2016 Miami Open ATP World Tour Masters 1000 - Round 4 Djokovic vs. Thiem

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    38
  • Poll closed .

Meles

Bionic Poster
they wont face each other on clay
With Thiem as 13 seed, I believe 1 in 4 chance of meeting in round of 16 at Monte Carlo. Thiem would need to win his first two matches; Djokovic 1 match. Otherwise I think it would be a semifinal or final encounter which would be a big step for Thiem, but very possible with the right draw. If its not Djokovic at Monte Carlo, Murray, Fed, or Wawa will be the R16 draw. Wow. Can't wait.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
59 times did Thiem serve
102 times did Novak serve

When, if ever, did the guy needing to serve so much more win the match? :confused::confused::eek::D

Congrats @Meles, Thiem showed promise. But Novak was poor as well for his standards on serve and on many of his groundies 6-34 in W/UE.
Watched every second and it was an amazing match. Thiem won a ton of Djokovic's first serve points. Murray is the hard court career leader in this stat with 34%. Thiem was 38-39% against one of the best hard court players of all time at his peak. These points were Thiem's weakness last year. If Thiem keeps improving that part of his game he will go on a rampage.

Thiem did not serve well in this match at 64%. If he had been in the 70s like at Acapulco this match would have really been something. Thiem's points won on first was really high too especially in the first set.

The huge problem I see for Thiem ongoing against Djokovic was the 2nd serve points number. It was so bad he might as well have kept on hitting first serves for 2nd serves. I believe Djokovic was playing rather well given how he dominated Thiem's 2nd service. He was also getting after Thiem's first better in the second set, but Thiem also was not serving well at all in the second.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
you guys give no credit to Thiem.
he took some of Djoko's confidence.
Exactly. The Djokovic service was under intense pressure the entire match. Two easy service games (one actually at 30 all) and the rest of the Djokovic games were deuce or worse. That is a whole lot of pressure and if Thiem had been better on his own serve and broken through just one more time this match would have gotten really tight for the world number one. My take watching this with friend and another on the horn in the second set was that blood is in the water in this matchup. Thiem now has an elite player he will be able to beat before too long and this happened on Djokovic's favorite surface not Thiem's which is clay.
 

merwy

G.O.A.T.
Disagree with this completely. Thiem is deadly at the end of sets. It wouldn't have gotten any easier if he had broken in either of those games. Cracks were appearing in Nole's armor in this match, particularly the serving. He barely closed out either set. Hopefully the next match is more brutal and we'll see what both are made of when it's really close at the end of set. After seeing this match, my money is on Thiem. He will have him.
We will see who is right. I will refer back to this conversation if I'm right and you will admit that you were wrong.
 

Druss

Hall of Fame
Isn't competition relative?

I have personally played tennis over the years with only my friend. Do you honestly think I'd be able to improve 100x when the player on the other side isbt very good?

Competition is relative.
The reason why Djokovic is the 'monster' he is today is because of Federer and Nadal. There is no way in hell he would have been this good had there not been any Fedal.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
This match reminded me of the Simon one at AO (Djoko made a HUGE number of UEs + tons of DFs). The difference is that Thiem is not as good/experienced as Simon, so all those errors didn't even cost Novak a set!
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
Unfortunately, I could not watch this match. But I am mystified that the match is regarded as a great one with such awful stats. How is this possible? :confused:
I don't think the tennis was that great to be honest. There were a few fantastic rallies but buried in such a huge pile of errors! I think the only thing that got people excited about this match is the fact that Thiem got so many BPs but to be honest, a lot of those were due to ugly unforced and only a minority to inspired play by Thiem.
Thiem has depth and power in his ground game and a good serve but nothing terribly spectacular. He misses a lot.
ETA: Novak never even had to get into 3rd gear. Even at a below average level (by his standard), he was never in any danger to lose the match or even a set. You could feel he had a comfy safety margin. He could have got broken a couple more times but the overall feeling is that it wouldn't have changed much to final outcome
 
Last edited:

Meles

Bionic Poster
Winners and UEs are misleading stats. Lots of forced errors in this match. The player forcing the error basically hit a winner. Both players covered the court extremely well so balls that might have been outright winners were either brought back into play or almost brought back into play. Thiem was hitting a very heavy ball, so Djokovic did not have a rash of bad errors. ATP tour does not keep winner UE stats in their records.

