this is the maximum number of games he'll leave for the nadalVerdasco is telling us with pride.
He will lose in 5.
oooo.. can't wait for this! judging by Nadal's form and his growing penchant, prowess, and preference for the dtl and inside out fhs over the cc fh, I go with Rafa here in 3 or 4... having said that, Nadal's ability to hit some cc fhs well will be important against the big lefty fh of tabasco. Nadal's cc fh ain't what it used to be but in this matchup, he'll use that shot more sparingly I would think
MC 2010 - Most onesided final at masters level 6-0 6-1
Nando is allergic to Tabasco but will overcome this to scratch his seven-year itch for revenge in five...3-6 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 in a Fabioesque fashion.
Just so you know, I'm likely to pick Rafa's opponent in every match he plays during this tournament (more so if his opponent is a dangerous player), because I sincerely believe there is a good chance he will lose the match.
I think if The Ernests were able to get into 3R we will have a nice test early. Chardy will probably spoil that plan but he could also be a hurdle to clear.Come on don't get carried away! Nadal "should" be fine until the potential Raonic/Wawrinka match. I think that match would be his first real dangerous test. What is pretty clear is that he won't beat Djokovic if they meet but he certainly has a good chance with everybody else.
Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:Just so you know, I'm likely to pick Rafa's opponent in every match he plays during this tournament (more so if his opponent is a dangerous player), because I sincerely believe there is a good chance he will lose the match.
You know that article is from almost three years ago, right? I'm pretty sure he gives a damn now, especially where Novak Djokovic is concerned, or at least he should be, after that a**-whooping in Doha.Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:
Seven-time French Open champion Rafael Nadal says he isn’t concerned about who is tabbed as the favorite before he and world No. 1 Novak Djokovic face off in the Roland Garros semifinals.
“I don’t give a damn about it,” Nadal said. “I try and play my best tennis, and the least of my concerns is to know if I’m favored or not. These are words that will be carried away by the wind. What will stay is my tennis, my match, and who is going to win the match. That’s reality. But the rest is speculation beforehand.”
http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2013...mn-who-favorite-semifinal/47831/#.Vpuk8SqLTNN
You know that article is from almost two years ago, right? I'm pretty sure he gives a damn now, especially where Novak Djokovic is concerned, or at least he should be after that ***-whooping in Doha.
Rafa will have the last laugh. You heard it here first.Hopefully he can get more than two games a set next time he meets Djoko...
Nothing has changed. Rafa believes that predictions are worthless. If Rafa cared about predictions, how would that help?You know that article is from almost three years ago, right? I'm pretty sure he gives a damn now, especially where Novak Djokovic is concerned, or at least he should be, after that a**-whooping in Doha.
I remember that match. What a blowout. I remember both FeVer and the crowd cheered when he got his one game.
Rafa was Mr. April that clay season. I was so excited to be at the US Open that fall that I can't remember -- did he even lose a match on the way to Roland Garros?
Actually you brought Novak into it. I didn't say anything about Djokovic until your post - which explicitly mentions Djokovic.Anyway, this is a Nadal/Verdasco match thread, why bring Novak into it?
Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:
Seven-time French Open champion Rafael Nadal says he isn’t concerned about who is tabbed as the favorite before he and world No. 1 Novak Djokovic face off in the Roland Garros semifinals.
http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2013...mn-who-favorite-semifinal/47831/#.Vpuk8SqLTNN
So this is bringing Djokovic into it by posting a quotation of Rafa saying he doesn't give a chorizo about predictions in general, in response to a question about an upcoming match against Djoker.Actually you brought Novak into it. I didn't say anything about Djokovic until your post - which explicitly mentions Djokovic.
Well, yes, because you accused me of bringing Djokovic into our discussion, when in fact it was you who mentioned Djokovic first. I didn't even allude to him - expressly or implicitly - before your post (quoted below). You, on the other hand, explicitly mentioned Djokovic here:So this is bringing Djokovic into it by posting a quotation of Rafa saying he doesn't give a chorizo about predictions in general, in response to a question about an upcoming match against Djoker.
I'm merely pointing out the incongruity of your allegation that I brought Djokovic into it - which is categorically untrue.Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:
Seven-time French Open champion Rafael Nadal says he isn’t concerned about who is tabbed as the favorite before he and world No. 1 Novak Djokovic face off in the Roland Garros semifinals.
“I don’t give a damn about it,” Nadal said. “I try and play my best tennis, and the least of my concerns is to know if I’m favored or not. These are words that will be carried away by the wind. What will stay is my tennis, my match, and who is going to win the match. That’s reality. But the rest is speculation beforehand.”
http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2013...mn-who-favorite-semifinal/47831/#.Vpuk8SqLTNN
I think if The Ernests were able to get into 3R we will have a nice test early. Chardy will probably spoil that plan but he could also be a hurdle to clear.
No, I said Chardy will probably spoil that matchup.We discussed Ernests' match in an Ernest thread.
You're thinking Mr. No Effort is going to try hard enough to get past Chardy?
For some reason I thought it said poop break :|Rafa in straights. Verdasco will start going downhill after a poor tie break
chardy-verdasco wouldn't be uninteresting either...No, I said Chardy will probably spoil that matchup.
And I said that, aussi!chardy-verdasco wouldn't be uninteresting either...