britton around the country this year. I cannot see anyone turning pro early. The only possibility is a top international recruit who comes in at an advanced age and does not want to play college tennis until age 24 before trying the pro circuit.

The only player who fits that bill is Henrique Cunha of Duke (and Brazil), who is a 21 year old freshman. But I think he will play a second year. Honestly, UVa might need to be challenged again by Duke next year, because the ACC has been too much of a lull in between the ITA National Team Indoors and the NCAA tournament every year. We try to schedule Baylor. Texas, Notre Dame, and Illinois every year, but the latter two have fallen off a bit lately, and all four of these matches are well before the NCAAs each spring. The Illinois and Notre Dame matches are always early and indoors.

We are not being tested often enough outdoors in the heat prior to the NCAAs each year. The Pac-10 and SEC teams test each other pretty often throughout the season. The ACC had a stretch a couple of years ago where Florida State, Miami, and UNC were all really good, but the last couple of years have seen a lot of good but not great ACC teams. Typically, the second best ACC team is about the #16 seed.

Sometimes we UVa fans think it is great that UNC or Duke or FSU is graduating some great player, but that might be shortsighted on our part.

UT beats UGA 4-2 in the face of a hostile home crowd. They have to be a heavy favorite against USC tomorrow. They will have a home type crowd in Athens.

About the singles I have to disagree. If UT's Rhyne Williams wins the NCAA singlesor is runner-up it would not shock me if he went pro. He has won a Futures title or two while in high school. Also if Tennys Sandgren did not join the team mid-year he is another who if he has a successful summer could go pro as well.
 
UVA had just as good a shot as anybody in the final four to win it this year. USC was just better on this day. I didn't see today's match but I watched Sunday's singles vs UCLA in Athens. Sunday- Shabaz looked unbeatable, Singh was up and down, Jenkins could not finish off points at the net, and the #6 guy was in the zone in his third set and probably would have beat anyone on that day. Today Shabaz loses, Jenkins wins, and the #6 guy loses in straight sets.

Should be a good final tomorrow night.
 
Back
Top