Take away stats for this match:
Djokovic served 69% which is above his 2016 average of 65% (some of this might have been some conservative first serving to avoid having to hit second serves due to DFs, pressure, etc.)
Thiem served at 64% which is below his 2016 average of 65%

Djokovic kept Thiem to 29% points won on 2nd serve which is very impressive (Thiem averages 56%)
Thiem won 39% of Djokovic's 1st serve points which is very, very high (in comparison Djokovic only won 26% of Thiem's 1st serve points).

Thiem overall had an excellent returning in this match which is pretty obvious given that Djokovic was in trouble in the vast majority of his service games.

As a Thiem fan the worst stat in this match is 29% of 2nd serve points won. Its hard to beat someone with that low a number. 50% is kind of a minimum number. The best stat was the 39% of points won on Djokovic's first serve. That is an incredible number and usually results in a lot of breaks. The career leader in this stat on hard courts is Murray at 34% against the field. Thiem has been improving this weakness and got great results in this match against an all time great.

For Djokovic, the DFs were horrible, but much of this was from aggressive serving due to the pressure his service games were under. Someone should look at them, but I bet most of these serves were 100 mph plus. Winnings 71% of Thiem's 2nd serve points was the dominating stat. Its pretty rare to lose when returning and playing that well on the opponents 2nd serve.

For Thiem to beat Djokovic he has to have a big serving day with a high percentage of first serves in play. He can do that and was in the 70s winning Acapulco (79% in the final.) If he does that and serves big on 2nd serves (risks some DFs) he would be competitive with Djokovic on hard courts. If Thiem can return at all time great levels on first serves he's probably going to win all sorts of majors given the rest of his game. Keep an eye on this number when looking at Thiem match results. If it keeps improving on average, look out. (Incidently Nick Kyrgios has had a similar and even better turn around on returning stats this year; look out!:confused:)
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
I don't think the tennis was that great to be honest. There were a few fantastic rallies but buried in such a huge pile of errors! I think the only thing that got people excited about this match is the fact that Thiem got so many BPs but to be honest, a lot of those were due to ugly unforced and only a minority to inspired play by Thiem.
Thiem has depth and power in his ground game and a good serve but nothing terribly spectacular. He misses a lot.
ETA: Novak never even had to get into 3rd gear. Even at a below average level (by his standard), he was never in any danger to lose the match or even a set. You could feel he had a comfy safety margin. He could have got broken a couple more times but the overall feeling is that it wouldn't have changed much to final outcome
Missing the forest for the trees looking at UEs.
Thiem won 74% of his first serve points against the best returner in the game. That is spectacular.
Novak won 71% of Thiem's second serve points and that is even more spectacular.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
Watched every second and it was an amazing match. Thiem won a ton of Djokovic's first serve points. Murray is the hard court career leader in this stat with 34%. Thiem was 38-39% against one of the best hard court players of all time at his peak. These points were Thiem's weakness last year. If Thiem keeps improving that part of his game he will go on a rampage.

Thiem did not serve well in this match at 64%. If he had been in the 70s like at Acapulco this match would have really been something. Thiem's points won on first was really high too especially in the first set.

The huge problem I see for Thiem ongoing against Djokovic was the 2nd serve points number. It was so bad he might as well have kept on hitting first serves for 2nd serves. I believe Djokovic was playing rather well given how he dominated Thiem's 2nd service. He was also getting after Thiem's first better in the second set, but Thiem also was not serving well at all in the second.
I didn't catch the first few games, but saw the rest with interest. A couple of things
- you're overstating how "poor" Thiem served. He served at what can be expected. Given how much pressure Djoko puts on his 2nd, it's a rather good stat to be able to keep his average first serve percentage (1 % down isn't really a difference). You can't expect him to serve in the 70's - certainly not against Djoko.
- yes, Djoko's at his peak, but that doesn't mean that he plays every match at his peak. He didn't serve this many DF's since 2010 some stat showed. He made routine errors of the forehand and sometimes off the backhand time and time again from good positions. Some of that could be do to the heaviness of the Thiem ball, but certainly not all. I mean in some games, he made 3-4 forehands longs, when trying to go down the line for it. Is that peak Djoko to you? Not to me.
- I would also put a pause a bit with being that impressed with Thiem's number against Djoko's first serve. It ain't finding the spots as well as it sometimes does right now and he got treatment for his back in the Berdych match (where all time pigeon Birdman won 31 % of Djoko's 1st serve and is now 0-20 in their HC meetings). Sure, it's a GREAT stat if he can repeat it. But I think on Tuesday, it had a lot to do with Djoko as well.
- what Djoko did well in this match was his ROS on Thiem's second and his ability to boggle down, when down BP and aside from the DF, not hand Thiem an easy break on those despite all the regulation errors he gave in the rest of the match.
- what Thiem did great was to get to all those BP's, hang with Djoko in the rallies, not be afraid to go big and not losing his spirits despite not converting a single BP on his own.

