But aren't they losing their top guns where a few of the other top finishers have very young teams?
But aren't they losing their top guns where a few of the other top finishers have very young teams?
But aren't they losing their top guns where a few of the other top finishers have very young teams?
I thought the only lost Jenkins (which admittedly is no small loss), and they have great recruits. I have no idea if they can go on a streak of championships, just putting it out there.
my bad, thought Alex Domijan was a senior.
thank god UCLA didn't win Dennis novikov is compelte trash
Will the annoying cheering and screaming be less for the individual tournament?
UVA loses Jenkins and Uriguen. They add the #1 recruiting class (although it's #1 by a nose over UCLA's class).
great point the difference between the top hs players and college players are huge. On another note what's happening on the women's side of draw?I just don't think recruiting class typically means that much the first year there. Great freshman come in but rarely make a significant mark moving well into the lineup till at least soph year and beyond. It is boys coming in to play against men. They all think they are coming in to play #1 or top of lineup however, very few do unless they go into lower level team/school. Reality hits in the fall.
UCLA should be better next season with the addition of Brymer and MacDonald. And lose none of the top 6 unless Novikov goes pro.
I just don't think recruiting class typically means that much the first year there. Great freshman come in but rarely make a significant mark moving well into the lineup till at least soph year and beyond. It is boys coming in to play against men. They all think they are coming in to play #1 or top of lineup however, very few do unless they go into lower level team/school. Reality hits in the fall.
Ya, unless Novikov leaves, I just don't see where those guys are going to play. You can win all you want in juniors, doesn't mean much coiming into lineup as freshman for top 5 teams (or not that often). Again, it's the boys joining the men thing. Don't see them doing much till second or third year in.
I just don't think recruiting class typically means that much the first year there. Great freshman come in but rarely make a significant mark moving well into the lineup till at least soph year and beyond. It is boys coming in to play against men. They all think they are coming in to play #1 or top of lineup however, very few do unless they go into lower level team/school. Reality hits in the fall.
When was the last time UVa did NOT have a freshman in the top 6? How about USC? I guess Karue Sell was a redshirt freshman this year (came in last spring but did not play, maybe not eligible yet). De Vroome was top 6 for USC when healthy. Robbie Bellamy, who is below the top UCLA and UVa recruits, has a good shot at the top 6 at USC next spring with Gomez turning pro. With Novikov supposedly turning pro, and Maxime Tabatruong (#7) and Alex Brigham (#8 ) graduating, there is not much question that UCLA will have a freshman in the top 6. I would bet that Thai Kwiatkowski will be top 5 for UVa next year, probably top 4.
I will ignore the poster that said I posted this cause I don't like him.... it is just what I was told at beginning of NCAAs and thought was common knowledge by now, but surprised it hasn't come up anywhere yet.
You don't have to have socal in your id to know a lot about the ins and outs of that team. There is crazy stuff, but this is just him going pro, don't think that is a scandal.
Different conversation. Sure they can come in but we were talking having a huge impact to the team their first year. Whether you swap Brymer for Sell isn't gonna make a huge difference. There aren't that many Mitchell Frank's was the point.
UCLA got screwed on that call. Cheap call. Shame UVA's first title is slightly tainted.
It's a shame we all won't get the seconds back in our lives from reading your idiotic posts.
excuse me?
UCLA got screwed on that call. Cheap call. Shame UVA's first title is slightly tainted.
UCLA will lose one of their top two because they're turning pro but Romain Bogaerts of MIss St is going to transfer there.
When was the last time UVa did NOT have a freshman in the top 6? How about USC? I guess Karue Sell was a redshirt freshman this year (came in last spring but did not play, maybe not eligible yet). De Vroome was top 6 for USC when healthy. Robbie Bellamy, who is below the top UCLA and UVa recruits, has a good shot at the top 6 at USC next spring with Gomez turning pro. With Novikov supposedly turning pro, and Maxime Tabatruong (#7) and Alex Brigham (#8 ) graduating, there is not much question that UCLA will have a freshman in the top 6. I would bet that Thai Kwiatkowski will be top 5 for UVa next year, probably top 4.
If you're referring to the foot hitting the net, it sounds by all acounts, even the UCLA coach's, that it was an obvious call.
The thing that cracked me up, and thank you TopDawg for all your excellent coverage, was the call that Frank made on his first match point. An essential moonball that clearly landed inside the line (on the side where all the fans were), and he calls it out. Just goes to show you how often these guys see what they want to see so often.
see when it's Virginia who makes that call it's "see what he wants to see" but if a UCLA player had made that call then it would be "classless cheater".
Just an interesting thought.
Virginia didn't even make the call. LOLsee when it's Virginia who makes that call it's "see what he wants to see" but if a UCLA player had made that call then it would be "classless cheater".
Just an interesting thought.
UCLA will lose one of their top two because they're turning pro but Romain Bogaerts of MIss St is going to transfer there.
Is there any truth to this?
Does John Morrissey have decent chance of upsetting this guy in the 1st round ? He is playing some guys named Anthony Rossi from Kentucky. he is seeded player
UCLA will lose one of their top two because they're turning pro