speedysteve
Legend
Must try and get a feed for the final. YouTube has them sometimes. At least they seem to have the highlights reel.
Could not qualify for FO. Will need wilde carde there too, I hear.How did Maria play without Meldonium inside her system?
disgusting by the umpire
Did she give warnings before ?
Hahaha imagine if the umpire pulled another Cedric Mourier right there that would have been funny
WTA is not wimpy like the ATP. Must serve in 20 seconds or less after the last point. No Walkabouts!This is unbelievable.. how long has it been since a player has received a point penalty for time violation? and what a time to do it too ..
corrupt umpire
Bring out Serena's speech.Laura should ask the umpire "are you upset that I won? Cause you've been against me all match!"
Laura should ask the umpire "are you upset that I won? Cause you've been against me all match!"
Bring out Serena's speech.
Ain't just the WTA buddy.The WTA is predictably unpredictable.
Does Evian also distill a vodka? That broad is so f****** (I don't want to say stupid, because she's at least shrewd; I don't want to say confused, because speaking out of both sides of you ass isn't necessarily because you're confused. You could be a habitual liar.) full of 'it. She says they "put on a good show", then gets all pissy, feminazi over criticisms of the noise SHE makes. If she were so concerned about putting on a good show, she wouldn't act like such a c*** (I really hate that word, but she's THE perfect example of one) when someone brings up HER aesthetically unpleasing "orgasmic high-pitched grunts", or how she/they look.Me at 1:58 every time someone comments on grunts
Gosh! You really don't like her!Does Evian also distill a vodka? That broad is so f****** (I don't want to say stupid, because she's at least shrewd; I don't want to say confused, because speaking out of both sides of you ass isn't necessarily because you're confused. You could be a habitual liar.) full of 'it. She says they "put on a good show", then gets all pissy, feminazi over criticisms of the noise SHE makes. If she were so concerned about putting on a good show, she wouldn't act like such a c*** (I really hate that word, but she's THE perfect example of one) when someone brings up HER aesthetically unpleasing "orgasmic high-pitched grunts", or how she/they look.
Like I said, "habitual liar". Too much partying, not enough clear thinking. And we all know you'll do "ANYTHING" to win Wimbledon, the Australian Open, etc. Cut your poor mother's throat, take a 10 minute timeout for an anxiety attack, what ever. Nothing's too low for you. We got it. Li Na got it, and gets it, you self-righteous hag. I really hope her poor baby doesn't have colic, because I sure as f*** wouldn't want to be at that psycho's mercy.
For every Assastanka, there's 20 who keep their holes shut when they hit the ball. FYB
I think Stosur has the same chance of winning that I do of becoming the Ohanian's new nanny. But I like your other picks. I'd LOVE Bacsinszky to win the whole thing, but, as you wrote, injuries/off-form. I love her game when she's on, but, like Sigemund das Sea Monster, everything has to be working for them to win. If Sharapova doesn't play quallies, goes straight into the main draw, she'll make it to the final, even though I expect a lot of upsets. Look for Squeaky Ostapenko, and Kasatkina to kick some A. I like the new chick who won Biel, too. And Pliscova's clone. ;^)BCome on, Maria's played 3 matches. They weren't exactly against the best of the best players as well.. Having her as co-favourite seems a bit excessive.
She's not even in the main draw unless she gets a wildcard (which seems unlikely). So she'll have to play 3 qualifying matches and then 7 main draw ones to win the title.
I'm not shocked by Muguruza's odds. As you said, she's the defending champ. Secondly, she regained some form this year with the Brisbane SF, Aus Open QF, Indian Wells QF, Miami 4R etc.
As for who i'm picking? It's tough. Despite what I said about Maria, she is a real threat but can she win 7 and maybe even 10 matches in a row? I don't know.
But here are the players i'm keeping an eye on:
Muguruza - all the reasons I said earlier.
Halep made the RG final in 2014 and she almost defeated Sharapova in the final. She can win it this year (as long as she avoids Lucic-Baroni and as long as it doesn't rain and Stosur can hit the ball hard)
Cibulkova could be one to watch. Made the RG SF in 2009 and QF in 2012, reached the Premier Mandatory Madrid clay final last year.
Stosur. Yep, crazy I know given her form. But she's always a clay threat. RG SF in 2009, 2012 and 2016. Final in 2010. Madrid SF last year. If the surface is anything like last year with the rain, she could blitz the field.
Svitolina- RG QF in 2015 plus 4R in 2016 where she lost to Serena. Won RG juniors in 2010. Good record against top players. Has a habit of beating top players and then losing though.
Kuznetsova- won the title in 2009, final in 2006, SF in 2008, QF in 2007, 2011, 2013 and 2014. Has regained her form in the past 18 months, top 10 player. Definite threat.
Safarova- finalist in 2015. Poor form and bad injuries since then but you never know. Could make an appearance.
Bacsinszky- SF in 2015, QF in 2016. Unfortunately has had injuries as of late so her form is off.
Then there's a bunch of players who are typically crap on clay so it's hard to know with them
Konta- never passed the 1R
Kerber- lost 1R last year, 3R twice before that. Just one RG QF.
Pliskova- horrendous form at slams, only made the 2R.
Wozniacki- hasn't gone past the 3R since 2010. Hasn't done much at the big clay events (Madrid and Rome) since 2011.
And then there's always Kvitova. SF in 2012. Her form in Madrid in 2015 was some of the best tennis i've seen, some of the best i've seen. Unsure if she'll even play though, she'd be one of my top picks if it wasn't for the stabbing.