2016 Australian Open 1R: [5] Rafael Nadal vs Fernando Verdasco

WWW?

  • Rafa in 3

    Votes: 17 23.3%
  • Rafa in 4

    Votes: 20 27.4%
  • Rafa in 5

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • Fernando in 3

    Votes: 3 4.1%
  • Fernando in 4

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • Fernando in 5

    Votes: 23 31.5%

  • Total voters
    73

NBP

Hall of Fame
Tuesday, 19 January 2016...

Deserves a thread, no?

Rafa leads the H2H 14-2...
Last meeting: 2015 Hamburg - Nadal won 36 61 61
Repeat of the 2009 semifinal epic...

Rafael-Nadal-001.jpg


This will be tight... Reeeally tight in my opinion. Could easily be a five setter.
 

irishnadalfan1983

Hall of Fame
Verdasco is down at number 47 - I presume he hasn't been up to much recently? Anyone know his recent form in the last few months.

Still a dangerous opponent.
 
oooo.. can't wait for this! judging by Nadal's form and his growing penchant, prowess, and preference for the dtl and inside out fhs over the cc fh, I go with Rafa here in 3 or 4... having said that, Nadal's ability to hit some cc fhs well will be important against the big lefty fh of tabasco. Nadal's cc fh ain't what it used to be but in this matchup, he'll use that shot more sparingly I would think
 
of course I take the head to head and their history into account as well (that's a given). Nadal has the edge obviously, despite uncomfortable changing of patterns on serve and other shots.
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
H2H 15-2. One loss at Blue clay and another last year when Nadal was losing to anybody.
Aside from the epic semifinal. The notable matches.

MC 2010 - Most onesided final at masters level 6-0 6-1
French 2008 - 6-1 6-0 6-2
 

ruerooo

Legend
oooo.. can't wait for this! judging by Nadal's form and his growing penchant, prowess, and preference for the dtl and inside out fhs over the cc fh, I go with Rafa here in 3 or 4... having said that, Nadal's ability to hit some cc fhs well will be important against the big lefty fh of tabasco. Nadal's cc fh ain't what it used to be but in this matchup, he'll use that shot more sparingly I would think

I don't want Rafa to wear himself out; he'll go 100% against FeVer if he doesn't think it through.
 

ruerooo

Legend
MC 2010 - Most onesided final at masters level 6-0 6-1

I remember that match. What a blowout. I remember both FeVer and the crowd cheered when he got his one game.

Rafa was Mr. April that clay season. I was so excited to be at the US Open that fall that I can't remember -- did he even lose a match on the way to Roland Garros?
 

terribleIVAN

Hall of Fame
Well, that was anti-climatic.

1-6, 7-6, 6-2, 6-4.

Fernando made Rafa mightly sweat for 2 sets, then it was all she wrote.

Hope Rafa didn't spend all his bullets already.
 
Just so you know, I'm likely to pick Rafa's opponent in every match he plays during this tournament (more so if his opponent is a dangerous player), because I sincerely believe there is a good chance he will lose the match.
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
Just so you know, I'm likely to pick Rafa's opponent in every match he plays during this tournament (more so if his opponent is a dangerous player), because I sincerely believe there is a good chance he will lose the match.

Come on don't get carried away! Nadal "should" be fine until the potential Raonic/Wawrinka match. I think that match would be his first real dangerous test. What is pretty clear is that he won't beat Djokovic if they meet but he certainly has a good chance with everybody else.
 

stringertom

Bionic Poster
Come on don't get carried away! Nadal "should" be fine until the potential Raonic/Wawrinka match. I think that match would be his first real dangerous test. What is pretty clear is that he won't beat Djokovic if they meet but he certainly has a good chance with everybody else.
I think if The Ernests were able to get into 3R we will have a nice test early. Chardy will probably spoil that plan but he could also be a hurdle to clear.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Just so you know, I'm likely to pick Rafa's opponent in every match he plays during this tournament (more so if his opponent is a dangerous player), because I sincerely believe there is a good chance he will lose the match.
Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:

Seven-time French Open champion Rafael Nadal says he isn’t concerned about who is tabbed as the favorite before he and world No. 1 Novak Djokovic face off in the Roland Garros semifinals.

