Garhi Shot First
Hall of Fame
Maybe he got them all out of the way early?Wow, just tuned in the stats...
> 100 unforced errors
Maybe he got them all out of the way early?Wow, just tuned in the stats...
> 100 unforced errors
Maybe he got them all out of the way early?
He has a way of responding excellently under pressure, especially of late, so I feel confident for him. He probably went right back to work after this match, studying his performance and trying to fix what went wrong. I love Nishikori's game, too, so I'm hoping for a great battle between them, but I think Djokovic will make it through.I hope so because that was a horrendous performance
If he didn't have some decent number of winners to back it up then he would have lost this match but... glad he's just through, just forget like this match ever happened lol. He'll have his work cut out for him against Nishikori no doubt, hopefully Novak raises his level as the 2nd week rolls on
When you play against a pusher, especially when they are playing so well, you really have to dig deep.
Its looking really tough. If Nishikori can take him 4 sets or more that is a lot of court time before the arch nemesis and then Murray or Wawa likely waiting in the final relatively fresh. See French Open and Toronto last year.wait so djokovic has a tough draw now?
Somdev ??? Why ? Can he hang on that long ? I've only seen him once, and only because he was playing Fedr. Can't remember anything much.
Look people can and should bad mouth simon all they want. You can respect him but you cant tell people to enjoy his style of play. If the majority of tour guys played like simon tennis would be a dead sport and no one would watch.All respect for Simon - he played really well by his standards and executed a tactic of deep no pace flat balls - consistently for most of the match. Plus he was able to chase down some really difficult balls (late 4th set and facing break points towards end of set) - which would have ended the match at 4.
Djokovic didn't play his best, lost some patience (all credit to Simon) and ROS was missing from most of the match, but the way Simon played, with that depth consistency, I think anyone would have had trouble with him yesterday.
On a side note - I find it pretty offensive when people on this board bad mouth other players because they style doesn't suit them - Simon has been around for a long time and is a very smart and difficult player to play against - and a lot of players/fans can learn a lot about tennis tactics if they watch him - when he is on (as was last night) he is trouble for anyone. If he had a better serve, I think he would easily be in the top 10.
P.S. he will make an excellent coach one day
I still have ptsd from that match no way i can watch highlight.Novak was very bad by his standards, but here are the highlights for those who can watch through the whole video.
Wow, 100 UFE.
I'm pretty sure it was 100% UFE for his dropshots ...
what a match. Glued to the idiot box for every single point. This was a tactical shot making contest. Simon played prob his best ball. Djokovic is not in fantastic fabulous form 100 UE's says so however Simon was playing brilliant ball mixing up defense with offense. This might be that 5 set match that gets the out of form player in form. One of the rules of law in majors for the top players over the years has been early 5 setter warms the player up and peaks in the final. Noishikori match will tell us all more.
Oh well, I missed the match, so the highlights were relatively enjoyable for me, especially since they only have good points.I still have ptsd from that match no way i can watch highlight.
It was still a great match imo, quite entertaining and pretty suspenseful until the end. With Simon, one is never guaranteed to hold serve. That's what made things interesting. There are very few players for whom that would be true. If Simon had a bigger serve, he would be very hard to beat. A bit like Ferrer but Simon is sneakier. You never feel like he's playing especially well but he has an uncanny knack for completely derailing the opponent's game and bogging him down in torturous rallies, especially if said opponent likes to attack or paint lines (Fed/Djoko). On top of that, he can lull the opponent to sleep with his grinding style but still hits scathing winners once in a while taking the other guy completely by surprise and causing great frustration/ annoyance. He's like a rattlesnake. Intriguing to watch when the strategy works.Wow, just tuned in the stats...
> 100 unforced errors
That's funny but it's not really true. Djoko can get tired. He did after that monster semi vs Delpo at Wimbledon. Hopefully he will be fine this time around but his draw looks daunting as I can't imagine the Nishi match being an easy one, regardless of outcome (AO is one of Nishi's favorite events) and Fed looks in scintillating form.Once again Nole proving he really is one of those B movie monsters that you just can't kill no matter what.
I think he proved that completeness before.So @veroniquem , the "complete" player makes 100 UFE in a single match and proves his completeness.
A couple things, Simon put on a retrieving performance of a lifetime, he didnt have any really tough matches to get to Djoko and for him its unusual and he was fresh. Your use of "dominate" is out of context. Their matches have been struggles with Djoko not losing a set. It was closer to beingbover in 4 for Djoko than Simon in 5.I know it is not a good comparison. But he played 5 sets against a player he usually dominates. Whether it was down to his poor or Simon's good performance I didn't think about it. He wasn't far away from elimination.
The stats dont tell the whole story, half of those were failed dropshots.Wow, just tuned in the stats...
> 100 unforced errors
Simon already had a 5 setter, in the 2nd round.A couple things, Simon put on a retrieving performance of a lifetime, he didnt have any really tough matches to get to Djoko and for him its unusual and he was fresh. Your use of "dominate" is out of context. Their matches have been struggles with Djoko not losing a set. It was closer to beingbover in 4 for Djoko than Simon in 5.
This could prove useful, save fof the length of time. He will have to perform a little better than this to beat DNish, but DNish not going to run like that for that long either. He has some underlying leg issue. Djoko got into a good rythm of dictating and long rallies doing so. Goid practice IMO, just need to recover.That's funny but it's not really true. Djoko can get tired. He did after that monster semi vs Delpo at Wimbledon. Hopefully he will be fine this time around but his draw looks daunting as I can't imagine the Nishi match being an easy one, regardless of outcome (AO is one of Nishi's favorite events) and Fed looks in scintillating form.