Overall, I also see very good signs, but not quite the ones you're seeing.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Winners and UEs are misleading stats. Lots of forced errors in this match. The player forcing the error basically hit a winner. Both players covered the court extremely well so balls that might have been outright winners were either brought back into play or almost brought back into play. Thiem was hitting a very heavy ball, so Djokovic did not have a rash of bad errors. ATP tour does not keep winner UE stats in their records.

Take away stats for this match:
Djokovic served 69% which is above his 2016 average of 65% (some of this might have been some conservative first serving to avoid having to hit second serves due to DFs, pressure, etc.)
Thiem served at 64% which is below his 2016 average of 65%

Djokovic kept Thiem to 29% points won on 2nd serve which is very impressive (Thiem averages 56%)
Thiem won 39% of Djokovic's 1st serve points which is very, very high (in comparison Djokovic only won 26% of Thiem's 1st serve points).

Thiem overall had an excellent returning in this match which is pretty obvious given that Djokovic was in trouble in the vast majority of his service games.

As a Thiem fan the worst stat in this match is 29% of 2nd serve points won. Its hard to beat someone with that low a number. 50% is kind of a minimum number. The best stat was the 39% of points won on Djokovic's first serve. That is an incredible number and usually results in a lot of breaks. The career leader in this stat on hard courts is Murray at 34% against the field. Thiem has been improving this weakness and got great results in this match against an all time great.

For Djokovic, the DFs were horrible, but much of this was from aggressive serving due to the pressure his service games were under. Someone should look at them, but I bet most of these serves were 100 mph plus. Winnings 71% of Thiem's 2nd serve points was the dominating stat. Its pretty rare to lose when returning and playing that well on the opponents 2nd serve.

For Thiem to beat Djokovic he has to have a big serving day with a high percentage of first serves in play. He can do that and was in the 70s winning Acapulco (79% in the final.) If he does that and serves big on 2nd serves (risks some DFs) he would be competitive with Djokovic on hard courts. If Thiem can return at all time great levels on first serves he's probably going to win all sorts of majors given the rest of his game. Keep an eye on this number when looking at Thiem match results. If it keeps improving on average, look out. (Incidently Nick Kyrgios has had a similar and even better turn around on returning stats this year; look out!:confused:)

For Thiem to beat Djokovic, he is also going to have to hope that Djokovic does not bring is A game. If he does, nothing Thiem can do currently.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
For Thiem to beat Djokovic, he is also going to have to hope that Djokovic does not bring is A game. If he does, nothing Thiem can do currently.
Agree on HC, on clay Thiem's topspin might be enough to go toe to toe with a well playing (not a beasting) Djoko as well.
Both won 58 % of their service points and 42 % of their return points the other day. Granted, as I stated above, it was a Djoko quite a bit from his best, but at least some of that was probably due to Thiem's ball. On clay, Thiem's ball is more difficult to handle (but the first serve is easier to handle).
We shall see soon enough, wouldn't bet on Thiem vs. Djoko on clay just yet, but if they both played at their level from the other day and the match was on clay (two big if's), it could have had a different outcome.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Agree on HC, on clay Thiem's topspin might be enough to go toe to toe with a well playing (not a beasting) Djoko as well.
Both won 58 % of their service points and 42 % of their return points the other day. Granted, as I stated above, it was a Djoko quite a bit from his best, but at least some of that was probably due to Thiem's ball. On clay, Thiem's ball is more difficult to handle (but the first serve is easier to handle).
We shall see soon enough, wouldn't bet on Thiem vs. Djoko on clay just yet, but if they both played at their level from the other day and the match was on clay (two big if's), it could have had a different outcome.

