2016 AO R4 - [1] Novak Djokovic vs. [14] Gilles Simon

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    71
  • Poll closed .

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
It was a good match, but more than 4 hours of this kind of tennis is just too much for me.

There should be a different way of tracking UEs. When points go that long someone finally has to miss, so a lot of Novak's UEs were pretty much semi-forced. ;)

It's still fairly early in the tournament. Novak has two days to rest. I think he'll be back to his usual Ultron self.

It was interesting watching someone making Novak impatient. That's mostly why the match went on so long. Novak wanted to win faster and was irritated at being out-Ponged!
I dont like simons style but his movement is pretty freaking incredible.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
It was a good match, but more than 4 hours of this kind of tennis is just too much for me.

There should be a different way of tracking UEs. When points go that long someone finally has to miss, so a lot of Novak's UEs were pretty much semi-forced. ;)

It's still fairly early in the tournament. Novak has two days to rest. I think he'll be back to his usual Ultron self.

It was interesting watching someone making Novak impatient. That's mostly why the match went on so long. Novak wanted to win faster and was irritated at being out-Ponged!
Simon doesn't go for winners and does not hit big but he's very steady and positions himself very well on the court, so he can keep rallying for what seems like forever. The opponent starts losing patience and goes for a bit more and misses. It is a strategy that just works very well for Simon's game.
 

tennisaddict

Bionic Poster
One has nothing to do with the other. Complete doesn't mean infallible or perfect or never having a bad day. It just means that he's the player with most versatility and best offense/defense skills combined imo (in general).

Exhibition of drop shots is proof for the versatility ?
 

Gary Duane

Talk Tennis Guru
Simon doesn't go for winners and does not hit big but he's very steady and positions himself very well on the court, so he can keep rallying for what seems like forever. The opponent starts losing patience and goes for a bit more and misses. It is a strategy that just works very well for Simon's game.
It is certainly a favorable match-up for Simon.
 

Gary Duane

Talk Tennis Guru
Lol yeah the ds leave a lot to be desired but I'm looking at the big picture, not isolated shots.
The funny thing is to me it looked like he got stubborn. "I'm going to keep hitting that damned shot until it works, because I'm going to win the match any way." :)
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
The funny thing is to me it looked like he got stubborn. "I'm going to keep hitting that damned shot until it works, because I'm going to win the match any way." :)
He he he looks that way even in matches he could lose. He keeps insisting on those ds and he loses so many of them! But I have to admit that sometimes when he manages to get them working, they come in handy. It's just that they fail a bit too often for my taste!!
 

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
I'm disappointed in Djokovic's comment in his press conference afterwards > "Actually, it gives me great joy to know that I can't get worse than that, than what I played today."

It's a bit disrespectful to Simon that he wouldn't view it for what it was: an in-form Simon doing exactly what he does best - frustrating his opponents into errors by not giving them the patterns and opportunities they're used to in most matches they play. That wasn't really a bad performance by Djokovic, it was Djokovic taking ages to overcome Simon and having almost no answer to his style of play other than banking on being a fundamentally better player in the end. Tons of players have faced Simon and experienced a day like Djokovic did - Federer included. It's just Simon's brand of extremely smart tennis against players who outgun him shot-wise.

As an added comment, Federer was asked last night about the Djokovic-Simon match and he had this to say - he sums it up perfectly re: Simon's effect on opponents.

Q. We haven't seen Novak play like this in a very long time.
In like what sense?

Q. Hitting a hundred unforced errors.
Yeah. How much did you see Gilles Simon play? I'm just wondering, because I think people miss the point of him. He plays every match, like, that. He makes you miss. He makes you go for the lines and he runs down a lot of balls. A lot of points end in errors, if you like. . . . People just kind of talk maybe -- it's my assumption, I'm not surprised you're asking me. I just feel people talking like he had a horrible day. Of course he can play better, but on the other side, you have somebody who has the fastest legs and he knows exactly what he's doing out there, and it worked almost to the very end. So it was very close for Novak, and he knows that.
 
Last edited:

Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil

Talk Tennis Guru
I'm disappointed in Djokovic's comment in his press conference afterwards > "Actually, it gives me great joy to know that I can't get worse than that, than what I played today."

