2013 NCAA Men's Tennis Tournament - Champaign, IL

TopDawg

G.O.A.T.
Here is Mitchell's final service game of the match. He's over-ruled on MP #1 on a ball that was inside the line, then on MP #2 the fans start celebrating too soon as Puget frames one off the line, and finally on MP #3 Puget sprays one long.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
But aren't they losing their top guns where a few of the other top finishers have very young teams?

I thought the only lost Jenkins (which admittedly is no small loss), and they have great recruits. I have no idea if they can go on a streak of championships, just putting it out there.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
thank god UCLA didn't win Dennis novikov is compelte trash

he was fairly subdued today. He did question calls, but players from both teams were doing that, as well as protesting noise from the crowd, protesting second serve tosses which were caught, but which they thought the server touched.

There were some eye rolling moments which presented college tennis players as spoiled, entitled, and bit*y, but overall things were fairly good, knowing that things like shouting across courts and making a scene after winning a set is the norm.

Fans were pretty good. One UVA fan and a small group of UCLA fans were pretty obnoxious though, to the point of being classless (the UCLA fans more so). But, they were in the minority.
 
Last edited:

treeman10

Semi-Pro
I just don't think recruiting class typically means that much the first year there. Great freshman come in but rarely make a significant mark moving well into the lineup till at least soph year and beyond. It is boys coming in to play against men. They all think they are coming in to play #1 or top of lineup however, very few do unless they go into lower level team/school. Reality hits in the fall.
 

axel89

Banned
I just don't think recruiting class typically means that much the first year there. Great freshman come in but rarely make a significant mark moving well into the lineup till at least soph year and beyond. It is boys coming in to play against men. They all think they are coming in to play #1 or top of lineup however, very few do unless they go into lower level team/school. Reality hits in the fall.
great point the difference between the top hs players and college players are huge. On another note what's happening on the women's side of draw?
 

treeman10

Semi-Pro
UCLA should be better next season with the addition of Brymer and MacDonald. And lose none of the top 6 unless Novikov goes pro.

Ya, unless Novikov leaves, I just don't see where those guys are going to play. You can win all you want in juniors, doesn't mean much coiming into lineup as freshman for top 5 teams (or not that often). Again, it's the boys joining the men thing. Don't see them doing much till second or third year in.
 

TopDawg

G.O.A.T.
Not that it matters but it was interesting that on the all NCAA Tournament Team the National Champs only had 1 entry in singles.

#1: Blaz Rola
#2: Marcos Giron
#3: Mitchell Frank
#4: Devin McCarthy
#5: Garrett Brasseaux
#6: Karue Sell

They did have 2 on the doubles with Jenkins/Styslinger at 1 and Shane/Uriguen at 3.
 

Automator

Semi-Pro
I just don't think recruiting class typically means that much the first year there. Great freshman come in but rarely make a significant mark moving well into the lineup till at least soph year and beyond. It is boys coming in to play against men. They all think they are coming in to play #1 or top of lineup however, very few do unless they go into lower level team/school. Reality hits in the fall.

What sport are you watching? Both Domijan and Frank won the All-American and were ranked #1 in their freshman years. Alex Clayton's best year at Stanford was his first. The #5 seed in the singles tournament is a freshman.
 
Ya, unless Novikov leaves, I just don't see where those guys are going to play. You can win all you want in juniors, doesn't mean much coiming into lineup as freshman for top 5 teams (or not that often). Again, it's the boys joining the men thing. Don't see them doing much till second or third year in.

Depends on the player. But some players are actually better early in their careers. From what I have seen of Brymer(absurdly good footwork to set up aggressive shots) he should be a factor immediately. Who will fall out of the UCLA top 6? Who knows but it will be a battle.
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
I just don't think recruiting class typically means that much the first year there. Great freshman come in but rarely make a significant mark moving well into the lineup till at least soph year and beyond. It is boys coming in to play against men. They all think they are coming in to play #1 or top of lineup however, very few do unless they go into lower level team/school. Reality hits in the fall.