I agree pretty much with everything you say. Thiem has a good game, and matches will be fun between them, he can compete for sure, but if Djokovic is in one of those moods, for me regardless of surface, currently there is only one winner.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
I agree pretty much with everything you say. Thiem has a good game, and matches will be fun between them, he can compete for sure, but if Djokovic is in one of those moods, for me regardless of surface, currently there is only one winner.
Agreed as well, but that's the case for every player on tour except Fed on fast hard and grass in best of 3 and Wawa on slow surfaces if Wawa's having one of his days.
Edit: After a consultation with Hitman, I've decided to add Murray on grass to the list. Murray was a better grass player than Djoko and has won every set between them on it, but I'm not sure that's how it'll play out going forward - would he have done better vs. Djoko than Fed last year? Doubt it. But he's still probably enough of a challenge to deserve a mention.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Agreed as well, but that's the case for every player on tour except Fed on fast hard in best of 3 and Wawa on slow surfaces if Wawa's having one of his days.

Murray God Mode on grass will give Djokovic a run for his money also.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
Murray God Mode on grass will give Djokovic a run for his money also.
I was actually about to add him and then came in doubt. While Murray has won every single set between them on grass, we haven't seen anything near Djoko's own god mode in those matches, have we? But sure - let's add him for now (and then I also avoid offending Mainad too much).
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
I was actually about to add him and then came in doubt. While Murray has won every single set between them on grass, we haven't seen anything near Djoko's own god mode in those matches, have we? But sure - let's add him for now (and then I also avoid offending Mainad too much).

I really want to see this match at Wimbledon this year, these two have unfinished business at SW19. ;)
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
Agree on HC, on clay Thiem's topspin might be enough to go toe to toe with a well playing (not a beasting) Djoko as well.
Both won 58 % of their service points and 42 % of their return points the other day. Granted, as I stated above, it was a Djoko quite a bit from his best, but at least some of that was probably due to Thiem's ball. On clay, Thiem's ball is more difficult to handle (but the first serve is easier to handle).
We shall see soon enough, wouldn't bet on Thiem vs. Djoko on clay just yet, but if they both played at their level from the other day and the match was on clay (two big if's), it could have had a different outcome.

I can't see it. I think if Thiem and Djokovic meet in a few weeks on clay Djokovic will paste him, i.e. no different outcome. I'm really not seeing all of this extreme hype with Thiem, not yet at least.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
I can't see it. I think if Thiem and Djokovic meet in a few weeks on clay Djokovic will paste him, i.e. no different outcome. I'm really not seeing all of this extreme hype with Thiem, not yet at least.
They each won 42 % of the points on the opponent's serve and Djoko had to hit serve 73 % more serves - I'm yet to come across a match, where one player hit that many more first serves and still won. You're being too negative again cc - as @Steve0904 would put it.
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
They each won 42 % of the points on the opponent's serve and Djoko had to hit serve 73 % more serves - I'm yet to come across a match, where one player hit that many more first serves and still won. You're being too negative again cc - as @Steve0904 would put it.

I'm with tennis_pro on this one. It was still a straight set relatively routine win for Djokovic. I'm not seeing where the overhype is coming from. I think people are so desperate for young players to come through. Until he starts to beat top ten players regularly or he can take a set off Djokovic, I'm sticking to my story. ;)

P.S. I think if they meet on clay in a couple of weeks, it will be a straight set win for Djokovic.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
I'm with tennis_pro on this one. It was still a straight set relatively routine win for Djokovic. I'm not seeing where the overhype is coming from. I think people are so desperate for young players to come through. Until he starts to beat top ten players regularly or he can take a set off Djokovic, I'm sticking to my story. ;)

P.S. I think if they meet on clay in a couple of weeks, it will be a straight set win for Djokovic.
there's nothing routine about a straight sets win, where you are facing 15 BP's, have to hit 102 serves to your opponents 59 and just win 7 more points than your opponent and more or less every single one of your service games goes to deuce or BP and some last for 10 and 15 minutes.

Now Djoko didn't play a great match and he's got more levels to play at, so it's very possible the next match might be another straight setter. But I couldn't disagree more with you and tennis_pro on the assessment of this specific match
 

Steve0904

Talk Tennis Guru
They each won 42 % of the points on the opponent's serve and Djoko had to hit serve 73 % more serves - I'm yet to come across a match, where one player hit that many more first serves and still won. You're being too negative again cc - as @Steve0904 would put it.

Well when I watched the match I just wasn't worried about future meetings or hype. That's all I can say. Not every match between Djokovic and a "young gun" (in quotes because he's already 22) has to be super close scoreline wise for the future's sake. On its own merits this was a match that easily could've turned on a few points despite the routine scoreline so Thiem did relatively well in this specific match only (because we all assumed a straight set win for Djoker anyway). But if you're looking for the next great challenger for Djokovic on a HC or another future double digit slam winner, you'll probably end up disappointed.