It's a bit disrespectful to Simon that he wouldn't view it for what it was: an in-form Simon doing exactly what he does best - frustrating his opponents into errors by not giving them the patterns and opportunities they're used to in most matches they play. That wasn't really a bad performance by Djokovic, it was Djokovic taking ages to overcome Simon and having almost no answer to his style of play other than banking on being a fundamentally better player in the end. Tons of players have faced Simon and experienced a day like Djokovic did - Federer included. It's just Simon's brand of extremely smart tennis against players who outgun him shot-wise.

As an added comment, Federer was asked last night about the Djokovic-Simon match and he had this to say - he sums it up perfectly re: Simon's effect on opponents.

Q. We haven't seen Novak play like this in a very long time.
In like what sense?

Q. Hitting a hundred unforced errors.
Yeah. How much did you see Gilles Simon play? I'm just wondering, because I think people miss the point of him. He plays every match, like, that. He makes you miss. He makes you go for the lines and he runs down a lot of balls. A lot of points end in errors, if you like. . . . People just kind of talk maybe -- it's my assumption, I'm not surprised you're asking me. I just feel people talking like he had a horrible day. Of course he can play better, but on the other side, you have somebody who has the fastest legs and he knows exactly what he's doing out there, and it worked almost to the very end. So it was very close for Novak, and he knows that.
Nobody is good enough to frustrate someone into making a triple digit of unforced errors, especially not someone who hardly ever misses the shots and is called a machine. Djokovic was rubbish, everyone saw that. On any other day, it wouldn't even get close to 5 sets.
If Federer thinks Simon has the fastest legs, he better think again.
 

moonballs

Hall of Fame
Nobody is good enough to frustrate someone into making a triple digit of unforced errors, especially not someone who hardly ever misses the shots and is called a machine. Djokovic was rubbish, everyone saw that. On any other day, it wouldn't even get close to 5 sets.
If Federer thinks Simon has the fastest legs, he better think again.
Simon is not the fasted but he was very impressive of not showing any fatigue in the fifth set. He was the true steady eddy from the start to the end.

I am wondering if Djokovic played like that due to his insistence of beating Simon on Simon's term, plus he wanted to practice his dropshot!
 

The Green Mile

Bionic Poster
Fed does sum it up perfectly really IMO. They did play 4.5 hours and 50 games (many with multiple deuces played) plus the TB of tennis last night. Add in Djokovic struggling to finish off points time and time again, and many long rallies, 100 UEs doesn't seem that unreasonable really. Simon sometimes really gets to you, no matter how good you are. Djokovic started to overthink, and his shot selection let him down at times. The Simon effect. Almost every player has witnessed it before.

And Simon may not have the fastest legs, but he's right up there. He can also keep it up.
 

3fees

G.O.A.T.
Your Question, You Keep Quiet,,Lol

Djokovic got extended by Ue's not constructing each point and still won ..lol


Cheers
3Fees :)
 
Last edited:

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
And Simon may not have the fastest legs, but he's right up there. He can also keep it up.
Yep, I think what Federer was getting at is Simon's anticipation, understanding of patterns of play and his opponent's favourite go-to shots are so top notch it means it is difficult to rush him without basically going for a winner - which in turn generally means hitting more errors.

The attributes Simon shows in his understanding of tennis patterns is what will make him an extremely good coach in the future. He's the sort of guy Dimitrov needs to spend time with imo.
 
N

Nathaniel_Near

Guest
You've definitely been a bit more grouchy with me than usual in your recent posts babe. :(

Nope. I respond to what I see. Don't forget we recently had a great conversation on Snooker. Your pessimism as a fan though is laughable. If Djokovic bounces back with a great performance against Kei he'll be right back on track. If he mugs it against Kei then we'll talk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gn

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
I have to relate something that is gonna please our paranoid friend in here. My husband watched the match this afternoon (delayed)and after 4 sets of this charade raised his eyebrows and said "the only explanation I can see to this is that somebody paid Novak to play 5 sets. The wild errors in the 2nd set TB seem particularly bizarre/uncharacteristic and Djoko's shot decisions during this match simply make no sense at all " I was like: nooooooooo, not you too!!
On 2nd viewing though, my own thought is that he must have ingested some gluten by mistake. His degree of sluggishness was nothing short of puzzling (until start of 5th) and the weather didn't seem to be hot or muggy. Simon's game plan, strategy or execution are not really enough to explain the extent to which Djoko was off his game, timing and accuracy.
My husband added that if he brought that disposition to the Nishi match, he would get blasted off the court like a flake in a blizzard. His eyes widened big as he added: "maybe it is time for Murray to win another slam"
Ha ha ha ha ha oops :p
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
I'm disappointed in Djokovic's comment in his press conference afterwards > "Actually, it gives me great joy to know that I can't get worse than that, than what I played today."