“I don’t give a damn about it,” Nadal said. “I try and play my best tennis, and the least of my concerns is to know if I’m favored or not. These are words that will be carried away by the wind. What will stay is my tennis, my match, and who is going to win the match. That’s reality. But the rest is speculation beforehand.”

http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2013...mn-who-favorite-semifinal/47831/#.Vpuk8SqLTNN
 
Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:

Seven-time French Open champion Rafael Nadal says he isn’t concerned about who is tabbed as the favorite before he and world No. 1 Novak Djokovic face off in the Roland Garros semifinals.

“I don’t give a damn about it,” Nadal said. “I try and play my best tennis, and the least of my concerns is to know if I’m favored or not. These are words that will be carried away by the wind. What will stay is my tennis, my match, and who is going to win the match. That’s reality. But the rest is speculation beforehand.”

http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2013...mn-who-favorite-semifinal/47831/#.Vpuk8SqLTNN
You know that article is from almost three years ago, right? I'm pretty sure he gives a damn now, especially where Novak Djokovic is concerned, or at least he should be, after that a**-whooping in Doha.
 

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
If this goes five with a rafa win then he is in for a long open. He cant really afford a brutal five setter in round one.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
You know that article is from almost three years ago, right? I'm pretty sure he gives a damn now, especially where Novak Djokovic is concerned, or at least he should be, after that a**-whooping in Doha.
Nothing has changed. Rafa believes that predictions are worthless. If Rafa cared about predictions, how would that help?

Anyway, this is a Nadal/Verdasco match thread, why bring Novak into it?
 
Last edited:

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
I remember that match. What a blowout. I remember both FeVer and the crowd cheered when he got his one game.

Rafa was Mr. April that clay season. I was so excited to be at the US Open that fall that I can't remember -- did he even lose a match on the way to Roland Garros?

I think not.
 
Anyway, this is a Nadal/Verdasco match thread, why bring Novak into it?
Actually you brought Novak into it. I didn't say anything about Djokovic until your post - which explicitly mentions Djokovic.

Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:

Seven-time French Open champion Rafael Nadal says he isn’t concerned about who is tabbed as the favorite before he and world No. 1 Novak Djokovic face off in the Roland Garros semifinals.

http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2013...mn-who-favorite-semifinal/47831/#.Vpuk8SqLTNN
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Actually you brought Novak into it. I didn't say anything about Djokovic until your post - which explicitly mentions Djokovic.
So this is bringing Djokovic into it by posting a quotation of Rafa saying he doesn't give a chorizo about predictions in general, in response to a question about an upcoming match against Djoker.
 
So this is bringing Djokovic into it by posting a quotation of Rafa saying he doesn't give a chorizo about predictions in general, in response to a question about an upcoming match against Djoker.
Well, yes, because you accused me of bringing Djokovic into our discussion, when in fact it was you who mentioned Djokovic first. I didn't even allude to him - expressly or implicitly - before your post (quoted below). You, on the other hand, explicitly mentioned Djokovic here:
Here is what Rafa thinks about predictions:

Seven-time French Open champion Rafael Nadal says he isn’t concerned about who is tabbed as the favorite before he and world No. 1 Novak Djokovic face off in the Roland Garros semifinals.

“I don’t give a damn about it,” Nadal said. “I try and play my best tennis, and the least of my concerns is to know if I’m favored or not. These are words that will be carried away by the wind. What will stay is my tennis, my match, and who is going to win the match. That’s reality. But the rest is speculation beforehand.”

http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2013...mn-who-favorite-semifinal/47831/#.Vpuk8SqLTNN
I'm merely pointing out the incongruity of your allegation that I brought Djokovic into it - which is categorically untrue.

Between you and I, who mentioned Djokovic first? You did. Therefore, you brought Djokovic into it. Talk about "the pot calling the kettle black".
 
Last edited:

Krish872007

Talk Tennis Guru
I think RAFA takes this in 3.
Verdasco is not the same Verdasco of 2009, and RAFA is playing better than last year. He's fully prepared for this AO.
 

ruerooo

Legend
I think if The Ernests were able to get into 3R we will have a nice test early. Chardy will probably spoil that plan but he could also be a hurdle to clear.

We discussed Ernests' match in an Ernest thread.

You're thinking Mr. No Effort is going to try hard enough to get past Chardy?
 

#Stanimal

Rookie
Rafa in 3 sets, I can't see today's Verdasco troubling Nadal at all(would be surprised if the takes one set).

Nadal needs to show that he's not down yet after the defeat in doha, I hope he plays with joy and evolves during the tournament.
 

Chicharito

Hall of Fame
As I said in the other thread:

I doubt a packed press room is somewhere Fernando will want to be tomorrow.

So ironically he will not win this match even if he could.
 
Top