is there a thread for Dimitrov - Edmund? I wasn't going to watch it but it looks like here I am
Murray is done, so he may as well beIf Edmund makes the final he'd be the next British number 1 overtaking Murray...
dammit the ausopen website isn't playing the match, what is wrong w them. Anyone have a stream?
Graciastry watching the Spanish stream
Edmund defeats 3rd seed Dimitrov.
Means for the first time since the 2008 Australian Open that there will be an unseeded semifinalist.
That slam it was actually two unseeded SFists (Safin and Schuttler), it'll also be two this time round with Edmund AND Chung/Sandgren.
Well now I'm tilted
Nadal d. Cilic
Dimitrov d. Edmund
Sandgren d. Chung
Federer d. Berdych
Murray is done, so he may as well be
Nah, Murray will be 31 when he comes back, he still has at least 2/3 years to win titles.
Sandgren being interviewed by ESPN, having to defend his alt-right views..apparently deleted many tweets supporting them
stressing his Christianity
Dimitrov better not lose to Edmund today after his performance in the last round
Nadal d. Cilic
Dimitrov d. Edmund
Sandgren d. Chung
Federer d. Berdych
Yes baby!
dude is effed up, now will try and clean up his image
deleting the tweets is good. If he gets PR help and stops tweeting non sports stuff he can move on.
It would be way more shocking than last year. We know what Federer's capable of, but this Chung guy is a complete unknown.
I think he will lose in the QF/SF and I would bet money on the fact that he cannot beat Fed or Nadal. There are several deficiencies in the Korean's game - not least his service.
Novak was not 100% and the match was close with Chung. Tennis is a game of inches. Had Djokovic been a little healthier (or not coming after a long layoff) he would have probably won each of those sets that he lost. In other words, a tight straight sets victory.
As much as I like Chung, he is likely to be the type of player who has a fairy tale tournament, not as winner but a spoiler. But then disappears completely. In short: The youngster is not likely to be a future top player or a slam champion.
Sandgren being interviewed by ESPN, having to defend his alt-right views..apparently deleted many tweets supporting them
stressing his Christianity
Just imagine. If he was praising Fidel Castro and spouting far left platitudes like Colin Kaepernick the media would be in his corner.
This could've been a perfect opportunity for Kyrgios to make a fairytale run to the final.
at the end of the day, it's whoever shows up.This was really a squandered opportunity for him. It's amazing a player with his serve could lose three tiebreaks.
Dimitrov has got to be kicking himself as well.
Guardian:
Tennys Sandgren deletes tweets after denying far-right sympathies at Australian Open
- US player follows a number of ‘alt-right’ figures on Twitter
- Says far-right views clash with his Christian beliefs
Tue 23 Jan 2018
Tennys Sandgren, the last remaining American in the Australian Open men’s singles draw, has deleted years-worth of tweets after denying he is an alt-right sympathiser.
The 26-year-old reached the quarter-finals of the tournament after an upset victory over the No5 seed, Dominic Thiem, on Monday but questions over his political views have swirled over the weekend and he was challenged at a post-match press conference.
Since facing the media, posts on his Twitter feed since July 2014 have been wiped.
Earlier this month, Sandgren retweeted a video by Nicholas Fuentes, a Boston University student who received death threats after attending the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville last year. Sandgren also follows a number of controversial figures on Twitter, including Tommy Robinson the former leader of the far-right English Defence League, and Dan Roodt a South African once described by John Oliver as a purveyor of “some of the finest examples of vintage bigotry”. Sandgren also described “Pizzagate”, a conspiracy theory linking Hillary Clinton to a paedophile ring as “sickening and the collective evidence is too much to ignore”.
Sandgren was challenged over his views by a reporter after his victory over Thiem. “Look, who you follow on Twitter I feel doesn’t matter even a little bit,” he said. “What information you see doesn’t dictate what you think or believe. I think it’s crazy to think that. I think it’s crazy to assume that. To say, well, he’s following X person, so he believes all the things that this person believes, I think it’s ridiculous. I think that’s ridiculous.”
Sandgren has also debated racial injustice in America with fellow tennis player James Blake on Twitter. During the exchange he denied systemic racism exists in the US because the country elected a black president.
Tennys Sandgren(@TennysSandgren)
I just don't know how a country that practices systematic racism elected a black pres, twice
September 12, 2016
The world No97 also denied he supported far-right theories. “No. No, I don’t. I find some of the content interesting, but no I don’t. Not at all,” Sandgren said. “As a firm Christian, I don’t support things like that. I support Christ and following Him and that’s what I support.”
I have 2 words for you: Joe ArpaioWhy do people act there's something wrong with that part? Yes, racism still exists and probably will be forever, but systemic? Comon, such an exaggeration. Systemic racism was from 1800-1970something. And his argument about a black president is actually quite a good one.
Is it even going to matter when he fades back into irrelevancy after he loses?deleting the tweets is good. If he gets PR help and stops tweeting non sports stuff he can move on.
Apparently, Grigor Dimitrov is 112th out of the 128 players at this Australian Open based on second serve points won
Sits at only 39%.
That's abysmal.
Sandgren being interviewed by ESPN, having to defend his alt-right views..apparently deleted many tweets supporting them
stressing his Christianity