Yeah, Djokovic solidified his claim to GOAT returner.
Fed could have/should have attacked more; may not have mattered. Also should have hit the short slice to force Djokovic to come to net - AND force him to volley - still not that good.
But great job with 3rd W and 9th overall.
I think Roger will strike back in Canada.
That was one of the most depressing Wimbledon finals I have ever seen.
Do you think Fed has another great run in him for a chance to grab #18 (not at Wimbledon necessarilly, maybe USO)?
Do you think Fed has another great run in him for a chance to grab #18 (not at Wimbledon necessarilly, maybe USO)?
It's always depressing to see a great champion not able to summon his powers due to aging.
Yeah, even though I was rooting for Novak against Rafa at FO, I still felt bad seeing him get crushed out there - shadow of his former self.
Yeah he better do something soonNot that Roger was "a shell of his former self" today like Nadal in that QF a month ago, but he's getting close to that tipping point.
Yeah, Djokovic solidified his claim to GOAT returner.
Fed could have/should have attacked more; may not have mattered. Also should have hit the short slice to force Djokovic to come to net - AND force him to volley - still not that good.
But great job with 3rd W and 9th overall.
I think his best chance after Wimbledon is the USO, but his chances of winning another major will go down exponentially if he doesn't do it really damn soon.
"Pomperer"? "Twilighterer"? Hahaha, you absolutely crack me up Nathaniel!!Folks can argue Nadal and that's fine, but I just don't see it, even with him achieving against Pomperer rather than Twilighterer. What I saw from Djokovic when it really matters in the last two Wimbledons is a game that's ridiculously difficult to consistently exploit.
I think Nadal is done winning Wimbledon titles but I could see Djokovic bagging #4. And I think his game is sustainable on grass for a longer grass prime window than Nadal's.
It's hilarious how many fed lovers were actually thinking fed had a chance of winning the final. I will give him credit for making it and taking out Murray. But please this match was a joke, there was no way in hell old man fed was going to take 3 sets off joker. He was lucky that that joker pulled one of his choke jobs in the 2nd otherwise it was a routine straight set win.
I will give fed credit for still playing good at his age but he has no chance of taking 3 sets in a major against joker. It does show with rafa fading and Murray a head case there is not much competition for joker. He is getting off easy. I am sorry but these titles off old man fed don't mean much. Where was he when fed was in his prime? I can only remember him taking fed out at AO years back when fed was playing at his peak level.
Come on now this is silly - of course he had a chance.
You are the one that is being silly, his only chance was if joker got hurt. If not for joker crapping down his leg in the 2nd set this was a routine straight set win.
IF IF IF….blah blah blah. How many if's do you want to play?
So you think a player who has set points in the first set, winning a tie-break doesn't stand a chance? Hmm ok…I wouldn't like to have your lack of belief in a match, I'd lose straight away
Joker had at least 6 set points in the tiebreak and blew it. I don't need any ifs because this match was never in doubt. No way old man fed had any chance of winning this other than joker getting injured. We have seen this movie before and I already knew what the ending would be.
It's hilarious how many fed lovers were actually thinking fed had a chance of winning the final. I will give him credit for making it and taking out Murray. But please this match was a joke, there was no way in hell old man fed was going to take 3 sets off joker. He was lucky that that joker pulled one of his choke jobs in the 2nd otherwise it was a routine straight set win.
With hindsight, the result of the match is always an absolute certainty. But Federer was only a 35/65 underdog, none of that 0/100 nonsense. The first two sets could have gone either way; both players lost multiple set point opportunities, but you only give credit to Djokovic's opportunities. We could just as easily say that if not for Federer crapping his pants in the first, he would have been up two sets to love. Djokovic has been known to have mental letdowns when he is the favorite in slams; it is nothing new.
I picked Djoko in 4, but it was always going to be a tight match decided by a couple big points per set.
Most people don't watch the same movie twice when they know the ending - you're in the minority. Millions of people watched that final because they had no idea who would win. Maybe you can tell me what the lottery numbers this week will be?
I didn't waste my time watching this entire match just checked it out off and on. Once joker went up in the 3rd set I knew it was over. Then I turned it back on at the end of the fourth set to see the same old same old.
If you want to be taken at least half-seriously with your puerile comments then at least back it up by watching the whole match! Lol, too funny
I never tire of hearing you say that Hitman!Can I say it?
The reigning...defending...undisputed...heavyweight...ATP mens singles number one player of the world...Novak...Djokovic!![]()
I can only remember him taking fed out at AO years back when fed was playing at his peak level.