To me, it was extremely obvious that Thiem was nervous because even when he did get in the BP's (i.e not miss 2nd serve returns) he missed relatively easy shots. One of which I remember near the end of the match (maybe in the 5-4 game) where Thiem went back behind Djokovic and would've had the point if he just hit the ball in the court, but he let out a huge grunt (like most nervous people do at that stage) and proceeded to hit it wide because he knew he had the point and got overexcited. Hence my "This is all nerves" comment. And that's only one example.

So like I said, when I watched the match I took it for what it was in the present without thought of the future or "hype" or whatever else.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Well when I watched the match I just wasn't worried about future meetings or hype. That's all I can say. Not every match between Djokovic and a "young gun" (in quotes because he's already 22) has to be super close scoreline wise for the future's sake. On its own merits this was a match that easily could've turned on a few points despite the routine scoreline so Thiem did relatively well in this specific match only (because we all assumed a straight set win for Djoker anyway). But if you're looking for the next great challenger for Djokovic on a HC or another future double digit slam winner, you'll probably end up disappointed.

To me, it was extremely obvious that Thiem was nervous because even when he did get in the BP's (i.e not miss 2nd serve returns) he missed relatively easy shots. One of which I remember near the end of the match (maybe in the 5-4 game) where Thiem went back behind Djokovic and would've had the point if he just hit the ball in the court, but he let out a huge grunt (like most nervous people do at that stage) and proceeded to hit it wide because he knew he had the point and got overexcited. Hence my "This is all nerves" comment. And that's only one example.

So like I said, when I watched the match I took it for what it was in the present without thought of the future or "hype" or whatever else.
Thiem has a higher risk game and misses shots. Against a player that covers the court as well as Djokovic most of these misses are not a surprise, but that 2nd run around forehand was a bad miss. Posting shortly my updated notes about what happened on every one of those BPs.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
I didn't catch the first few games, but saw the rest with interest. A couple of things
- you're overstating how "poor" Thiem served. He served at what can be expected. Given how much pressure Djoko puts on his 2nd, it's a rather good stat to be able to keep his average first serve percentage (1 % down isn't really a difference). You can't expect him to serve in the 70's - certainly not against Djoko.
- yes, Djoko's at his peak, but that doesn't mean that he plays every match at his peak. He didn't serve this many DF's since 2010 some stat showed. He made routine errors of the forehand and sometimes off the backhand time and time again from good positions. Some of that could be do to the heaviness of the Thiem ball, but certainly not all. I mean in some games, he made 3-4 forehands longs, when trying to go down the line for it. Is that peak Djoko to you? Not to me.
- I would also put a pause a bit with being that impressed with Thiem's number against Djoko's first serve. It ain't finding the spots as well as it sometimes does right now and he got treatment for his back in the Berdych match (where all time pigeon Birdman won 31 % of Djoko's 1st serve and is now 0-20 in their HC meetings). Sure, it's a GREAT stat if he can repeat it. But I think on Tuesday, it had a lot to do with Djoko as well.
- what Djoko did well in this match was his ROS on Thiem's second and his ability to boggle down, when down BP and aside from the DF, not hand Thiem an easy break on those despite all the regulation errors he gave in the rest of the match.
- what Thiem did great was to get to all those BP's, hang with Djoko in the rallies, not be afraid to go big and not losing his spirits despite not converting a single BP on his own.

Overall, I also see very good signs, but not quite the ones you're seeing.
In Acapulco, Thiem served at 74%, 73%, and 78% in the final with 22 aces and 1 DF. That ace count is not happening against Djokovic, but the higher serve percentage in a big match is very possible for Thiem. Thiem has been in a bit of a serving slump since and so 64% was above average for what he's been doing in IW and Miami (best match was 67%.)

I've updated my match notes that were posted in another thread to include the speed of serve on the Djokovic DFs. You can blame the DFs on a supposed back issue that was brewing, but Djokovic only had 1 DF against Berdych. I'll admit that the Djokovic serve might be down a bit in speed possibly for some reason and certainly Berdcyh getting 31% of first serve points against the champ is a bit troubling when Berdy averages 30% on hard courts. Shave 5% off the Thiem number if you like, but even 34% is a very impressive number against a player who usually only allows 26% in 2015 and 24% in 2016. Djokovic averaged 113 mph on first serves and 87 mph on second serves. The speeds of the DFs were 92, 97, 99, 87, 98, 108, 99, 78 and 99 mph. Most of these were from the new deepish 2nd serve that has been getting accolades. It did not do so well under pressure is my take, with an unexpected rash of DFs at the beginning of the match. Djokovic DF'd a break and a match point with this serve. The following also shows how Djokovic served on the break points.

