K
King Fed WW
Guest
Stories of Nadal's demise are greatly exaggerated
There has been some sort of recent trend, led by MichaelNadal, to suggest that Nadal is completely done, has declined hugely and has no chance at RG.
Yes there has been a decline. But that doesn't mean the end,certainly not of winning the French. Federer declined years ago and still nearly won Wimbledon aged 33 and 11 months.
Yes he isn't as good and that is why he loses to Wawrinka in a night session in Rome, he would have won that match any year up to 2013. He now needs things, like conditions to be in his favour, previously he didn't. But still, he wins that match if it takes place during the warm day.
But the conditions at RG are perfect for him and if it is sunny Nole will have to play his best to beat him.
Do you really expect anyone else to get 3 sets? They can, but how likely is it really? He is the DESERVED 2ND FAVOURITE, but sill low odds. It would be a pretty weird sport if the 2nd favourite couldn't win...
There has been some sort of recent trend, led by MichaelNadal, to suggest that Nadal is completely done, has declined hugely and has no chance at RG.
Yes there has been a decline. But that doesn't mean the end,certainly not of winning the French. Federer declined years ago and still nearly won Wimbledon aged 33 and 11 months.
Yes he isn't as good and that is why he loses to Wawrinka in a night session in Rome, he would have won that match any year up to 2013. He now needs things, like conditions to be in his favour, previously he didn't. But still, he wins that match if it takes place during the warm day.
But the conditions at RG are perfect for him and if it is sunny Nole will have to play his best to beat him.
Do you really expect anyone else to get 3 sets? They can, but how likely is it really? He is the DESERVED 2ND FAVOURITE, but sill low odds. It would be a pretty weird sport if the 2nd favourite couldn't win...
Last edited by a moderator: