Nadal15thslam
Hall of Fame
Zverev or Nadal will be the best winners. Both hated by Fed fans + the bonus of Fed not winning Wimbledon.Anyone but Federer![]()
Zverev or Nadal will be the best winners. Both hated by Fed fans + the bonus of Fed not winning Wimbledon.Anyone but Federer![]()
I thought you had it as twice initially. you edited it ?
yes, the 2nd part is true.
Jut butthurt because they have to wait another day to post their "Nadal is number one thread."
@paranoidandroid is paranoid.Zverev or Nadal will be the best winners.
Yes it was twice initially as I totally forgot 2006 wimby bagel.....
And fed is really really insane in that matter if 2008 RG F is the only match where he faced a bagel
Zverev winning Wimbledon would kill the sport.Zverev or Nadal will be the best winners. Both hated by Fed fans + the bonus of Fed not winning Wimbledon.
Insane.....in this century, that's the only bagel he's faced.
he faced 3 bagels in 1999.
Zverev winning Wimbledon would kill the sport.
Do you want that?![]()
If Zverev pulls out or loses early then I agree.Anyone but Nadal.
@abmk , can you give numbers of bagels faced by other ATGs ?? (Nad, djok, for this era and samp, aga for previous era)
Rafa is almost 5 years younger than Roger.
Yeah, it's funny. Now apparently Fed fans must not dare hope he'll show up in better form at Wimbledon.
He was better last year but it's not like didn't have dips in his level either as evidenced by losses to Donkey and 40 year old Haas.
go to ultimatestatistics.com
search for the player
click on matches tab
Click on advanced button (adv.)
There is a filter by match score ( in the 3rd row of options) -- the 2nd one by left.
choose set score , 0-6.
Website not opening bro
Can you please p.m. me the full url???
Anyone but Nadal.
Insane.....
1999 was a s**t baby fed though
No one other than Nadal*Anyone but Nadal.
Every sane person knows there will be a better version of Federer at Wimbledon. Let's hope it won't be enough to win the tournament.That poster is a joke.
As long as Fed loses in a third set tiebreak after squandering multiple match points (preferably on serve), then I am happy that order is restored and will fancy his chances at W.
I am disappointed in Fed's lack of commitment.You were so close.![]()
Every sane person knows there will be a better version of Federer at Wimbledon. Let's hope it won't be enough to win the tournament.
Garbage was maybe too strong a word, he was decent at the AO and good in Rottadam - definitely good for the last 3 matches last week as well. IW and Miami were poor. Overall I've not been impressed like I was last year by his play.
He was good in Rottadam and Stuttgart after the first match but otherwise he's not impressed me IMO. Even at the AO he played well enough but he never blew me away.
Maybe I am just expecting too much.
I think his AO form this year tends to get under-rated.
played pretty well vs Struff (who put up a good fight) and vs Gasquet
the bedene and fucsovics matches - he just did enough to win. the fucsovics match was boring though.
I thought he played excellent vs Berdych after going a break down in the first set.
was dismantling Chung in the semi before Chung retired.
final - was a good match, though not great. Only bad patch of play was from 3-2 up in the 4th set to 1-0 in the 5th set (Cilic was redlining as well)
I am disappointed in Fed's lack of commitment.
His AO 17 form definitely gets overrated, IMO. People tend to only think about the Berdych match and the 5th set of the final. His form throughout the entire tournament was up and down, as it was throughout the final.
I thought his AO 18 form was fine. At this stage of his career, it's "survive and advance" as efficiently as possible. He won. That's all that matters.
Yes, that's the tour but think how mind-numbingly boring it must be to visit the same tournaments(non-slams) year after year for over a decade! How many players besides Federer, Murray, Djokovic, and Nadal try at every tournament? Zero. If you are in the top 20, you make enough to not worry about lesser tournaments.Yep, it's called The Tour.![]()
Yes, that's the tour but think how mind-numbingly boring it must be to visit the same tournaments(non-slams) year after year for over a decade! How many players besides Federer, Murray, Djokovic, and Nadal try at every tournament? Zero. If you are in the top 20, you make enough to not worry about lesser tournaments.
Then I guess we have to ask these players why they are still putting themselves through it when they've all been there, done that so many times before? Clearly they still want to play or why bother!
Hey, we need to comfort ourselves through the night.....Fed fans if he wins: What a player, he wins even when he has bad days!
if he loses: He is tanking to be ready for Wimbledon! yeah sure...
Zverev or Nadal will be the best winners. Both hated by Fed fans + the bonus of Fed not winning Wimbledon.
Every sane person knows there will be a better version of Federer at Wimbledon. Let's hope it WILL be enough to win the tournament.
Yes, they want to play in general and make some good cash but they don't try for every single tournament(unless it's FedalMurrovic) Isn't that obvious to all by now?
I look at that Halle draw and can't get enthused about it despite Federer being there. If Federer wasn't there, there would be about 100 people in the stands to see those players in the draw.
Not surprising given all the recent matches.Fed is not serving with an abbreviated swing. His back is fine.
Might be a little stiff at most
Zverev or Nadal will be the best winners. Both hated by Fed fans + the bonus of Fed not winning Wimbledon.
Didn't play consecutive days at Hopman, then had a week off before AO, and breaks between the AO matches.He played Hopman cup and AO. Played IW and Miami without hurting his back.
It's more likely that Federer wins the US Open than either of those win Wimbledon, or even make it to the SF.I would think Federer fanatics(nuts) would prefer if Zverev wins over Nadal. If Nadal wins another Wimbledon, some of the Fed fanatics will go off the deep end.
In the meantime, the draw will be crucial. You can't count Nadal out with this pathetic field. I doubt Zverev will come close to winning Wimbledon. He's not good enough yet.
Can hardly be the cash as they've all made more than they could possibly spend in 3 lifetimes so it is obviously records they are still chasing and using the smaller events as a means towards achieving them eg. Fed keeping the #1 ranking.
Nishikori, Zverev and Thiem should have been crowd-pullers, especially home favourite Zverev. But they all disappointed leaving Fed standing alone as usual (although Paire did give him a scare today which was totally unexpected). Fed is contracted to play Halle so has little choice but to play it (unless he can pull a sickie which would be difficult to swallow after having taken the entire clay season off again).
It's more likely that Federer wins the US Open than either of those win Wimbledon, or even make it to the SF.
literally anyoneI'm not sure about that, i.e. concerning Nadal. The draw will be paramount. He could get a great draw and Fed could lose early. Who's going to beat him in that case? Dimitrov?
literally anyone
Tbh I didn't care if he won that TB or not. I don't know if he'll be "tired" at Wimbledon if he goes 3 sets with every other guy in the draw. No way to tell now, but these types of matches in places like Halle just seem so pointless to me at this point. Beating Kyrgios and Raonic might pay off, but it's not like he'll ever lose to Paire at Wimbledon.
Oh, totally; just to be clear I was declaring disappointment at Fed not fully committing to the muggery and actually losing as I requested, not that I was disappointed in his commitment to winning the match.Tbh I didn't care if he won that TB or not. I don't know if he'll be "tired" at Wimbledon if he goes 3 sets with every other guy in the draw. No way to tell now, but these types of matches in places like Halle just seem so pointless to me at this point. Beating Kyrgios and Raonic might pay off, but it's not like he'll ever lose to Paire at Wimbledon.
So now the field is impotent? C'mon it's not like Rafa's been facing a murderer's row the last 5 times.We'll see. I'm not so sure about that myself. Not with this impotent field and not if he gets some great draw or a draw which opens up.
So now the field is impotent? C'mon it's not like Rafa's been facing a murderer's row the last 5 times.
At 36, playing 4 days in a row, one week out from Wimbledon, is not going to have any positive effect. I think he’ll be near the limits of his fitness if he makes Wimbledon final. You only have to read how many times he’s said in interviews that recovery time is longer at his age. He’s playing 4 days straight...
I don’t think he’ll make the Halle final.
Hey, we need to comfort ourselves through the night.....
At 36, playing 4 days in a row, one week out from Wimbledon, is not going to have any positive effect. I think he’ll be near the limits of his fitness if he makes Wimbledon final. You only have to read how many times he’s said in interviews that recovery time is longer at his age. He’s playing 4 days straight...
I don’t think he’ll make the Halle final.
He played 4 matches in 4 consecutive days the last year at Halle and this didnt affect him at Wimby.I think he can make final - I dont think he will lose to Ebden and Sugita/Kudla