Updated Notes:
On Break points Djokovic served 8 of 15 with a few conservative first serves. On 2nd serve, Djokovic went big early with 107 mph, slow one, 116 mph, a slow one, DF, a slow one, and finally a slow one.
Thiem got 5 of the 8 first serves in play (one an Ace). Thiem got all of the 2nd serve back into play except for one. All of the rallies were longish rallies off these returns except for one where Thiem had the misfortune of attempting to return and volley off of a 116 mph Djokovic 2nd serve.

Set 1:
1st Djoko service 7/7 behind first 0/4 behind 2nd. Multiple deuces. 92 mph DF and 97 mph DF

(Djoko takes advantage of Thiem 2nd serves decisively for easy break.)

2nd Djoko service (3 BPs): (over ten minutes) 99 mph DF gives Thiem 1st BP opp.
1. 120 mph Djoko first. Long rally and Djokovic got the winner
2. Ace
3. Big 107 mph Djokovic 2nd, Defensvie slice floats just wide after long rally

3rd Djoko service:
Deuce game

4th Djoko service: opening 87 mph DF (4th)
4. Thiem goes back on 82 mph 2nd serve return and tries to hit heavy backhand topspin return on , deep

5th Djoko service: (9.5 minute game)
5. Deep forehand return of 119 mph Djoko first.
6. 86 mph Djokovic kick 1st serve to Thiem backhand - Thiem backhand pass seemingly in for the break after longish rally, both players sit down for review, Hawkeye out!
Thiem fist pumps his way to another break opp
7. 90 mph Djokovic kick 1st serve to Thiem backhand - long rally with Djoko forcing issue with down the line forehand that gets the error off defensive slice
Thiem wins longish rally to get another break opp
8. Thiem has misfortune on 116 mph Djokovic 2nd - Djokovic crisply returns aggressive Thiem return and volley (error)

0 for 8 in first set, but nothing overtly wrong except the final tally. Tough play from Djokovic as usual.


Set 2:
6th Djoko service:
Djoko holds from 30 all

(Thiem gives Djoko easy break on his own service.)

7th Djoko service: (Two big winners fuel 15-40 opp) at 15 all 88 mph first serve miss, then 98 mph DF, later 108mph DF (6th)
9. Thiem maybe doesn't do enough with 2nd serve return - Djoko eventually works him over with two excellent forehands
10. 121 mph first serve gets error on Thiem chip return

8th Djoko service:
impressive Thiem aggressions and foot work get 15-30, then 30-40
11. Djoko goes big on 2nd and just long. 99 mph DF (7th) to give up the break
(Horrible Thiem service game and Djoko breaks with ease.)

9th Djoko service: 78 mph DF
Thiem's lacklust play continues and easy hold.

Final Djoko service: (over 14 minutes)
Thiem saves first MP with nice forehand return of first and some aggression gets UE
Thiem gets upperhand with nice aggression off conservative 110 mph Djoko first serve. BP
12. Big Djoko serve down T gets error from Thiem forehand
Djoko DFs match point at 99 mph. (9th)
Thiem chip backhand returns 119 mph Djoko first and then huge cross forehand to save 3rd MP
Thiem takes over on 88 mph Djoko 2nd service and quickly forces backhand error with heavy, heavy forehand. BP
13. Thiem with good forehand return of Djokovic conservative 106 mph 1st, but Djoko eventually gets upper hand in rally and hits forceful two hander with great depth and Thiem UE
Thiem returns 119 mph Djoko first with deep top spin backhand and eventually takes over the point with his backhand to for UE. BP
14. Thiem with nice, deep aggressive retun of 88 mph Djoko 2nd. Coughs up bad UE on runaround forehand while in control of point.
(First run around was fine with good footwork, the 2nd one was error and those feet didn't take as many adjustment steps.) A bad miss.
Thiem with nice deep top spin backhand return of 122 mph Djoko first and impressively takes over point to get another UE for BP.
15. Very nice deep forehand return of wide Djokovic 119 mph first serve. Thiem eventually tries to run around and go down the line and just misses deep.
Thiem nearly gets another BP off 119 mph Djokovic serve. Dominating with forehand and just misses wide with forehand (might have been in, but Thiem out of challenges, a big mistake on his part.)
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
I agree pretty much with everything you say. Thiem has a good game, and matches will be fun between them, he can compete for sure, but if Djokovic is in one of those moods, for me regardless of surface, currently there is only one winner.
Agree on HC, on clay Thiem's topspin might be enough to go toe to toe with a well playing (not a beasting) Djoko as well.
Both won 58 % of their service points and 42 % of their return points the other day. Granted, as I stated above, it was a Djoko quite a bit from his best, but at least some of that was probably due to Thiem's ball. On clay, Thiem's ball is more difficult to handle (but the first serve is easier to handle).
We shall see soon enough, wouldn't bet on Thiem vs. Djoko on clay just yet, but if they both played at their level from the other day and the match was on clay (two big if's), it could have had a different outcome.
I would contend Thiem has a matchup advantage with Djokovic.