One has nothing to do with the other. Complete doesn't mean infallible or perfect or never having a bad day. It just means that he's the player with most versatility and best offense/defense skills combined imo (in general).So @veroniquem , the "complete" player makes 100 UFE in a single match and proves his completeness.
Is it just me or are you being a bit funny with me recently Nathaniel?You're laughable. You disappeared as soon as Simon won a set and now you're trying to extract out of people that Federer is looking good for #18 in a manner that practically makes Djokovic the underdog.
Lol so true. My husband gets so aggravated with Novak's ds in every match!! Keeps rolling eyes and stuff. I swear he could have been that spectator yelling from the stands. He thinks Boris should fine Novak every time he attempts those lame ds ha ha.The stats dont tell the whole story, half of those were failed dropshots.
It could, given that Nishikori had issues with his wrist in an earlier match.That's funny but it's not really true. Djoko can get tired. He did after that monster semi vs Delpo at Wimbledon. Hopefully he will be fine this time around but his draw looks daunting as I can't imagine the Nishi match being an easy one, regardless of outcome (AO is one of Nishi's favorite events) and Fed looks in scintillating form.
Yes, but his 3rd round was 1:41 long... he basically had 3 days rest with an extra practice session in the middle.Simon already had a 5 setter, in the 2nd round.
Djokovic could have easily had a 2-0 lead if he performed a good overhead on the break point at 4-4. He made it very difficult for himself, this was a scare.
Though I think I would have gave up on the dropshots in say the 2nd set or so he was picking good balls to attempt them on. Usually close to or just inside and Simon way back. They just never went over.Lol so true. My husband gets so aggravated with Novak's ds in every match!! Keeps rolling eyes and stuff. I swear he could have been that spectator yelling from the stands. He thinks Boris should fine Novak every time he attempts those lame ds ha ha.
I hope you're right but I watched part of the Tsonga match. While Tsonga didn't put up a fight (shaky serving in particular), Nishi looked very sharp during rallies, sharper than I had seen him recently. He's very capable of playing so-so in previous events and giving his best at AO. That wouldn't be the first time.It could, given that Nishikori had issues with his wrist in an earlier match.
I think Nishikori is being hyped here again. He lost to Tomic only two weeks ago, Tomic. And he was pushed by Garcia-Lopez in R3. He did beat Tsonga with style but the latter called a MTO.
Is your hubby as big a Novak fan as you vero?Lol so true. My husband gets so aggravated with Novak's ds in every match!! Keeps rolling eyes and stuff. I swear he could have been that spectator yelling from the stands. He thinks Boris should fine Novak every time he attempts those lame ds ha ha.
It could have been better executed IMO.Yes, but his 3rd round was 1:41 long... he basically had 3 days rest with an extra practice session in the middle.
Never felt Djoko was in danger. He kept composed, knew what he had to do and in the end Simon ran out of gas. He racked up alot of errors in the last set himself. The overhead was good, Simon luckily blocked it back and won the ensuing exchange. I dont think he missed an overhead all match...
Look people can and should bad mouth simon all they want. You can respect him but you cant tell people to enjoy his style of play. If the majority of tour guys played like simon tennis would be a dead sport and no one would watch.
I dont think its poor fan ship at all. His game is horribly boring. Its ok for a fan to say that.All I am saying is that - I, personally, don't like when people bad mouth players "just" because of how they play and think its poor "fan-ship".
It was still a great match imo, quite entertaining and pretty suspenseful until the end. With Simon, one is never guaranteed to hold serve. That's what made things interesting. There are very few players for whom that would be true. If Simon had a bigger serve, he would be very hard to beat. A bit like Ferrer but Simon is sneakier. You never feel like he's playing especially well but he has an uncanny knack for completely derailing the opponent's game and bogging him down in torturous rallies, especially if said opponent likes to attack or paint lines (Fed/Djoko). On top of that, he can lull the opponent to sleep with his grinding style but still hits scathing winners once in a while taking the other guy completely by surprise and causing great frustration/ annoyance. He's like a rattlesnake. Intriguing to watch when the strategy works.
I dont think its poor fan ship at all. His game is horribly boring. Its ok for a fan to say that.
I think thats a matter of opinion. For me simon. But i can see people saying raonic or isner. I dont think its poor fandom to say either is. Its just an opinion. And if either of them dominated tennis with their style of play tennis would go into a tailspin.yes wrong thread, but let me ask: who is more boring Simon.. or say Raonic?
I think thats a matter of opinion. For me simon. But i can see people saying raonic or isner. I dont think its poor fandom to say either is. Its just an opinion. And if either of them dominated tennis with their style of play tennis would go into a tailspin.
But its not poor fandom to not like a players playing style.exactly, its all personal - for me its great there is that much variety in players so you can watch different styles compete against one another.
2nd behind FedWhoa, a darn good match. Simon really hung in there with Djokovic, especially in the second set. Great of Simon to push the match to five sets and not give up. Some of the points were incredible, such as Simon's great defense, his putaway two-hander down the line, awesome gets from Djokovic himself; really good ball striking.
Also, @The Green Mile, if I'm not mistaken, you're a big supporter of Simon; is he your favorite player at the moment?