2016 AO QF - Andy Murray vs David Ferrer

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    65
  • Poll closed .

RS92

Hall of Fame
WQGkss8.jpg




Last 5 matches:


CJzyJ7n.jpg
 
Last edited:
This has turned out to be another Wimbledon 2013 for Murray. Last thing we need now is someone engaging Djokovic in another five setter.
 
This has turned out to be another Wimbledon 2013 for Murray. Last thing we need now is someone engaging Djokovic in another five setter.

What if he plays 5 sets for the 2nd consecutive match vs Nishikori but he wins the semifinal in 4 for example?

Should that count?
 
Murray in whatever it takes. Ferrer has already lost the match mentally.

Most likely true. Whilst Murray doesn't quite have the same mental effect that the big 3 have on other players, they have almost just as little chance of beating him partly due to mental weakness.
 
What if he plays 5 sets for the 2nd consecutive match vs Nishikori but he wins the semifinal in 4 for example?

Should that count?

Why not?

"A cakewalk draw followed by semi dead opponent in Final who engaged two five setters in route."

Next case please. ;)
 
Why not?

"A cakewalk draw followed by semi dead opponent in Final who engaged two five setters in route."

Next case please. ;)

In 2012 he played 5 hours vs Murray in the AO semis and 2 days later he played 6 hours against Nadal and won too.

But in Wimbledon 2013 the Del Potro match was just "too much" for him and he wasn't a 100 % fit for the final according to everyone here.

What changed there? Is not like in 2013 he wasn't fit or something like that.

No doubt he was tired in the final, but is Djokovic...
 
In 2012 he played 5 hours vs Murray in the AO semis and 2 days later he played 6 hours against Nadal and won too.

But in Wimbledon 2013 the Del Potro match was just "too much" for him and he wasn't a 100 % fit for the final according to everyone here.

What changed there? Is not like in 2013 he wasn't fit or something like that.

No doubt he was tired in the final, but is Djokovic...

Oh… Not that again Sosa.
 
Have a feeling Ferrer is going to wreck Murray's energy and chances in the tournament with an exhausting average 20 shot per rally 4 or 5 setter.
That's the usual pattern anyway.
 
Oh… Not that again Sosa.

Why not? How many times the guy won his next match after playing a 4-5-6 hour match 2 days before?

Really, only with Murray in Wimbledon was he that exhausted that he didn't even win a set in the final?... It can't be just because of that.
 
Djokovic has never won a set against Murray on grass. No tiredness excuses for Djokovic at the Olympics.
Don't I remember Federer taking Murray to a draining 5 setter in an AO semi a few years back before Murray's final with Djokovic.
The tiredness excuse works both ways.
 
Should Murray pack it in and go home now?
See article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tough-scores-relieving-win-Bernard-Tomic.html
He won't get away with a distracted performance against the likes of Ferrer and whoever he meets after.
Mind has to be totally focused on tennis.
You can't blame him if his mind's really wandering though.
Feathers are one thing but the father of your heavily pregnant wife collapsing and in serious health must be really difficult to put out of your mind.
Or can he use that to inspire and spur him on. Win a slam for the family and his soon to be born child.
If my dad came home for me just to see me a few days earlier as a new born instead of having a good chance to win a slam I would be seriously annoyed when I was old enough to know.
Hey my dad saw me two days earlier as a new born. Or hey my dad won one of the greatest tournaments in tennis.
No brainer from the child's point of view. Think of the child Andy.
 
Ferrer's form has been fantastic this tournament.

I'd be surprised if this doesn't go to 4 or 5 sets.

But for the sake of tennis, although I like Ferrer, Andy should win.
 
Ferrer looks like he has taken some sort of potion.

Heart says Ferrer, brain say's Murray in 4.
Murray has beaten Ferrer at the FO of all places.

If Ferrer can't even handle Murray on clay, he doesn't stand a chance on a HC.

Murray in 4. He has to be at his 2014 level to lose this, which he isn't.
 
Murray in 3 because Ferrer tightens up at the business end of sets against the top 4 like clockwork. They'll all be close, but either Murray will find a way to win them or Ferrer will find a way to lose them.
 
In 2012 he played 5 hours vs Murray in the AO semis and 2 days later he played 6 hours against Nadal and won too.

But in Wimbledon 2013 the Del Potro match was just "too much" for him and he wasn't a 100 % fit for the final according to everyone here.

What changed there? Is not like in 2013 he wasn't fit or something like that.

No doubt he was tired in the final, but is Djokovic...