Despite everyone saying Djokovic did not play that great in this match. He gets an A- in my book because of his domination on 2nd serve return points. Djokovic repeated this performance against Berdych and performed well above his 2016 numbers and this was against two top players. The UE count for both players is malarkey. Most were of the forced variety and Djokovic did very well overall against the Thiem heavy ball; Djokovic wouldn't have had that 2nd serve points won number if he were a UE machine. The UE machine is putting up career best numbers against opponents on 2nd serve points this year. Ignore UEs and look at what Djokovic is achieving on these points; that is the real metric. He was A+ in that department, but A- overall because of the serve in this match.

When Nole puts it all together on hard courts like he often does in finals its hard to imagine Thiem beating him. However if Thiem serves well and cuts down the number of second serve points he can hang even with A+ Djokovic. Thiem's overall game against the field is nowhere near as good, but I would contend he has a matchup advantage with Djokovic. Thiem's dominace of first serve points returning and serving could carry him to victory even on hard courts. (won 88% of first serve points in set 1) Thiem is a phenomenal closer and is getting better and stronger by the week this year. If he'd broken back late in the two sets it would have been very interesting to see if Djokovic would have shored up the cracks in his serving or worsened under more pressure. I doubt Thiem would have blinked and that is one of his greatest attributes. We saw the level Thiem can bring against the world number 1 at the end of sets; 25 minutes worth in two games.

The matchup on clay would have Djokovic favored overall based on stats in general. Thiem does win more of his first serve points on clay though. But I see a huge matchup issue vs Thiem. If Thiem has his A game its going to be very, very interesting as I think with this matchup advantage on clay Thiem may not be stopped by any Djokovic. Both players are capable of channeling very high levels of play in matches; Thiem particularly at the end of sets and the match. Hope we see this and it will be interesting to see which one takes the match when the sets are very close (both on serve or Thiem up a break.) Thiem is not supplanting the world number 1, but their matchup is very interesting and might turn into a rivalry if Thiem can start beating top 5 players. He should get a shot at one on Monte Carlo clay again in round of 16 since Thiem will be the 13th seed. 1 in 4 chance its Djokovic!
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
I would contend Thiem has a matchup advantage with Djokovic.

Despite everyone saying Djokovic did not play that great in this match. He gets an A- in my book because of his domination on 2nd serve return points. Djokovic repeated this performance against Berdych and performed well above his 2016 numbers and this was against two top players. The UE count for both players is malarkey. Most were of the forced variety and Djokovic did very well overall against the Thiem heavy ball; Djokovic wouldn't have had that 2nd serve points won number if he were a UE machine. The UE machine is putting up career best numbers against opponents on 2nd serve points this year. Ignore UEs and look at what Djokovic is achieving on these points; that is the real metric. He was A+ in that department, but A- overall because of the serve in this match.

When Nole puts it all together on hard courts like he often does in finals its hard to imagine Thiem beating him. However if Thiem serves well and cuts down the number of second serve points he can hang even with A+ Djokovic. Thiem's overall game against the field is nowhere near as good, but I would contend he has a matchup advantage with Djokovic. Thiem's dominace of first serve points returning and serving could carry him to victory even on hard courts. (won 88% of first serve points in set 1) Thiem is a phenomenal closer and is getting better and stronger by the week this year. If he'd broken back late in the two sets it would have been very interesting to see if Djokovic would have shored up the cracks in his serving or worsened under more pressure. I doubt Thiem would have blinked and that is one of his greatest attributes. We saw the level Thiem can bring against the world number 1 at the end of sets; 25 minutes worth in two games.

