What you say simply means that the people with good/bad taste have the right to have good/bad taste, not that there cannot be made a difference between good and bad taste.
Lol, I can't believe you're trolling me all because I said Raonic's performance was disappointing and that it was a pretty boring match. If you watched it then I don't see how you could disagree with me.
Lol, I can't believe you're trolling me all because I said Raonic's performance was disappointing and that it was a pretty boring match. If you watched it then I don't see how you could disagree with me.
Rafa might have to thank the Umpire for that victory; her warning to Rafa in the second set forced Rafa to play faster and procrastinate less, which took his mind away from the score.
Now it Roger's turn to procrastinate in the semi vs Wawa, thinking he's going possibly face his nemesis should he advance.
Maybe another Robredo quit job in the making?
Then stop being such a naughty boy.I never said I disagreed with you
That's why I can't wait for this match to start, I want to see what Grigor is made of. So far, he's been really impressive, but Nadal is a different beast. Having said that, Dimitrov has already pushed Nadal several times (Cincinnati, Monte Carlo, AO), so I really expect a great match with this new Dimitrov and rejuvenated Nadal.
Tbh someone like fed will always be 10X more enjoyable for me and while Djokovic might not exactly be my cup of tea I much prefer him to nadal and for that matter enjoy fed/Novak matches which is imo a far more underrated rivalry in contrast to the awful match up that is fedal.
Yep. Djokovic stands closer the baseline and on an average is more aggressive than Nadal. I think his SF versus Roger last year was crazy good. There was nothing Roger could've done about it. Nadal is too slow and too boring. His patterns are predictable and the only advantage he has is that he plays those patterns perfectly when confident because well, he doesn't have other options.
Taste is subjective because no one can decide what is good or bad taste.What you say simply means that the people with good/bad taste have the right to have good/bad taste, not that there cannot be made a difference between good and bad taste.
Except Roddick was never much of a volleyer and Raonic is supposed to be a big server.
Nadal forehand better in this tournament compare to terrible stuff we see the last 2 years. In this match it was good but at times he again start to make mistakes. Strange still very strange that why this errors out of nowhere star to creep in to his game when you think he found the right balance.
Definitely.
Maybe it will be a reason to regain his fire. He did say that Federer & Nadal out of the picture, was not enough of a challenge for him. If he get's angry, Federer and nadal will go hiding, as they did in the last few years.
Well they werwe saying the same about Rafa in 2014, 2015, 2016....no ?
I think neither are done from winning at least 3 more titles. Health be willing.
You can say what you like, but these are the facts from the ATP website:Very solid performance from Nadal but I can't believe how disappointing Raonic was. Not sure if he hit a single backhand winner throughout and those six set points he let slip through his fingers in the 2nd set, dear oh dear.
He really did choke like a hooker, as @The_Order would so eloquently put it.
the former option came to pass..milos still chokes. hurrah and huzzah for mr g. head.
Yup. Novak has had fed's number in the last few years but overall they are much more evenly matched and you are bound to get some aggressive play. Tbh it's kind of amusing seeing Rafa fans argue with Novak fans over who is more boring
Who won the remaining baseline points?