Federer is the GOAT. Ok I said it now do not let that go to your head @Nathaniel_Near.![]()
I think his best chance after Wimbledon is the USO, but his chances of winning another major will go down exponentially if he doesn't do it really damn soon.
I agree with tlm to a degree, my impression is that Novak was outplaying Fed for the large portion of the match while Fed was scrambling and struggling to hold on. He gutted out one set but that's about it, Novak was putting tremendous pressure on him from the baseline and on the return.
Of course the key was the 1st and that is somewhat on Fed but after that I didn't really feel like Fed was the better player throughout the rest of the match.
Hmm I don't really consider Fed GOAT. I just have a list of players at the top really... which Nole will be added to in a couple of years.
"Pomperer"? "Twilighterer"? Hahaha, you absolutely crack me up Nathaniel!!![]()
Anyone think sampras would have blown this match in key situations like this? The 3rd set just drives me crazy.
By now, Djoko's prevented Fed from at least as many slams as he's prevented Rafa from. Probably 1-2 more. I'd say, beers are on Djoko.Even if Djokovic, Murray and Nadal are not in the draw, it's no sure bet that Federer can win. Remember when Cilic blew him off the court at US Open last year? Plus as long as Federer is making $50 million per year, it's unlikely he'll be leaving tennis anytime soon. One thing Federer can be thankful for is that, despite his heartbreaking losses to Djokovic, it was Djokovic that basically saved Federer's Grand Slam record. Nadal would probably have surpassed Federer in the Slam count by now. Federer can be bitter but should probably buy Djokovic a beer at the same time. LOL!
It's hilarious how many fed lovers were actually thinking fed had a chance of winning the final. I will give him credit for making it and taking out Murray. But please this match was a joke, there was no way in hell old man fed was going to take 3 sets off joker. He was lucky that that joker pulled one of his choke jobs in the 2nd otherwise it was a routine straight set win.
I will give fed credit for still playing good at his age but he has no chance of taking 3 sets in a major against joker. It does show with rafa fading and Murray a head case there is not much competition for joker. He is getting off easy. I am sorry but these titles off old man fed don't mean much. Where was he when fed was in his prime? I can only remember him taking fed out at AO years back when fed was playing at his peak level.
Enjoy going off the grit.I figure this is as good as place as any to say this now:
I might not be around much the next month or so. This run from when the clay season starts to when Wimbledon ends is the peak of the season for me. When no real big tournaments are playing I don't post as much. I also find slams pretty long these days. I'm actually kind of starting to prefer the tennis that gets played in the masters events even though the prestige is nowhere near as high as in slams.
That said, congrats again to Novak. See you all again for the Rogers Cup. Might drop in sporadically in between.
I'm not so sure about that. Guess how old Djokovic is now 28? That puts him at 29 for the next French Open and Wimbledon. As we've seen from all of the recent greats, the initial decline is fast and furious. It takes these guys awhile to come to grips with their new physical limitations and then come back for a resurgence.
Every year, no supplements and innovations in the health and fitness world are coming out to improve performance. By supplements, I don't mean PEDs, but things that allow you to recover faster, have more endurance (naturally), and even get stronger. Plus, I feel fans overestimate how much Djokovic relies on speed (a fast depreciating asset) vs. flexibility (a slow depreciating asset). A few years ago, he chased after and got to most balls. Nowadays, he wisely conserves energy on balls that are iffy to get into play, let alone to win, and saves his energy for better balls.
I truly think Federer might steal one next year if Djokovic's light starts to fade even a little bit. I think Federer has plateaued in some ways, but he seems to keep adding different facets to his game as he ages. He could easily do it if Djokovic starts any kind of a decline. Keep in mind that outside of Nadal... Djokovic plays the most physical style of game out there. His decline isn't going to be gentle, either.
Has Djokovic not slowly evolved as well? Over the past few years, has he not increased his willingness to go to the net? I love how you know when and how his decline is going to occur. What are the lottery numbers next week?
Who would stop Federer if Djokovic lost a step? Murray? Berdych? Wawrinka? No way, we all know the answer to that.
What happens if Federer loses a step? At that point, all those names you listed off are irrelevant. The question will be how will Federer stop guys like Kevin Andersen, David Goffin, and others outside the top 10.
Outside of Djokovic, the only guy who potentially could beat Federer would be someone like Isner. Because of Davis Cup and some of his Masters finishes, Isner has proven that he can put together two or three excellent sets of serving. Outside of that possibility, I don't see anyone else having a chance.