It's a bit disrespectful to Simon that he wouldn't view it for what it was: an in-form Simon doing exactly what he does best - frustrating his opponents into errors by not giving them the patterns and opportunities they're used to in most matches they play. That wasn't really a bad performance by Djokovic, it was Djokovic taking ages to overcome Simon and having almost no answer to his style of play other than banking on being a fundamentally better player in the end. Tons of players have faced Simon and experienced a day like Djokovic did - Federer included. It's just Simon's brand of extremely smart tennis against players who outgun him shot-wise.

As an added comment, Federer was asked last night about the Djokovic-Simon match and he had this to say - he sums it up perfectly re: Simon's effect on opponents.

Q. We haven't seen Novak play like this in a very long time.
In like what sense?

Q. Hitting a hundred unforced errors.
Yeah. How much did you see Gilles Simon play? I'm just wondering, because I think people miss the point of him. He plays every match, like, that. He makes you miss. He makes you go for the lines and he runs down a lot of balls. A lot of points end in errors, if you like. . . . People just kind of talk maybe -- it's my assumption, I'm not surprised you're asking me. I just feel people talking like he had a horrible day. Of course he can play better, but on the other side, you have somebody who has the fastest legs and he knows exactly what he's doing out there, and it worked almost to the very end. So it was very close for Novak, and he knows that.

Oh please! I am far from a Djokovic fan but Djokovic is absolutely right. He won the match after having 100 UEs. How much worse can he get? Credit to Simon for pushing Djokovic to five sets but the truth of the matter is that Djokovic was playing like complete crap for his standards. Look at the Djokovic-Simon h2h and their previous matches which have all been pretty comfortable wins for Djokovic. Nobody but a complete idiot predicted Djokovic would lose that match vs Simon. Simon expended all that energy only to come up short YET AGAIN.

Djokovic has been tested and will probably go on to fly through all the other opponents. I hope I'm wrong about it though and that Niskikori, Federer, etc. can get rid of this persistent bugger Djokovic finally! :p
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
LOL, all been pretty comfortable wins? I've watched every single Djokovic vs Simon match. All 11 of them. And I can tell you that only about 3 of them were comfortable wins for Djokovic.

Then we must be watching two different opponents. The bottom line is the h2h is 10-1. That's pretty darn comfortable.
 

The Green Mile

Bionic Poster
Then we must be watching two different opponents. The bottom line is the h2h is 10-1. That's pretty darn comfortable.
Yeah the H2H tells one story, yet the matches tell another completely different story. Djokovic wins nearly all the matches, because he is naturally the more superior and dangerous player. But he doesn't win them all without a fight.

Not that I thought Simon would cause the upset (albeit I was believing at the end of the 4th, quickly shut down).
 

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
Oh please! I am far from a Djokovic fan but Djokovic is absolutely right. He won the match after having 100 UEs. How much worse can he get?...
The point is not whether he is right, it's whether he is an uncharitable dooshbag about it. Simon is most of the reason Djokovic had poor stats, not Djokoivc mere;y having a bad day. It's the same for many of Simon's matches - he has a genius ability to deny people their favourite patterns of play, positions on court so they press more than they're comfortable doing - which is exactly what happened in this match. A detail obvious to those who've seen Simon do the same thing to many others over the years.
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
The point is not whether he is right, it's whether he is an uncharitable dooshbag about it. Simon is most of the reason Djokovic had poor stats, not Djokoivc mere;y having a bad day. It's the same for many of Simon's matches - he has a genius ability to deny people their favourite patterns of play, positions on court so they press more than they're comfortable doing - which is exactly what happened in this match. A detail obvious to those who've seen Simon do the same thing to many others over the years.

Well, that's a whole other story and you won't get an argument from me on that.:p
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Well it was a pretty safe bet tbh, saying that Djokovic will win in the end. Sorry if I sounded cranky, hadn't slept all night because I decided to watch that dreadful match.
You missed another dreadful match. Raonic vs Wawrinka. ;)
 
Top