The matchup on clay would have Djokovic favored overall based on stats in general. Thiem does win more of his first serve points on clay though. But I see a huge matchup issue vs Thiem. If Thiem has his A game its going to be very, very interesting as I think with this matchup advantage on clay Thiem may not be stopped by any Djokovic. Both players are capable of channeling very high levels of play in matches; Thiem particularly at the end of sets and the match. Hope we see this and it will be interesting to see which one takes the match when the sets are very close (both on serve or Thiem up a break.) Thiem is not supplanting the world number 1, but their matchup is very interesting and might turn into a rivalry if Thiem can start beating top 5 players. He should get a shot at one on Monte Carlo clay again in round of 16 since Thiem will be the 13th seed. 1 in 4 chance its Djokovic!

Very interesting. I am looking forward to their encounters on clay in the coming weeks. I like Thiem, and it would be great to see him make an impact.
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
there's nothing routine about a straight sets win, where you are facing 15 BP's, have to hit 102 serves to your opponents 59 and just win 7 more points than your opponent and more or less every single one of your service games goes to deuce or BP and some last for 10 and 15 minutes.

Now Djoko didn't play a great match and he's got more levels to play at, so it's very possible the next match might be another straight setter. But I couldn't disagree more with you and tennis_pro on the assessment of this specific match

This is the key. Thiem is a good young player with a good attitude who has made some progression but: a) at the end of the day he's still far from beating Djokovic and he squandered way too many break points and b) he needs to beat other top ten players on a regular basis for me to think he's more than another potential top ten player.
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
This is the key. Thiem is a good young player with a good attitude who has made some progression but: a) at the end of the day he's still far from beating Djokovic and he squandered way too many break points and b) he needs to beat other top ten players on a regular basis for me to think he's more than another potential top ten player.
Agree with the exception that I consider him a pretty safe bet as a top-10'er. How far higher he'll climb, we'll probably get an indication of this year already
 

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
I would contend Thiem has a matchup advantage with Djokovic.

Despite everyone saying Djokovic did not play that great in this match. He gets an A- in my book because of his domination on 2nd serve return points. Djokovic repeated this performance against Berdych and performed well above his 2016 numbers and this was against two top players. The UE count for both players is malarkey. Most were of the forced variety and Djokovic did very well overall against the Thiem heavy ball; Djokovic wouldn't have had that 2nd serve points won number if he were a UE machine. The UE machine is putting up career best numbers against opponents on 2nd serve points this year. Ignore UEs and look at what Djokovic is achieving on these points; that is the real metric. He was A+ in that department, but A- overall because of the serve in this match.

When Nole puts it all together on hard courts like he often does in finals its hard to imagine Thiem beating him. However if Thiem serves well and cuts down the number of second serve points he can hang even with A+ Djokovic. Thiem's overall game against the field is nowhere near as good, but I would contend he has a matchup advantage with Djokovic. Thiem's dominace of first serve points returning and serving could carry him to victory even on hard courts. (won 88% of first serve points in set 1) Thiem is a phenomenal closer and is getting better and stronger by the week this year. If he'd broken back late in the two sets it would have been very interesting to see if Djokovic would have shored up the cracks in his serving or worsened under more pressure. I doubt Thiem would have blinked and that is one of his greatest attributes. We saw the level Thiem can bring against the world number 1 at the end of sets; 25 minutes worth in two games.

The matchup on clay would have Djokovic favored overall based on stats in general. Thiem does win more of his first serve points on clay though. But I see a huge matchup issue vs Thiem. If Thiem has his A game its going to be very, very interesting as I think with this matchup advantage on clay Thiem may not be stopped by any Djokovic. Both players are capable of channeling very high levels of play in matches; Thiem particularly at the end of sets and the match. Hope we see this and it will be interesting to see which one takes the match when the sets are very close (both on serve or Thiem up a break.) Thiem is not supplanting the world number 1, but their matchup is very interesting and might turn into a rivalry if Thiem can start beating top 5 players. He should get a shot at one on Monte Carlo clay again in round of 16 since Thiem will be the 13th seed. 1 in 4 chance its Djokovic!
nice posts - but where's the match up advantage iyo? In Thiem's first serve? Not shot and rally related?
 
Top