2016 Wimbledon Semifinal - [3] Roger Federer vs. [6] Milos Raonic

Who?


  • Total voters
    150

70後

Hall of Fame
I hope Fed breaks FAST. If he has matchpoints that are break points, he will lose them almost for sure.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Fed was found out big time against nadal and Djokovic. You know that deep done!
Deep down, you know djokovic is so lucky that federer is past his prime. If not, he might end up with 1 wimby+USO combined

federer, past his prime, was the one who "exposed" peak djokovic at RG and nearly at the USO in 11 ..
 
Yeah that kid cleaning up every clay tournament there was and being world #2 behind Fed.
He was prime.
Please don't do this. Let's all just enjoy what Federer is doing right now. Ignore the haters. The fact that he is up right now and could possibly win this and indeed the tournament is like having a hot rod shoved up their asses. They're in enough pain already as it is.
 

joekapa

Legend
1 - It will probably be 50-50 at the start but the crowd will get behind the player who's behind in the score to try and prolong the match.
2 - Murray will pepper Fed's BH and it won't survive this time.

Fed will eat up Murray's 2nd serve. However given what I've seen so far and given what the journos said about Fed huffing and puffing long after his Cilic match. I can't see Fed winning unless he wins in straights.
He will get the "doctors" in.
 

Tardigrade

Banned
you are delusional ...nadal wasn't a kid in 2006 wimby, let alone 2007 wimby final where he played his best tennis ...
He was barely 20, and Federer was heavily favoured to win the match. Djokovic was able to beat Nadal a lot more times than Federer. Has beaten Nadal on clay more times than anyone else, never lost 3-1-0 in a final, and has pushed Nadal at the FO a lot harder than Federer ever did.
 
Deep down, you know djokovic is so lucky that federer is past his prime. If not, he might end up with 1 wimby+USO combined

federer, past his prime, was the one who "exposed" peak djokovic at RG and nearly at the USO in 11 ..
Nearly? That's still a loss, plus prime fed lost to Djoko in us open 2010 too!
 

TheFifthSet

Legend
Please don't do this. Let's all just enjoy what Federer is doing right now. Ignore the haters. The fact that he is up right now and could possibly win this and indeed the tournament is like having a hot rod shoved up their asses. They're in enough pain already as it is.
Here here.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
I still count RG 2015, Nadal beat Djokovic at FO a fair few times when Djokovic's wasn't at his best (06-08) at the FO, so I count 2015.
I don't really count RG 06, RG 07 for djokovic either.

But RG 08 ? LOL, you are delusional ..

If you count beating Nadal at Wimbledon in 2006 as a legit victory, then RG 2015 is also a legit victory.
maybe , you should go and watch/check out .. There was a wide gigantic gap b/w his form in those tournaments. He came into the final holding serve 80 times in a row. Had something like 17 W to 3 UEs in set 3. After a nerwy 1st set he played really well ..

IN RG 15, he was a complete shadow of himself ..
 
Top