Well... The Blade 98S produced the most arch/the highest trajectory for me. This translated into hitting deep balls with a high arch and somewhat of a difficulty to combine depth with a flatter trajectory. If I really swung at it while making lighter contact I could find acute angles that were quite amazing, but the ball tended to be loaded with spin and rather very floaty. Mid court balls were set up shots for my opponent, because the spin component was too large relative to the speed component and the ball jumped into the strike zone. Overall I would not recommend lead in the hoop as I did, for the racquet is plenty lively already. Significant amounts of weight in handle/buttcap may be able to counter the problem somewhat, but I generally recommend this racquet to guys who really like to rip topspin groundstrokes and need some help in the power/depth department (probably guys with extreme grips).
The 6.1 95S is more controllable. The launch angle is reminiscent of the Blade, but it is less extreme and more suited to traditional strokes. The feel still is quite lively and jumpy though, which isn't the best when you want to pin-point a shot into a target. I was more versatile with this stick in regards to trajectory and depth, but I found myself playing through the middle an awful lot, because I had difficulties gauging just how deep the ball would go. I once again struggled to find the balance between depth, topspin, pace, and trajectory essentially. This racquet is more accessible to a wider crowd IMO, but those who still want to have that spin pattern's lively feel on contact.
The PS 97S is far and away the most controllable racquet of the bunch IMO. The launch angle is lower and the spin levels are lower relative to the pace produced, but it is this which makes the racquet more suited to people used to traditional string patterns IMO. When making lighter contact on topspin strokes you really get a lot of spin, but the ball isn't quite as floaty (the launch angle is lower and more predictable, so there is more court penetration). Flatter shots are easier to play as well, and I personally find it rather easy to vary my shot trajectory from a few inches over the net, to several feet over the net. Granted, the jump after the bounce isn't quite as extreme, but therefore I can readily vary my shots' nature and set up or finish off a point to my liking. This racquet also is more forgiving in regards to the contact point, as I find the more exaggerated string patterns to really punish late contact with the ball.
If there's anything I've forgotten to mention, let me know
)