When was the last time UVa did NOT have a freshman in the top 6? How about USC? I guess Karue Sell was a redshirt freshman this year (came in last spring but did not play, maybe not eligible yet). De Vroome was top 6 for USC when healthy. Robbie Bellamy, who is below the top UCLA and UVa recruits, has a good shot at the top 6 at USC next spring with Gomez turning pro. With Novikov supposedly turning pro, and Maxime Tabatruong (#7) and Alex Brigham (#8 ) graduating, there is not much question that UCLA will have a freshman in the top 6. I would bet that Thai Kwiatkowski will be top 5 for UVa next year, probably top 4.
 

Nostradamus

Bionic Poster
Does John Morrissey have decent chance of upsetting this guy in the 1st round ? He is playing some guys named Anthony Rossi from Kentucky. he is seeded player
 

treeman10

Semi-Pro
When was the last time UVa did NOT have a freshman in the top 6? How about USC? I guess Karue Sell was a redshirt freshman this year (came in last spring but did not play, maybe not eligible yet). De Vroome was top 6 for USC when healthy. Robbie Bellamy, who is below the top UCLA and UVa recruits, has a good shot at the top 6 at USC next spring with Gomez turning pro. With Novikov supposedly turning pro, and Maxime Tabatruong (#7) and Alex Brigham (#8 ) graduating, there is not much question that UCLA will have a freshman in the top 6. I would bet that Thai Kwiatkowski will be top 5 for UVa next year, probably top 4.

Different conversation. Sure they can come in but we were talking having a huge impact to the team their first year. Whether you swap Brymer for Sell isn't gonna make a huge difference. There aren't that many Mitchell Frank's was the point.
 

Tennis mom

New User
I will ignore the poster that said I posted this cause I don't like him.... it is just what I was told at beginning of NCAAs and thought was common knowledge by now, but surprised it hasn't come up anywhere yet.

You don't have to have socal in your id to know a lot about the ins and outs of that team. There is crazy stuff, but this is just him going pro, don't think that is a scandal.

Turning a Pro is a business decision. And Novikov is not a Carribien Sunset to be liked by everyone. Sorry he is not your favorite. Just get over it.

It is nobody's business what he is doing next.
 

treeman10

Semi-Pro
Get over what? Love your spelling btw, they have spell checker online now. lol. And college sunset wasn't an insult, it was a way to say he was leaving college tennis. Pissy that they lost maybe? He built the reputation he has and ironically nothing I said in these posts was negative about him. But thanks for reminding us about the views about him out there....have a great day! :)
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
Different conversation. Sure they can come in but we were talking having a huge impact to the team their first year. Whether you swap Brymer for Sell isn't gonna make a huge difference. There aren't that many Mitchell Frank's was the point.

If UCLA's recruits only compete for #6, that is fine with me. But Styslinger and Ryan Shane competed at #4 and #5 all year, which means they helped us be better at three positions, and they were not considered to be in the league of Domijan and Frank as recruits. Justin Shane was a low blue chip and played #5. De Vroome played #5 for USC this year until injured. Wagland played #2 for Georgia until KU Singh left and he moved up to #1. Libietis played #1 for Tennessee a year ago as a freshman. Giron was #4 for UCLA as a freshman a year ago. Sarmiento was #4 for a national champion USC two years ago as a freshman. Lots of recruits, every year, play above #6 for teams ranked in the top 5. Do they have to play #3 or higher before they matter?
 

B1G Tennis

New User
I'm pretty sad that I missed this match today. It looks incredibly close and random. Heck, one can make decent argument that six of the seven points went to the underdog (with the only exception apparently being decided by a call on match point). There isn't much more you can ask for beyond that. The tourney got off to a slow start, but the last two rounds were fantastic.
 
UCLA got screwed on that call. Cheap call. Shame UVA's first title is slightly tainted.

If you're referring to the foot hitting the net, it sounds by all acounts, even the UCLA coach's, that it was an obvious call.

The thing that cracked me up, and thank you TopDawg for all your excellent coverage, was the call that Frank made on his first match point. An essential moonball that clearly landed inside the line (on the side where all the fans were), and he calls it out. Just goes to show you how often these guys see what they want to see so often.
 

