N
Nathaniel_Near
Guest
Now what a BEAUTIFUL setup that was with that julienne slice of a backhand to seize control of the rally.
And now three BPs.
And now three BPs.
it's not so much the fact that he makes a ton of unforced errors. it's the way that he makes them. On easy slices, on easy forehand rally shots, on easy backhands. And he doesn't take his chances, doesn't take the initiative. Every half decent ball is followed by an appalling one...
That will be reality within a year
It'll reach Rafita too in a year or two, don't worry.
Just tuned in, someone tell me is it ********?
Just tuned in, someone tell me is it ********?
I never worry.
I am mentally strong like Rafael Nadal.
Rafael Nadal recently said he will still be playing in 2018.
Stunning, I guess that means we're the same person right?
I never worry.
I am mentally strong like Rafael Nadal.
Rafael Nadal recently said he will still be playing in 2018.
You-called-the-wrong-numberer.
Not exactly vintage.
Plenty of credit must go to Youzhny.
**
That forehand is operating quite consistently now to Y's BH side at least.
its actually failerer, but seems to be playing somewhat approaching decent tennis now .
Already reported you.:twisted:
livescorehunter.com
sportlemon.tv
http://www.sportlemon.tv/20130609/vv51b4de7da81fd6.42783516-593034.html
I never worry.
I am mentally strong like Rafael Nadal.
Rafael Nadal recently said he will still be playing in 2018.
Report all you want, mods can check it easily if its the same ip, I'm not worried as I know the truth.
Well not too worried now that it's one set all. And if Youzhny can only take a set of failerer in a TB then yeah I'm positive going into the decider.
I was joking.
First of all, Fed beat Nadal 10 times (his last win coming last year so not ancient history exactly) and second his BH was never the foundation of his game, it's his FH that is killing him today and this year overall.
I actually disagree. His backhand is the real liability. He's not the same player that he used to be, and his backhand simply needs to be better to compete against week-in and week-out. Seriously. Let's forget about the forehand for a moment. It's not that his backhand is a bad, per-say, because it's not bad at all. He's still an amazing shotmaker, and when things are going well, that particular shot has an enormous upside. However, in comparison to any of the top five, or even Youhzny or Warwinka or Haas, Federer's backhand is less consistent and reliable, which continues to be his undoing. Some players rely on that BH-BH pattern to control points, and Federer does not and never really has. But that's not the issue. The issue is staying on level terms, and not losing control of the point or falling behind in the rally. When Federer was moving better, it was less of an issue than it is now.
well, its mainly the federer serve that took it to the breaker.
he'll still probably win this, but needs to step it up big time for wimbledon ..
I actually disagree. His backhand is the real liability. He's not the same player that he used to be, and his backhand simply needs to be better to compete against week-in and week-out. Seriously. Let's forget about the forehand for a moment. It's not that his backhand is a bad, per-say, because it's not bad at all. He's still an amazing shotmaker, and when things are going well, that particular shot has an enormous upside. However, in comparison to any of the top five, or even Youhzny or Warwinka or Haas, Federer's backhand is less consistent and reliable, which continues to be his undoing. Some players rely on that BH-BH pattern to control points, and Federer does not and never really has. But that's not the issue. The issue is staying on level terms, and not losing control of the point or falling behind in the rally. When Federer was moving better, it was less of an issue than it is now.
I actually disagree. His backhand is the real liability. He's not the same player that he used to be, and his backhand simply needs to be better to compete against week-in and week-out. Seriously. Let's forget about the forehand for a moment. It's not that his backhand is a bad, per-say, because it's not bad at all. He's still an amazing shotmaker, and when things are going well, that particular shot has an enormous upside. However, in comparison to any of the top five, or even Youhzny or Warwinka or Haas, Federer's backhand is less consistent and reliable, which continues to be his undoing. Some players rely on that BH-BH pattern to control points, and Federer does not and never really has. But that's not the issue. The issue is staying on level terms, and not losing control of the point or falling behind in the rally. When Federer was moving better, it was less of an issue than it is now.
Other examples - one of the defining points in the Wimbledon semis which further turned the tide in Roger's favour mentally occurred in a very long rally where Fed eventually won the point by drawing an error with a beautifully struck backhand dtl, where he redirected the pace beautifully. The only reason he was able to win this point is because his weaker stroke just wouldn't break down.
Same occurred against Murray in the final.
For Roger to win Wimbledon his only choice and chance is to make sure that his weaker stroke can't be adequately attacked.
both forehand and backhand are problematic. He needs his forehand to be top-2 to be at the top of his game. He needs his backhand to be decent as well. Neither is the case at the moment.
The thing also is that they are both interdependent in the end, in and of each other.