Lol..those are just the sort of excuses people who don't rate Murray like to trot out when he wins big against any of them. They have never been quite able to explain why the fittest player on tour could easily cope with a 6 hour final against Nadal after a 5 hour semi against Murray but apparently wasn't fit enough to cope with a much shorter Murray final following a 4 hour semi with Del Potro! Is it that Murray tires you out less than Del Potro does? ;)
 
Lol..those are just the sort of excuses people who don't rate Murray like to trot out when he wins big against any of them. They have never been quite able to explain why the fittest player on tour could easily cope with a 6 hour final against Nadal after a 5 hour semi against Murray but apparently wasn't fit enough to cope with a much shorter Murray final following a 4 hour semi with Del Potro! Is it that Murray tires you out less than Del Potro does? ;)


Murray only ever wins due to some extraneous factor, but every loss is 100% on him and him alone. Eni fule no thys.
 
Murray only ever wins due to some extraneous factor, but every loss is 100% on him and him alone. Eni fule no thys.

Well, I remember how most of the people here said that Murray won against Berdych in the USO 12 semis because of the wind, and that in the AO 2015 he was going to get destroyed by the power of Berdych because the wind wasn't going to be there to help him.

He didn't need the wind to win 6-0 the 2nd set and then the match :rolleyes:
 
Well, I remember how most of the people here said that Murray won against Berdych in the USO 12 semis because of the wind, and that in the AO 2015 he was going to get destroyed by the power of Berdych because the wind wasn't going to be there to help him.

He didn't need the wind to win 6-0 the 2nd set and then the match :rolleyes:

Meh. Enough with the logic and reason and stuff - you Murray fans are all the same!
 
Ferrer in 5.
He has been playing like a 22 yo, with style.
Murray is not fully mentally committed in this tournament. It would be a shame if he just takes a paternal leave from a semi or the final. Might as well stop here.
 
Ferrer in 5.
He has been playing like a 22 yo, with style.
Murray is not fully mentally committed in this tournament. It would be a shame if he just takes a paternal leave from a semi or the final. Might as well stop here.

The main concern for me as a Murray fan...
 
In 2012 he played 5 hours vs Murray in the AO semis and 2 days later he played 6 hours against Nadal and won too.

But in Wimbledon 2013 the Del Potro match was just "too much" for him and he wasn't a 100 % fit for the final according to everyone here.

What changed there? Is not like in 2013 he wasn't fit or something like that.

No doubt he was tired in the final, but is Djokovic...
I know it might sound strange, but Chris Evert (seven time French Open champion) once said that a long match on grass was more tougher on her physically than a long match on clay, because of all the bending and it exhausts the back and the knees a lot more than any other surface.
 
I know it might sound strange, but Chris Evert (seven time French Open champion) once said that a long match on grass was more tougher on her physically than a long match on clay, because of all the bending and it exhausts the back and the knees a lot more than any other surface.

Much tougher than a long match in a hard court too?
 
Murray owns Ferrer on hard courts, so I expect him to win in four sets. It could be an interesting match, since Ferrer has yet to lose a set and he's been playing consistently well, including that great win against Isner.
 
Much tougher than a long match in a hard court too?
She wasn't talking about HC, but the point is that the amount of energy that playing on grass drains from the player is underrated, only because the surface is fast.
 
I agree with many that Murray should straight him. But I think he'll go a little off the boil (one of the Fiery One, Fred Stolle's favorites) in the 3rd and Ferrer will steal it. Then Murray will snap his neck in the 4th.
 
I know it might sound strange, but Chris Evert (seven time French Open champion) once said that a long match on grass was more tougher on her physically than a long match on clay, because of all the bending and it exhausts the back and the knees a lot more than any other surface.
That might have been the case 20 years ago, when players sliced a lot and bounces weren't as consistent (and players now play with more topspin leading to higher bounce).

PS

The match was a semifinal, when the grass is much slower and higher bouncing than during the first couple of rounds.
 
Murray in 3 because Ferrer tightens up at the business end of sets against the top 4 like clockwork. They'll all be close, but either Murray will find a way to win them or Ferrer will find a way to lose them.
Yeah saw that at WTF. Muzziah for the annihilation.

Hoping for an alert Andy vs knackered Nole final. The new Murray seems to not be donating sets to lower ranked players.
 
I can't see anything other than a straights sets win for Murray here. Possibly in 4 if Ferrer plays lights out but he just doesn't have the firepower to trouble Andy in a best of 5 on this surface.
 
That might have been the case 20 years ago, when players sliced a lot and bounces weren't as consistent (and players now play with more topspin leading to higher bounce).

PS

The match was a semifinal, when the grass is much slower and higher bouncing than during the first couple of rounds.

I still think that the ball stays lower on grass after the bounce compared to any other surface and it forces a player to bend his knees over and over again.
I don't know if the bounce has ever been consistent on the grass (now or 20-30 years ago) - do you have any info/data about it?

By the way, if the grass is much slower/high bouncing than in the first rounds, how did player like Sampras dominate the tournament anyway during 90s, when there was basically no grass on the court in the final stages of the tournament? And why was Federer beating Nadal in the Wimbledon finals, but losing on clay three weeks before that?

The grass is definitely more slippery in the first couple of rounds, but the difference is not as big as the common myth says, IMO.
 
Back
Top