B1G Tennis

New User
When was the last time UVa did NOT have a freshman in the top 6? How about USC? I guess Karue Sell was a redshirt freshman this year (came in last spring but did not play, maybe not eligible yet). De Vroome was top 6 for USC when healthy. Robbie Bellamy, who is below the top UCLA and UVa recruits, has a good shot at the top 6 at USC next spring with Gomez turning pro. With Novikov supposedly turning pro, and Maxime Tabatruong (#7) and Alex Brigham (#8 ) graduating, there is not much question that UCLA will have a freshman in the top 6. I would bet that Thai Kwiatkowski will be top 5 for UVa next year, probably top 4.

Yeah, Kwiatkowski is an internationally accomplished junior who gave Novikov a tough battle at Kalamazoo last year. I think he'll probably be your #4 next year, with Corinteli having a great chance to play #5 or 6.

Farren hasn't played junior tournaments recently, but based on past results and his futures scores, he'll probably start at 4 for the Trojans, and Bellamy will be competing for a starting spot.

At UCLA, all three recruits (McDonald, Brymer, and DiGiulio) have a chance at starting. Throw in a potential top 15 national player and likely #1 at Texas (Goldhoff) and a likely tourney qualifier and #1 at UNC (Schnieder) and I think next year sets up to be a great class for freshmen. And that isn't even consider the international recruits.
 

Vicious Vik

Semi-Pro
If you're referring to the foot hitting the net, it sounds by all acounts, even the UCLA coach's, that it was an obvious call.

The thing that cracked me up, and thank you TopDawg for all your excellent coverage, was the call that Frank made on his first match point. An essential moonball that clearly landed inside the line (on the side where all the fans were), and he calls it out. Just goes to show you how often these guys see what they want to see so often.

see when it's Virginia who makes that call it's "see what he wants to see" but if a UCLA player had made that call then it would be "classless cheater".

Just an interesting thought.
 

Automator

Semi-Pro
Players aren't the only ones who see what they want to see. Go follow football recruiting if you want to seem some spectacular double standards from fans.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
I was there. It was very unfortunate, very freakish, but Puget touched the net. it was called immediately. No one was upset by the call. Puget didn't protest, the UCLA coach didn't protest. The fans gasped, not because they thought it was the wrong call, but because it was so dramatic to have something like that happen on match point. Yeah, it sucks. UCLA was good enough to win, but didn't. That happens.
 
see when it's Virginia who makes that call it's "see what he wants to see" but if a UCLA player had made that call then it would be "classless cheater".

Just an interesting thought.

Not really. Die hard UCLA fans would call any UVA player or any player from any other team a classless cheater if a bad call is made.

Same for UVA fans for players on opposing teams. That's just the way fans are.

I've been a big Brian Boland fan for a lot of years for the way he has run that program, and I've read the Sabre for at least five years, and really appreciate all the loyalty and support that their fans show.

That being said, a high percentage of regular Sabre posters believe that UVA players have never made a bad call, and that opposing players just know how to play the system better than their beloved Hoos.

Like I said, that's just fans being fans.
 

Kirijax

Hall of Fame
But that's what makes being a fan so much fun and so miserable all at the same time sometimes. Gotta take the bad with the occasional great.
 
Karue Sell had a great week. He took out most of the dominant no. 6's this year including Uriguen and Tahir. Will be interesting to see where he plays in the lineup next year.
 

mikej

Hall of Fame
Congrats UVA fans - glad the west coast folks won't be able to use their stupid reply "this is outdoors where UVA always chokes lol - they won't win" in response to any comment about UVA being NCAA title favorites anymore

The best team won - even if they weren't playing the best tennis for much of the finals - Jenkins came up with the biggest win of his career in his final match, taking down a hot Novikov - and frank justified every coach who has always pleaded "fight to the end and get one more ball back - you never know what'll happen"

I was also very impressed with boland during the final games standing back, not getting involved in arguments or even much coaching, and trusting the man that he had recruited and helped grow up for a few years to get it done - that side of the screen coaches hug while all the players mobbed frank was awesome - well done boland
 

mikej

Hall of Fame
Oh and as always thanks for the coverage and vids topdawg - anyone else catch the UCLA assistant coach making his first step towards rushing court when that match pt volley was on its way? - that freakin close - wild stuff
 
Top